Hüsker Dü
DA
No surprise that you nutter-butters see it that way as you have now gone anti-law enforcement in anyway. I saw it as the "good guy with a gun" once again not being the answer. Protect our children, not gun manufacturers profit margins.
No surprise that you nutter-butters see it that way as you have now gone anti-law enforcement in anyway. I saw it as the "good guy with a gun" once again not being the answer. Protect our children, not gun manufacturers profit margins.
I don't see anything. Although I'm interested Ricky. How do you feel about Trumps comments that we should start arming and training our teachers with firearms at school?
Also who buys the fire arms? On one hand Trump cuts teachers ability to write off school supplies they buy for students... but now there is money for guns? I know you always say he's got a plan... I was hope you could explain it to me because I'm having trouble seeing it.
To me it's like the 90's again. Back when gangs were shooting up LA, and memory of it was that after Clinton's assault riffle ban all that went away. Now here we are again, except instead of angry black youths shooting up the place it's angry alt-right whites. Pretty easy to see what we've got to do.
No surprise that you nutter-butters see it that way as you have now gone anti-law enforcement in anyway. I saw it as the "good guy with a gun" once again not being the answer. Protect our children, not gun manufacturers profit margins.
We believe you believe, that's good enough for us."You still believe in polls?"
Yeah, this lying fuck was trying to blame the NRA on the CNN show with some of the survivors when his dept did nothing g to save those kids.
Hard to steal money from a program already established.I guess it's too complicated to employ the reources already in inventory. The National Guard takes an oath to defend us against all enemies foreign and domestic.
So much for protecting the kids.Hard to steal money from a program already established.
Should never come down to such a confrontation unless the assailant with the semi-automatic obtained his weapon illegally. A reckoning is coming, there's a prediction for you.So much for protecting the kids.
No surprise that you nutter-butters see it that way as you have now gone anti-law enforcement in anyway. I saw it as the "good guy with a gun" once again not being the answer. Protect our children, not gun manufacturers profit margins.
Research it yourself, ya lazy wanker...Prove it.
Peace through superior firepower is more than a prediction.Should never come down to such a confrontation unless the assailant with the semi-automatic obtained his weapon illegally. A reckoning is coming, there's a prediction for you.
The point...simply to share information.Did you have some point to posting the reference to the poll?
BTW - I voted "No" twice.
You don't? Why is that?"You still believe in polls?"
Your memory is shitty.What's your plan? To militarize the nations schools is what I hear everyone else pushing. Don't see that winning over the women in the suburbs...
You can call me a dreamer... but the assault riffle ban worked at reducing these type of attacks in the past. I'm glad we let the ban expire, and tried it. But for me it's time to say this is one where government regulation worked better.
Your memory is shitty.
The "assault weapon" ban had zero impact on gun crime.
You remember shit that never happened, hence,.."shitty memory".
No, it didnt.But being allowed to taking away assault riffles sure did cut down on the drive by shootings...
No, it didnt.
Putting people in prison did that.
How many of those gang banger weapons do you think were "legally" obtained?