7v7 was a joke at SURF CUP

Has anyone seen yet what the various fields for this age group will look like this Fall? Will there be big discrepancies from field to field with the minimum and maximum dimensions?
I tried looking at the SCDSL and Cal South Websites, but I couldn't find what format of play and field sizes the 06-08 teams are playing this year. Are they 7v7 on small fields and will build out lines be used? Have teams started to practice with this in mind?

Well, my U10 (2007) DD has participated in 5 tournaments since May and the rules and field sizes have been all over the place. Only her first tournament played no punts and a build out line, but midfield was used as the build out line rather than a 14 yard line which I believe is intended. Since then there's been almost zero consistency. I guess it's at the discretion of the tournament directors and how the refs are briefed on the game rules. Hopefully this all gets straightened out by the time the fall regular season starts.
 
Well, my U10 (2007) DD has participated in 5 tournaments since May and the rules and field sizes have been all over the place. Only her first tournament played no punts and a build out line, but midfield was used as the build out line rather than a 14 yard line which I believe is intended. Since then there's been almost zero consistency. I guess it's at the discretion of the tournament directors and how the refs are briefed on the game rules. Hopefully this all gets straightened out by the time the fall regular season starts.

My 07 guested a few weeks ago. I totally forgot there was supposed to be a build out line and no keeper punts. Those rules weren't enforced. I don't recall any whistles for heading the ball either.

And she had a scrimmage this weekend. The ref and opposing coach were not aware that a ball could go any direction on a kickoff now.
Gonna be an interesting season.
 
1. 6 goals scored by keeper punts
2. several goals scored on direct kickoff shots
3. hardly any goalkeeper distributions out of the back
4. pressure line NOT implemented
5. Poor display of quality soccer or team play (win at all cost mentallity)
6. Throw ins back post....lol

at the end of the day U.S soccer and Surf Cup got it wrong......these girls are too fast, too skilled, too strong to be bottled up and the use of the small sided game was non existent............hence win at all cost ...Ugly Ugly Ugly........survival game.......smash it from anywhere on the field at your chance of a goal.......i talked to several coaches and they were actually apologetic after winning ugly games.....AND THEY SAY THIS IS GOOD FOR OUR KIDS????? blues cup, surf thanksgiving expect many teams at this age to pull out.....good luck

I completely agree. Not sure if it's US Soccer's fault or Surf Cup's, but it was ridiculous the little I saw. Saw a Crossfire team score 3 times from a kickoff. Teams were forming a wall on kickoff! Build out lines were painted but didn't look like they were being used. Keeper punts went back and forth between keepers. Poorly thought out. This is exactly the wrong direction for our youngers soccer.
 
And here we go.

Listen. The rules are having exactly their designed effect: to out the soccer know-nothings who would allow a u10 keeper to punt a ball into an opponent's box just because they can.

Frankly, US Soccer doesn't give a damn about all you people who think it's more important to win than to learn the game. They're more than happy to support the handful of people who know what the hell they're doing and let the rest of you lift cups and fall out of your lawn chairs with glee while your gazelle-like kid gets up and down as fast as they can before sailing off into the wasteland of college soccer. THEY'RE DONE WITH THAT CRAP.

So, if you care about your 8 year-old learning anything, why don't you have a word with your coach about why it's stupid for Jonny to shoot off the kickoff, despite whatever the hell some out of state club who wasted time and effort to come down here wants to do. Keep encouraging your kid to go get the ball in these new and difficult small-spaces, and don't freak when they (inevitably!) lose the ball and give up a goal because they're trying to learn to do the right thing.

If you've convinced yourself that there's such a thing as "real soccer" at u10, find the nearest mirror, gaze into it, and ask yourself where you went wrong in your quest to understand this game.

Or don't. But don't pretend like the rest of us need to play along with your rec-soccer charade. The kids need to learn to play properly, and that shit is hard to do. A big field at 9 won't help them to do it.
 
At least in sand soccer, a keeper punt is considered indirect and needs to hit someone before it goes in.
I wonder what the kids would do on a small field like this if there were no coaches. Would they shoot from the kickoff? Would a keeper try to punt it into the goal?
Soccer (actually, all sports) at this age shouldn't be "coach driven". It should be player driven. If a team wins or loses a game at 9 years old because of a "great coaching move" something is wrong.
I coach basketball for 6th grade girls. They are all beginners. We've played teams that have 10 different "plays" to in-bound the ball. They run 8 different offenses. But only 1 girl per team can dribble the ball. And they are 30% on layups. Don't know how to box out. On defense they run to a "spot" around the paint and play zone defense (11 year old girls can't shoot much beyond 10 feet, so it's a good strategy. But it's lazy).
My team has lost a few more than we've won. But our practices are focused on dribbling, jump-stop, pivot if you pick up your dribble, and shooting layups. On offense we run a 3-2 with a pick on the ball. Or a 1-4 isolation. We don't assign positions. We teach them about spacing and cutting. I don't park the big kid in the middle. Everyone should be able to dribble the ball if they get it. And we only play man-to-man defense.
 
And here we go.

Listen. The rules are having exactly their designed effect: to out the soccer know-nothings who would allow a u10 keeper to punt a ball into an opponent's box just because they can.

Frankly, US Soccer doesn't give a damn about all you people who think it's more important to win than to learn the game. They're more than happy to support the handful of people who know what the hell they're doing and let the rest of you lift cups and fall out of your lawn chairs with glee while your gazelle-like kid gets up and down as fast as they can before sailing off into the wasteland of college soccer. THEY'RE DONE WITH THAT CRAP.

So, if you care about your 8 year-old learning anything, why don't you have a word with your coach about why it's stupid for Jonny to shoot off the kickoff, despite whatever the hell some out of state club who wasted time and effort to come down here wants to do. Keep encouraging your kid to go get the ball in these new and difficult small-spaces, and don't freak when they (inevitably!) lose the ball and give up a goal because they're trying to learn to do the right thing.

If you've convinced yourself that there's such a thing as "real soccer" at u10, find the nearest mirror, gaze into it, and ask yourself where you went wrong in your quest to understand this game.

Or don't. But don't pretend like the rest of us need to play along with your rec-soccer charade. The kids need to learn to play properly, and that shit is hard to do. A big field at 9 won't help them to do it.

Yes, I agree that some teams played to use every advantage and some teams didn't. But why didn't Surf Cup enforce the rules designed for the smaller fields? It's a simple fix, isn't it? Why paint build-out lines and then IGNORE them? Just seemed to me to be poorly thought-out.
 
It's a little ironic we're still actively arguing over a game being "fixed" in Nationals and now we're arguing over a team doing what it takes to win in Surf Cup with ridiculously small fields. High profile tournaments are not the place to assume a team is going to "do what's best for long term development".
 
It's a little ironic we're still actively arguing over a game being "fixed" in Nationals and now we're arguing over a team doing what it takes to win in Surf Cup with ridiculously small fields. High profile tournaments are not the place to assume a team is going to "do what's best for long term development".
Wez, you bring up a great point. The game is being played according to the rules without the desired result.
 
Were the goals used on the short sided fields 6.5 X 18 like they're supposed to be? If anybody saw the U12 USSDA games on the boys side, was it also blast it to win, or were the games better?
 
Were the goals used on the short sided fields 6.5 X 18 like they're supposed to be? If anybody saw the U12 USSDA games on the boys side, was it also blast it to win, or were the games better?

The small fields were a disaster, imho. In the course of the 6 games this weekend, we scored at least a half dozen headers from throw ins. You preferred a throw in over a corner kick, because you could more accurately place the ball right toward the goal. Just had to make sure someone got their head on it.
 
It's a little ironic we're still actively arguing over a game being "fixed" in Nationals and now we're arguing over a team doing what it takes to win in Surf Cup with ridiculously small fields. High profile tournaments are not the place to assume a team is going to "do what's best for long term development".

Well, that discussion wasn't about tactics. It was about whether a competition actually took place.

I didn't camp out at the fields, but I did stop to marvel at 1) kids forming a wall on kickoff, and 2) parents going absolutely insane. I had forgotten about the insanity levels at the younger ages.
 
Were the goals used on the short sided fields 6.5 X 18 like they're supposed to be? If anybody saw the U12 USSDA games on the boys side, was it also blast it to win, or were the games better?

From what I saw (and please correct me if I'm wrong), there were 3 sizes of fields. Full sized 11v11, smaller sizes (8v8?), and tiny (7v7?). It was those tiny fields that we're talking about. Might be ok if they played 5v5 and they didn't allow punts, throw-ins and shots on kickoff.
 
The small fields were a disaster, imho. In the course of the 6 games this weekend, we scored at least a half dozen headers from throw ins. You preferred a throw in over a corner kick, because you could more accurately place the ball right toward the goal. Just had to make sure someone got their head on it.

When the new rules came out, I thought "This is awesome. We are smack dab at the inflection point of when youth soccer in the US will propel our players to compete on an international stage when they are adults."
After seeing this and other posts, I now feel like saying "Oh no. We are in soccer purgatory for a while. Same clowns, different circus."
 
Back
Top