Amazingcase for increasing gun ownership in America

Get Woke, Go Broke? DICK'S Sporting Goods Warns Investors That Decision To Get Rid Of Guns Cost Company Dearly

https://www.dailywire.com/news/3893...m_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro

Dick's Sporting Goods is warning investors that its decision to remove certain "assault-style" weapons from its Field & Stream stores cost it dearly and may limit its future gains.

The sporting goods retailer was forced to confront angry shareholders late last week after its stocks tanked more than 4.5% and financial conglomerate J.P. Morgan Chase downgraded Dick's shares, saying the company was "overweight."

Free Markets Baby
 
BBMYukC.img


MIAMI — A man was shot to death outside a Billiards in Coral Springs early Sunday after police say he showed up with a machete.

According to Coral Springs police, the unidentified man was kicked out of the Premier Billiards & Sports Club — 9120 Wiles Road — at around 2 a.m. A few minutes later, he showed up with a machete and that's when someone from outside the bar shot him.

"He brandished a machete and went after a group of people," said Coral Springs spokesman Chris Swinson. "A subject that was there shot him."

The victim was transported to a nearby hospital where he was pronounced dead.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...else-had-a-gun-cops-say/ar-BBQr3CY?li=BBnbcA1


 
Lion Eyes said:
BBMYukC.img


MIAMI — A man was shot to death outside a Billiards in Coral Springs early Sunday after police say he showed up with a machete.

According to Coral Springs police, the unidentified man was kicked out of the Premier Billiards & Sports Club — 9120 Wiles Road — at around 2 a.m. A few minutes later, he showed up with a machete and that's when someone from outside the bar shot him.

"He brandished a machete and went after a group of people," said Coral Springs spokesman Chris Swinson. "A subject that was there shot him."

The victim was transported to a nearby hospital where he was pronounced dead.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...else-had-a-gun-cops-say/ar-BBQr3CY?li=BBnbcA1


Click to expand...
He sure was in a hurry to meet allah.
Wait till he finds out the 72 virgins look like Hillary and they forgot to tell him it is 1 72 year old virgin.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Harvard Landlord Tells Domestic Violence Survivor To Move Out Over Her Firearms; UPDATE: Awful Roommates Say MAGA Hat Tipped Them Off
View attachment 3513
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/12/01/harvard-landlord-n2536834?amp=true&ved=2ahUKEwipreGksYHfAhUq04MKHX59BBkQqUMwB3oECAsQIQ&usg=AOvVaw0-L6FWrwf1w34MPvb3BT_l
Click to expand...
Any roommates would do this. The stats of guns in the home are crazy...recipe for disaster. Especially for drunken college kids.
 
California’s Background Check Law Had No Impact on Gun Deaths, Johns Hopkins Study Finds

The findings—which run counter to the conventional wisdom that gun control saves lives—have received almost no media attention.

Wednesday, December 05, 2018

https://fee.org/articles/california...pact-on-gun-deaths-johns-hopkins-study-finds/

We Should Judge by Outcomes, Not Intentions

Alas, the experts are behaving exactly as expected.

More than a decade ago, the writer Louis Menand, in a New Yorker article, explained the rationalizations experts make when their theories fail to hold up in our real-world laboratory:

When they’re wrong, [experts are] rarely held accountable, and they rarely admit it, either. They insist that they were just off on timing, or blindsided by an improbable event, or almost right, or wrong for the right reasons. They have the same repertoire of self-justifications that everyone has, and are no more inclined than anyone else to revise their beliefs about the way the world works, or ought to work, just because they made a mistake.

California’s failed gun control law appears to be yet another example of experts, to paraphrase the great Milton Friedman, judging “policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”

Despite the dismal record of gun control, expect the media and “experts” to use a repertoire of self-justifications rather than modify their beliefs—regardless of what the evidence shows.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
California’s Background Check Law Had No Impact on Gun Deaths, Johns Hopkins Study Finds

The findings—which run counter to the conventional wisdom that gun control saves lives—have received almost no media attention.

Wednesday, December 05, 2018

https://fee.org/articles/california...pact-on-gun-deaths-johns-hopkins-study-finds/

We Should Judge by Outcomes, Not Intentions

Alas, the experts are behaving exactly as expected.

More than a decade ago, the writer Louis Menand, in a New Yorker article, explained the rationalizations experts make when their theories fail to hold up in our real-world laboratory:

When they’re wrong, [experts are] rarely held accountable, and they rarely admit it, either. They insist that they were just off on timing, or blindsided by an improbable event, or almost right, or wrong for the right reasons. They have the same repertoire of self-justifications that everyone has, and are no more inclined than anyone else to revise their beliefs about the way the world works, or ought to work, just because they made a mistake.

California’s failed gun control law appears to be yet another example of experts, to paraphrase the great Milton Friedman, judging “policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”

Despite the dismal record of gun control, expect the media and “experts” to use a repertoire of self-justifications rather than modify their beliefs—regardless of what the evidence shows.
Click to expand...
Why would people be against background checks for gun purchasers?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top