2020...

Inept and deeply in debt.

But you don't have to consider the option of bankruptcy until your creditors start demanding payment and you can't do it. One solution is to find another creditor, who may have his own reasons for saving the situation.
 
Oh My......she better stick to the BOTOX, BONDO and PAINT.....the alternative is down right hideous...
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uF-Sl5cTslA/maxresdefault.jpg
74E09535-9968-4F79-95BD-48D48C0B37EA.jpeg
 
T is not fat?

Is 27 lbs over the suggested weight fat for a 6' 3" adult male at 73......?
243 lbs - 27 lbs = 216 lbs

" His ideal weight range would be between 176 and 216 pounds. "

Are you " Fat ".....?

Your pictures suggest the remote possibility of being maybe " Morbidly Obese "....
Prove to the forum you're within CDC standards....you are aware of the " CDC "

now aren't you.....

 
Is 27 lbs over the suggested weight fat for a 6' 3" adult male at 73......?
243 lbs - 27 lbs = 216 lbs

" His ideal weight range would be between 176 and 216 pounds. "

Are you " Fat ".....?

Your pictures suggest the remote possibility of being maybe " Morbidly Obese "....
Prove to the forum you're within CDC standards....you are aware of the " CDC "

now aren't you.....

Whoops. 6’2” on Lardass’ official government document. Better recalculate dumbass. 830E292A-B21E-41A1-BBED-1873725594BD.jpeg
 
Whoops. 6’2” on Lardass’ official government document. Better recalculate dumbass. View attachment 7327


And.......what's your point " Dumbass ".....it's the same for a 6' 2" to 6' 3" adult male at 73 years old.....

Look it up.......

" Ideal " is 172 - 197 depending on the person....



 
And.......what's your point " Dumbass ".....it's the same for a 6' 2" to 6' 3" adult male at 73 years old.....

Look it up.......

Ideal is 172 - 197 depending on the person....



what makes you believe lardass is even 6’2”, shitforbrains?
6940BF0B-E30B-4323-89D2-CAC4D7BFF9EC.jpeg
 
Since I try to read a variety of news sources, including what I assume you are calling the libtard media this should be corrected to saying its more they are mad at Biden for not commenting. From the other news sources I read, the NY Post has it front page and like Biden the NY Times doesn't spend much time on it.

I never saw a single news agency upset at Biden for not talking.
 
Fair enough... you didn't protest at free speech but you took issue with Trump asking officials to look into Hunter Biden's situation in Ukraine. For starters, it's a president's responsibility to secure the safety of our nation and clearly the situation was suspect at best. Second, Trump did not ask to investigate Pap Smear... only his derelict son that had ZERO qualifications for the job he was handed.

Can you point me to a single post that even remotely suggest I'm for censoring crazy people of any stripe?

Believe it or not, it's possible to believe in Steve King's right to say stupid things, and that the GOP has the right to voice their support of other candidates if King gets so crazy he starts scaring the suburban soccer moms into becoming democrats.
 
I don't disagree with Biden on every issue either, yet I'm still going to vote for him.

How do you Republican's do it? Just agree with whatever Trump says? Hmm...

I'm not a republican... and I'm not aware of anyone agreeing with whatever he says, but at least I can UNDERSTAND what Trump says. He's not a babbling idiot that can't remember what job he's applying for. Furthermore, I'm more concerned about actions... and the actions say Trump is getting us out of money bleeding deals, working to improve our border security and making cuts to programs that allow a family of 5, I see all the time, filling a cart of crap, at Wal Mart, instead of working or going to school. If you need EBT to pay your bills, stop having sex without birth control.

And if you want to talk about the actions of democrats, I think the last 3.5 years have been a complete disgrace.
 
Back
Top