2017-2018 D1 Women's Soccer Talk!

MakeAPlay said:
Luckily outside of Texas and North Carolina the other states are minor players in most sports.
Click to expand...
One option could be for the athletes to put pressure on the state to back the F off on the social crusade, and get back to the three R's.
Just a suggestion.
 
MakeAPlay said:
Stanford and one of the state schools will both be pretty stacked and possible college cup teams. The college cup is back in North Carolina and state schools can't play games there. So if that stats school is in the college cup they will have to forfeit or get some sort of waiver. Stanford may or may not do what the state schools do. $C isn't doing what the state schools are doing.
Click to expand...
The College Cup will be held in Florida.
http://www.ncaa.com/championships/soccer-women/d1
 
Bernie Sanders said:
One option could be for the athletes to put pressure on the state to back the F off on the social crusade, and get back to the three R's.
Just a suggestion.
Click to expand...

The athletes would be supportive of the boycott for the most part. I honestly wouldn't have a problem with her team going undefeated and then refusing to play. The NCAA is pretty forward thinking and since a good percentage of the national championships come from the Golden state I think that exceptions may be made.
 
chargerfan said:
You consider punishing states for not providing basic civil rights for minority groups a "social crusade"?
Click to expand...
No.
I consider the social crusade, a social crusade.

If you can point to a "basic civil right" any of the states in question do not provide, we may have an agreement.
 
Bernie Sanders said:
Why, specifically?
Click to expand...

I'm sure you would have been against a boycott of southern states during Jim Crow as well. Until all our citizens are granted equal rights, it is up to us to put a spotlight on those that deny them. I'm assuming you do not have an lgbtq family member or close friend that you love denied their basic rights.
 
chargerfan said:
I'm sure you would have been against a boycott of southern states during Jim Crow as well. Until all our citizens are granted equal rights, it is up to us to put a spotlight on those that deny them. I'm assuming you do not have an lgbtq family member or close friend that you love denied their basic rights.
Click to expand...
You assume alot, but it doesnt seem like you want to specifically explain which "basic rights" are being taken away.
Are you confusing civil liberties with civil rights?
Are you referring to "basic rights" as constitutional rights?

Which "rights" ?
 
chargerfan said:
I'm sure you would have been against a boycott of southern states during Jim Crow as well. Until all our citizens are granted equal rights, it is up to us to put a spotlight on those that deny them. I'm assuming you do not have an lgbtq family member or close friend that you love denied their basic rights.
Click to expand...

You California people are f-ing retarded when it comes to social issues. 80% of the country laughs there asses off at your stupidity.
 
chargerfan said:
I'm sure you would have been against a boycott of southern states during Jim Crow as well. Until all our citizens are granted equal rights, it is up to us to put a spotlight on those that deny them. I'm assuming you do not have an lgbtq family member or close friend that you love denied their basic rights.
Click to expand...
I'll disregard the baseless insinuation, and give you the benefit of the doubt.
Lets say, for the sake of argument, that our state legislature disagrees with the state legislature of another state.
The legislatures of both states are duly elected by the citizens of those states to represent them.
Both states fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government where "basic" constitutional, civil, and federal laws demand adherence to our constitution.
States rights are protected under the constitution as well, and this is the crux of the argument.

How would you like it if Texas and Kentucky or South Carolina decided they knew better than the people of our state, how we should run it under the framework of the US Constitution?
 
Let the kids play their games, and take the political game to capitol hill.
We dont need any political group using sports as a weapon against their poilitical adversaries.

btw, I didnt bring this up.
I just disagree with the tactic.
 
Bernie Sanders said:
Let the kids play their games, and take the political game to capitol hill.
We dont need any political group using sports as a weapon against their poilitical adversaries.

btw, I didnt bring this up.
I just disagree with the tactic.
Click to expand...

I brought it up and to be quite honest with you creatively discriminatory laws are commonplace in the South. I'm sorry but there are absolutes and those states will change once something that matters to them is affected.
 
MakeAPlay said:
I brought it up and to be quite honest with you creatively discriminatory laws are commonplace in the South. I'm sorry but there are absolutes and those states will change once something that matters to them is affected.
Click to expand...
Commonplace?
Can you tell me which laws you are referring to?
Are there any "creatively discriminating" laws in California?
 
MakeAPlay said:
I brought it up and to be quite honest with you creatively discriminatory laws are commonplace in the South. I'm sorry but there are absolutes and those states will change once something that matters to them is affected.
Click to expand...
Again, retarded. Not one legislature gives a shit about women's college soccer. Now I am laughing.
 
push_up said:
Again, retarded. No one gives a shit about women's college soccer. Now I am laughing.
Click to expand...
I give a shit about it, but to be honest, only because my daughters play it.
I think the intended "boycott" includes other sports as well.

My take, is that we have a social crusade, pretending to be a real civil rights cause.

Nobody will even tell me which "basic rights" are being infringed.
 
No basic rights are being infringed. You can still stick your stick and platinum vajeen where you want. You can dress up as a girl or boy. You can even think you are a girl or a boy with or without a stick. You can even be queer if you choose. The point is that you can choose but I don't have to agree with it. GOD BLESS AMERICA.
 
Bernie Sanders said:
You assume alot, but it doesnt seem like you want to specifically explain which "basic rights" are being taken away.
Are you confusing civil liberties with civil rights?
Are you referring to "basic rights" as constitutional rights?

Which "rights" ?
Click to expand...

The rights to marry, start a family, join an extracurricular at a public school, use the damn restroom, etc. based on gender or sexuality.

I believe you need to look up the definition of civil rights.

So I assumed correctly?
 
push_up said:
No basic rights are being infringed. You can still stick your stick and platinum vajeen where you want. You can dress up as a girl or boy. You can even think you are a girl or a boy with or without a stick. You can even be queer if you choose. The point is that you can choose but I don't have to agree with it. GOD BLESS AMERICA.
Click to expand...


Came for the soccer talk, ended up getting bigotry and ignorance. Trumps America, ladies and gentlemen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top