An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

25% will come right out and say it.
The rest are like you.

I have already given my opinions on "your" gun rights right here, directly and honestly. If everyone is like me, you have nothing to fear - unless, of course, you are in one of the categories of concern - young, criminal, crazy, and/or stupid. 'Uneducated" is not one of the categories, but I am having some thoughts about "demonstrated gullibility".
 
I have already given my opinions on "your" gun rights right here, directly and honestly. If everyone is like me, you have nothing to fear - unless, of course, you are in one of the categories of concern - young, criminal, crazy, and/or stupid. 'Uneducated" is not one of the categories, but I am having some thoughts about "demonstrated gullibility".
I dont believe you.
This is why the second amendment is so important.
 
As long as they dont point to my rights as the problem.
You actually hit the nail on the head with your thread on guns.

The issue is inflated to promote a political direction.
Its terrible when bad things happen, but trading liberty for so called safety has a proven historical track record of disaster.

Which rights?
 
As long as they dont point to my rights as the problem.
You actually hit the nail on the head with your thread on guns.

The issue is inflated to promote a political direction.
Its terrible when bad things happen, but trading liberty for so called safety has a proven historical track record of disaster.

I imagine this is going to prompt a defensive response, but you do understand that no one can give you rights. By the very definition they are inalienable to you?
While the second amendment however is part of the Constitution. Which was document written in a way that expressly says these rules are written and granted by the Federal Government of the United States. And can be changed by the Federal Government. It even gives instructions on how to do so...
 
I imagine this is going to prompt a defensive response, but you do understand that no one can give you rights. By the very definition they are inalienable to you?
While the second amendment however is part of the Constitution. Which was document written in a way that expressly says these rules are written and granted by the Federal Government of the United States. And can be changed by the Federal Government. It even gives instructions on how to do so...
You actually agree with me.
My rights are "inherent", as i have posted multiple times today.
The second amendment is a restriction on government.

My concern is with those trying to eliminate those protections.
 
You actually agree with me.
My rights are "inherent", as i have posted multiple times today.
The second amendment is a restriction on government.

My concern is with those trying to eliminate those protections.

Well I don't necessary disagree. At this point I'm not sure I understand your argument because you conflating inalienable rights and rights granted under rule of the Constitution. I think the Bill of Rights lists Life (i.e. the list of "inalienable" rights), Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.

The Second Amendment is a good insight into the Founding Fathers minds on the issue of guns, and certainly that carries a lot of weight. However, The Founding Fathers also made slavery legal, so let's not pretend they were batting a 1000 on every issue.
 
Well I don't necessary disagree. At this point I'm not sure I understand your argument because you conflating inalienable rights and rights granted under rule of the Constitution. I think the Bill of Rights lists Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.

The Second Amendment is a good insight into the Founding Fathers minds on the issue of guns, and certainly that carries a lot of weight. However, The Founding Fathers also made slavery legal, so let's not pretend they were batting a 1000 on every issue.
The second amendment does not grant any rights.
Those rights are inherent.
The second amendment restricts the government from infringing on those inalienable rights.
 
Well I don't necessary disagree. At this point I'm not sure I understand your argument because you conflating inalienable rights and rights granted under rule of the Constitution. I think the Bill of Rights lists Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.

The Second Amendment is a good insight into the Founding Fathers minds on the issue of guns, and certainly that carries a lot of weight. However, The Founding Fathers also made slavery legal, so let's not pretend they were batting a 1000 on every issue.
Get over it.
 
The second amendment does not grant any rights.
Those rights are inherent.
The second amendment restricts the government from infringing on those inalienable rights.

Obviously not... the Constitution says the constitution is malleable with a 2/3's vote in the Senate.

If it were written as thought it were granting you natural rights, then why do they include instructions on how to make changes?
 
Well I don't necessary disagree. At this point I'm not sure I understand your argument because you conflating inalienable rights and rights granted under rule of the Constitution. I think the Bill of Rights lists Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.

The Second Amendment is a good insight into the Founding Fathers minds on the issue of guns, and certainly that carries a lot of weight. However, The Founding Fathers also made slavery legal, so let's not pretend they were batting a 1000 on every issue.

"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" are in the Declaration of Independence. The D of I, interestingly is not referenced anywhere in the US Constitution or its many amendments.

We do, however, have these lofty goals to pursue --

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.​

And that came after years of a near-suicidal war and hopelessly ineffective government under the Articles of the Confederation.

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=127
 
If the 2nd Amendment were repealed tomorrow, how many of your guns would you lose?
The second amendment is a restriction on government.
If it were repealed tomorrow, they could do whatever they wanted in regards to private gun ownership.
My personal situation is of no concern to you.
 
Back
Top