Multi Sport
DA
One thing was definitely clear and that's Buffet/Berkshire's awareness of climate change.
Can you provide me a period in time that climate change was not happening.
One thing was definitely clear and that's Buffet/Berkshire's awareness of climate change.
No, not now and not evah.Can you provide me a period in time that climate change was not happening.
Can you provide me a period in time that climate change was not happening.
No, not now and not evah.
Lets just follow the money and that will bear fruit.
You think I'm going to debate with scientific consensus? Can I tell you the Earth revolves around the sun because of my research? No. As Joe points out, follow the money. The reason there is an anti-science side to the debate is because we are a fossil-fuel based economy and the oil companies' money has created a fake "debate."Can you provide me a period in time that climate change was not happening.
Yes, the science side has no need or want for money.You think I'm going to debate with scientific consensus? Can I tell you the Earth revolves around the sun because of my research? No. As Joe points out, follow the money. The reason there is an anti-science side to the debate is because we are a fossil-fuel based economy and the oil companies' money has created a fake "debate."
Yes, the science side has no need or want for money.
There will always be research, folks. When it reveals issues (such as the NFL concussion research and climate change and tobacco) that threaten massive corporate profits, there are no limits to the lengths that those threatened will go to via media campaigns, character assassination, falsifying its own research, etc., to protect their position. For some reason, the right now believes, as I have stated, that the scientific research side as the power. Somehow we find conservative politics telling us that while telling us that the white hetero male is the oppressed, labor (in an economy where wages are stagnant) wields too much power over management, etc. SMH.Science needs funding like anything else, difference is, it doesn't rely on a false narrative to further it's profits.
Actually Wez, the discussion is not AGW. Everyone knows that AGW exist, but the question is to what extent it is affecting the environment."Climate Change" is not the important part of the discussion. Since the industrial revolution, AGW has become the relevant discussion.
Actually Wez, the discussion is not AGW. Everyone knows that AGW exist, but the question is to what extent it is affecting the environment.
Is it so bad that we need to shutter the coal industry and do away with gasoline powered vehicles? Or is it having such a minor impact that we can continue business as usual?
The problem is you can't just use data. Scientist have gone on record saying that we are still exiting the past ice age, so that would mean the Earth is warming. If the that's true, how much warming is just naturally happening? What percent is AGW?
That is exactly what it counts on, plus peoples fears. Other peoples fears.Science needs funding like anything else, difference is, it doesn't rely on a false narrative to further it's profits.
Science counts on fears? So if we weren't afraid of things, we wouldn't have scientific research? I think earlier today you called me a weirdo and now you write this? Give me the science about pots and kettles.That is exactly what it counts on, plus peoples fears. Other peoples fears.
That is exactly what it counts on, plus peoples fears. Other peoples fears.
How is this for a false narrative, fear mongering.Science needs funding like anything else, difference is, it doesn't rely on a false narrative to further it's profits.
Can you please tell me what side of the fence the media is on?Media stokes emotions, science doesn't.
we knew about miami, where it's already happening. New York started to reveal when the wall street subway station flooded a couple of years ago. where is the false narrative, exactly?How is this for a false narrative, fear mongering.
Scientists Claim Hundreds of U.S. Cities May Not Survive Rising Waters…
It was fucking weirdo, get your fact straight.Science counts on fears? So if we weren't afraid of things, we wouldn't have scientific research? I think earlier today you called me a weirdo and now you write this? Give me the science about pots and kettles.
well joey, let's unpack that question in the face of the Breitbart article that you just sent, screaming about all the cities going underwater...in their overwrought effort to cite the union of concerned scientists' study.Can you please tell me what side of the fence the media is on?
Fake newswe knew about miami, where it's already happening. New York started to reveal when the wall street subway station flooded a couple of years ago. where is the false narrative, exactly?
Can you please tell me what side of the fence the media is on?
There you go again. You're totally my oldest son, when he was 5 and he would hear things he didn't want to hear, so he would run away with his fingers in his ears.Fake news