umm I thought that we already had a number. UCLA minus 1/2. Did I just imagine that? 3 goals is a non-starter. Not that I don't think that they are going to win by 3. I just don't like that number in what amounts to a local rivalry game. That and Pepperdine is a top 25 by the end of the season.
Stanford: 6 goals in opening 24 minutes against the team that beat Cal two weekends ago. Just wow.
@MakeAPlay are we going to handicap it or not. I didn't take the future line so now we talking crowds? Yes handicap the game pleaseWas this all talk then @The Driver ? I understand if it was but the crowd I hang with only spits real talk not bravado. If you are a man of his word you see in writing what you posted. Otherwise it's just talk and that's what most on this forum are about. You've seen the product that I put on the field. I was talking smack from day one because like I said my kid was engineered for this.
The ball is in your court. Are you all talk or what?
@MakeAPlay are we going to handicap it or not. I didn't take the future line so now we talking crowds? Yes handicap the game please
@MakeAPlay I love how you trying to work this friendly wager for entertainment purposes only@The Driver you are being unclear again. Are you saying okay I am honoring what You said or okay you are backing out of what You said earlier?
This isn't the club thread. We play for real here.
@MakeAPlay I love how you trying to work this friendly wager for entertainment purposes only
Let me know when you want to handicap the game
We know the stakes let's get the line poppin as well
Oh @MakeAPlay you making a big deal out of handicapping the UCLA Pepperdine game. Let's handicap this one.I don't wager for entertainment I wager to win. Clearly you are playing kid games. I am the one who wanted it handled via PM so no entertainment here. It sounds to me like you are all talk. I quoted your post. Now you are saying we are handicapping the game. This ain't casino. I don't handicap. You said Pepperdine plus 1/2 which is why @Ricky Fandango asked were you generous or rich.
Stop with the kid games. My friendly wagers are real. Please remember that the next time you want to suggest one. I think that you might have me confused with someone else.
Leave me out of it.I don't wager for entertainment I wager to win. Clearly you are playing kid games. I am the one who wanted it handled via PM so no entertainment here. It sounds to me like you are all talk. I quoted your post. Now you are saying we are handicapping the game. This ain't casino. I don't handicap. You said Pepperdine plus 1/2 which is why @Ricky Fandango asked were you generous or rich.
Stop with the kid games. My friendly wagers are real. Please remember that the next time you want to suggest one. I think that you might have me confused with someone else.
I read it as either a 1/2 point or a 2 to 1 option and there was an offer to PM to work out the details.Driver you're backing out of your original bet. That's not cool!
Subsequent posts after #1277 seem to confirm the wager.Driver you're backing out of your original bet. That's not cool!
It's post #1277 in this thread.
Entertainment purposes only, of course.On a hook in my Sunday going to meeting kit
Neva that
Only time I would play the Futures would be if my own was playing.
We handicapping for entertainment purposes only or not.
Pepperdine + 3
Or
UCLA - 3.5
On a hook in my Sunday going to meeting kit
Neva that
Only time I would play the Futures would be if my own was playing.
We handicapping for entertainment purposes only or not.
Pepperdine + 3
Or
UCLA - 3.5
Do you have a son or daughter playing division 1 2 3 at the momentAs I posted, backing out of your OG bet. smh cray cray!