An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

The folks in Texas taking responsibility & making sure their children are safe....
This was done years before Trump came into office.
But you know that...at least you should know that.
Now they will need to do that at churches as well.
 
This isn't nazi Germany, nobody is gonna confiscate legally purchased weapons.
The fact is, the vast majority of gun violence and murders are a result of pistols, not rifles.
Like with the opioid "epidemic" no one cares until it reaches the white neighborhood, and they can afford more opioids and more guns.
 
Newsflash: Teachers Are Already Armed
Maybe we should just stop disarming them.

https://fee.org/articles/newsflash-teachers-are-already-armed/

Arm and Train?
The conservative answer to liberal prohibition (oxymoron?) is to “arm and train the teachers.” While no one has come out and suggested mandating teachers carry firearms or be trained in using them, every suggestion seems to suggest “we” (i.e., the government) need to do the arming and training.

Here’s a little newsflash for both sides: the teachers are already armed.
 
Four Little Words
I’ve often said the greatest danger to liberty is not a foreign army, terrorists, or even a homegrown tyrant. It is four little words. And they aren’t, “Up against the wall!” That comes later.

They are, “Something must be done.”
 
Also who buys the fire arms? On one hand Trump cuts teachers ability to write off school supplies they buy for students... but now there is money for guns?QUOTE]


Hey einstein, suggest going back and read the tax plan again. Nothing was changed for teacher deductions.

Way to be informed... good job.
 
Instead of the government “doing something” about mass shootings, it should stop doing something. It should stop prohibiting teachers from carrying into school the same firearms they are licensed and trusted to carry in most other places. It is the path of least resistance to providing realistic protection for schoolchildren. It requires no one to do anything they aren’t already doing.

No, this will not ensure that mass shootings “never happen again.” Nothing will. And not every teacher with a firearm, confronted with the pressure of an active shooter situation, will calmly dispatch the shooter. But as we saw in Parkland, FL, neither will every trained police officer.
 
No surprise that you nutter-butters see it that way as you have now gone anti-law enforcement in anyway. I saw it as the "good guy with a gun" once again not being the answer. Protect our children, not gun manufacturers profit margins.

Yes of course... We'll all join in taking a knee at the next national anthem.
 
Let's Try Freedom
Thomas Paine began his pamphlet, Common Sense, widely credited with convincing a critical mass of colonists to support American independence, by making a crucial distinction:

“SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins.” He went on to say, “Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

It’s time Americans remembered the miracles possible within that blessing called society and the limitations of an institution based on nothing more than consolidated brute force. Mass shootings are horrible situations under any circumstances, but they may be rendered less horrible if the victims have options other than to call the government and wait.

............
The government has had its chance. It has failed.
 
Like with the opioid "epidemic" no one cares until it reaches the white neighborhood, and they can afford more opioids and more guns.

Just Like Drugs

The first problem is the goal. It is absurdly unrealistic to believe any set of rules is going to prevent anything from “ever happening again.” If you doubt that, I invite you to examine the war on drugs. Many decades ago, politicians decided American citizens taking heroin was never going to happen again. They banned that drug completely. You aren’t allowed to possess or sell it under any circumstances. Not after a background check. Not with a doctor’s prescription. Not at all.

Today, that drug is at the center of what the same government calls an opioid “epidemic.” Epidemic. So much for heroin overdoses “never happening again.”

Yet, despite this evidence, liberals still suggest what they’ve always suggested: further restrictions on gun ownership. A good portion of them believes that only government employees charged with national defense or public safety should be allowed to carry guns. Ban them completely for the civilian population, they say, and mass shooters won’t be able to obtain them.

You know, just like drugs.
 
Just Like Drugs

The first problem is the goal. It is absurdly unrealistic to believe any set of rules is going to prevent anything from “ever happening again.” If you doubt that, I invite you to examine the war on drugs. Many decades ago, politicians decided American citizens taking heroin was never going to happen again. They banned that drug completely. You aren’t allowed to possess or sell it under any circumstances. Not after a background check. Not with a doctor’s prescription. Not at all.

Today, that drug is at the center of what the same government calls an opioid “epidemic.” Epidemic. So much for heroin overdoses “never happening again.”

Yet, despite this evidence, liberals still suggest what they’ve always suggested: further restrictions on gun ownership. A good portion of them believes that only government employees charged with national defense or public safety should be allowed to carry guns. Ban them completely for the civilian population, they say, and mass shooters won’t be able to obtain them.

You know, just like drugs.
The goal is to lessen the possibility not exasperate it.
 
It only takes 1 to fulfill his duty.

Yes I agree. His sworn duty was to protect those kids even if it meant his own life.

But also I imagine this guy was the cop at a school because he was a nice guy, who the kids respected and not because he was they type of cop who was quick on the draw. Cops are people too... and in this case I kinda get it. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong.
 
Yes I agree. His sworn duty was to protect those kids even if it meant his own life.

But also I imagine this guy was the cop at a school because he was a nice guy, who the kids respected and not because he was they type of cop who was quick on the draw.
No guts no glory.
 
Yes I agree. His sworn duty was to protect those kids even if it meant his own life.

But also I imagine this guy was the cop at a school because he was a nice guy, who the kids respected and not because he was they type of cop who was quick on the draw. Cops are people too... and in this case I kinda get it. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong.
Cowards normally are.
 
Back
Top