Amazingcase for increasing gun ownership in America

Hüsker Dü said:
Why was this study done?
  • Several governmental and nongovernmental databases track the number of law-enforcement-related deaths in the US, but all are likely to undercount these deaths.
  • To our knowledge, our study is the first to estimate the proportion of law-enforcement-related deaths properly captured by 2 data sources: official US mortality data, derived from death certificates, and The Counted, a nongovernmental database derived from news media reports.
  • US mortality data include virtually all deaths that occur in the country, and law-enforcement-related deaths are supposed to be assigned a diagnostic code corresponding to “legal intervention.” If a death is improperly assigned another code, it is considered to be misclassified, which leads to undercounting of the number of law-enforcement-related deaths. We investigated the extent of misclassification and the factors associated with misclassification.
What did the researchers do and find?
  • We estimated that 1,166 law-enforcement-related deaths occurred in the US in 2015; The Counted captured a larger proportion of these deaths than the US mortality data.
  • Law-enforcement-related deaths were most likely to be misclassified in mortality data if the death was not due to a gunshot wound or if it occurred in a low-income county.
What do these findings mean?
  • Datasets based on news media reports may offer higher-quality information on law-enforcement-related deaths than mortality data.
  • Further exploration into the ways in which policymakers and public health officials report law-enforcement-related deaths is warranted.
article
Click to expand...


Read the information before you cut n paste - post.....
 
Kamala Harris is in for one BIG smack down when her
years with Willie Brown are brought out in the Sunlight.....

She USES her ethnicity to promote herself, not her limited
brain capacity....
 
Rodent
Epson-5040UB.jpg
 
Federal judge overturns California’s 95-year-old ban on handgun advertising
2 hours
gettyimages-533207434-1280x720.jpg

A federal judge in California struck down a 1923 law that banned firearms dealers from using handgun images for advertising on storefronts. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Follow

Jana J. Pruet
What’s the story?
It all started when Sacramento Black Rifle Shop, Tracy Rifle and Pistol, along with other licensed gun dealers filed a lawsuit against the state, according to the Sacramento Bee.

The lawsuit claimed the sellers had been stopped from using “truthful, non-misleading material advertising the sale of handguns at their places of business” by California Penal Code section 26820.

For example, Tracy Rifle and Pistol was cited by the state’s Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms for violating the 1923 law in September 2014.

The dealer had four large decals on its storefront’s windows. Of those, three depicted handguns and the fourth showed a rifle, all of which could be lawfully bought inside the store.

What did the lawyers say?
Brad Benbrook, one of the lawyers representing the firearms dealers, said he was pleased with the ruling.

“This is an important victory for our clients and for the First Amendment. Judge Nunley decided that the State could not justify its censorship of our clients, and we are delighted with the opinion,” Benbrook said in a statement to the Bee. “As the court explained today, the government cannot censor commercial speech in a paternalistic effort to keep citizens from making unpopular choices — or choices the government doesn’t approve — if they are told the truth.”

What did the state say?
State Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s office told the newspaper that it was reviewing Nunley’s ruling.

The state has 30 days to file an appeal.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Federal judge overturns California’s 95-year-old ban on handgun advertising
2 hours
gettyimages-533207434-1280x720.jpg

A federal judge in California struck down a 1923 law that banned firearms dealers from using handgun images for advertising on storefronts. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Follow

Jana J. Pruet
What’s the story?
It all started when Sacramento Black Rifle Shop, Tracy Rifle and Pistol, along with other licensed gun dealers filed a lawsuit against the state, according to the Sacramento Bee.

The lawsuit claimed the sellers had been stopped from using “truthful, non-misleading material advertising the sale of handguns at their places of business” by California Penal Code section 26820.

For example, Tracy Rifle and Pistol was cited by the state’s Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms for violating the 1923 law in September 2014.

The dealer had four large decals on its storefront’s windows. Of those, three depicted handguns and the fourth showed a rifle, all of which could be lawfully bought inside the store.

What did the lawyers say?
Brad Benbrook, one of the lawyers representing the firearms dealers, said he was pleased with the ruling.

“This is an important victory for our clients and for the First Amendment. Judge Nunley decided that the State could not justify its censorship of our clients, and we are delighted with the opinion,” Benbrook said in a statement to the Bee. “As the court explained today, the government cannot censor commercial speech in a paternalistic effort to keep citizens from making unpopular choices — or choices the government doesn’t approve — if they are told the truth.”

What did the state say?
State Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s office told the newspaper that it was reviewing Nunley’s ruling.

The state has 30 days to file an appeal.
Click to expand...
She's kinda sexy.
I dont know about the big 'ol red dot sight on the hand cannon, tho.
How do you holster that thing?
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Federal judge overturns California’s 95-year-old ban on handgun advertising
2 hours
gettyimages-533207434-1280x720.jpg

A federal judge in California struck down a 1923 law that banned firearms dealers from using handgun images for advertising on storefronts. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Follow

Jana J. Pruet
What’s the story?
It all started when Sacramento Black Rifle Shop, Tracy Rifle and Pistol, along with other licensed gun dealers filed a lawsuit against the state, according to the Sacramento Bee.

The lawsuit claimed the sellers had been stopped from using “truthful, non-misleading material advertising the sale of handguns at their places of business” by California Penal Code section 26820.

For example, Tracy Rifle and Pistol was cited by the state’s Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms for violating the 1923 law in September 2014.

The dealer had four large decals on its storefront’s windows. Of those, three depicted handguns and the fourth showed a rifle, all of which could be lawfully bought inside the store.

What did the lawyers say?
Brad Benbrook, one of the lawyers representing the firearms dealers, said he was pleased with the ruling.

“This is an important victory for our clients and for the First Amendment. Judge Nunley decided that the State could not justify its censorship of our clients, and we are delighted with the opinion,” Benbrook said in a statement to the Bee. “As the court explained today, the government cannot censor commercial speech in a paternalistic effort to keep citizens from making unpopular choices — or choices the government doesn’t approve — if they are told the truth.”

What did the state say?
State Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s office told the newspaper that it was reviewing Nunley’s ruling.

The state has 30 days to file an appeal.
Click to expand...

Looks kinda like Dirty Harry's 44 Mag....

crop_dirtyharry_introslide1.jpg
 
" I lost count in all this confusion.....did I fire five or was it six....? "

" I gots ta know.....I gots ta know... "

Click....

Obama shits his pants along with the urine he's already discharged.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top