Actions in support of the Second Amendment

The linked article you dislike so much shows several examples of situations where convicted felons had their gun-ownership rights restored under the "relief" principle originally intended by Congress to keep the gun manufacturer Winchester in business after their parent company Olin Mathiesen had been found guilty of an illegal kickback scheme involving the international trade in drugs. Do you think they just made up all those cases?

Here is a more detailed analysis of the "relief" law, published by the University of Chicago Legal Forum --

Again, you're standing by an article written by a known liar funded by a partisan committee. Not my fault you didnt do your research and are now doubling down.
 
Again, you're standing by an article written by a known liar funded by a partisan committee. Not my fault you didnt do your research and are now doubling down.

You have made that claim twice. Or are you including the University of Chicago in your accusations now?

I understand that you are prejudiced against the organization. Can you find any errors in the linked article written with their support?
 
You have made that claim twice. Or are you including the University of Chicago in your accusations now?

I understand that you are prejudiced against the organization. Can you find any errors in the linked article written with their support?
Is your memory working now?
 
You have made that claim twice. Or are you including the University of Chicago in your accusations now?

I understand that you are prejudiced against the organization. Can you find any errors in the linked article written with their support?
Ill make the claim a million times if you'd like. Maybe you ought to do your research before posting articles. The university of Chicago wasnt in the original article you posted so let's stay on topic before you confuse yourself again. I believe zero from any organization that is dishonest and partisan.
 
Ill make the claim a million times if you'd like. Maybe you ought to do your research before posting articles. The university of Chicago wasnt in the original article you posted so let's stay on topic before you confuse yourself again. I believe zero from any organization that is dishonest and partisan.
You don't like them (for reasons you will not elucidate), so you will not even look to see if what they are saying is true or not. That fits pretty well into the definition of "prejudice".
 
Help me? You were the one asking for help, not me.
Magoo is famous for twisting words/post. When confronted he will then double down and if that doesn't work he stops replying. After time, if it's brought up again, he'll try denying it or try spinning it again. He famously posted that Russia spies on all foreigners and wanted to know the urinal habits of guys on the forum. He's weird...
 
You don't like them (for reasons you will not elucidate), so you will not even look to see if what they are saying is true or not. That fits pretty well into the definition of "prejudice".
Theres the disconnect. I know they are dishonest and what I'm saying is true, you want me to show you and when I refuse, to make you do your own research you claim I'm prejudice. Sound about right?
 
Theres the disconnect. I know they are dishonest and what I'm saying is true, you want me to show you and when I refuse, to make you do your own research you claim I'm prejudice. Sound about right?
You "know" they are dishonest, but you refuse to say how you came to that knowledge.
 
Magoo is famous for twisting words/post. When confronted he will then double down and if that doesn't work he stops replying. After time, if it's brought up again, he'll try denying it or try spinning it again. He famously posted that Russia spies on all foreigners and wanted to know the urinal habits of guys on the forum. He's weird...
I never understood your strange fixation with urinals.
 
By that logic I should ask you if you know the authors of the articles you post are honest or you just post because it agrees with your viewpoint...would that make you prejudiced?
I understand that the author and the organization that published the article have a publicly-stated political position. Because of that, I looked into some of the claims made in the article and I could find no deliberate mistakes. How did your analysis of the article work out?
 
I understand that the author and the organization that published the article have a publicly-stated political position. Because of that, I looked into some of the claims made in the article and I could find no deliberate mistakes. How did your analysis of the article work out?
Oh wait a minute -- you have already stated that --

"I believe zero from any organization that is dishonest and partisan."

How does that work out for you with the MAGA cult?
 
Oh wait a minute -- you have already stated that --

"I believe zero from any organization that is dishonest and partisan."

How does that work out for you with the MAGA cult?
Careful, your prejudice is causing you to make assumptions. Where have you seen any of my political beliefs?
 
The President can do nothing on that line without the help of Congress (assuming here that the Supreme Court will not upend the will of the people and Congress again).

Don't take the cowardly way out. All democrats ever do is whine and throw our tax dollars at problems. YOU see a problem. How would YOU solve that problem you see?
 
The Democrats are one of the two big criminal organizations thwarting the will of the American people, the other being the Republicans. They should both be prosecuted under the RICO statute.

Well, I have to say it's pretty funny. I've been here a short time, especially compared to you, but I never see you criticize democrats even though they've been in power the last 2.5 years. Why is that?
 
Well, I have to say it's pretty funny. I've been here a short time, especially compared to you, but I never see you criticize democrats even though they've been in power the last 2.5 years. Why is that?
I don't have to look outside San Diego County to find Democrats Bob Filner and Nathan Fletcher, both of whom blew promising careers because they couldn't keep their peckers under control.

For balanced coverage we have local Republicans Junior "It's all her fault" Hunter and Randall "Duke" Cunningham.
 
For those who care to look, it is intriguing to see your pro-guns-for-everyone messages in the trans athlete thread.
Again where does it say what side of the aisle I am on? Furthermore where did you get the pro guns for everyone when I've stated the opposite?

Stop conflating pro 2a with Democrat and Republican because it's not just r's buying ar's daily.
 
Back
Top