“Overdribbling”.
Little game theory here. Assuming both players are equally matched, there is no universe where an attacking player should be able to get around by dribbling and score on two similarly skilled defending players (one of them being a goalkeeper). If that’s happening, there’s a mismatch with one of the two defending players. And at the mlsn level, especially once the puberty advantage is wiped away, so are those easy advantages since everyone has gotten to the highest level. You can’t shoot over the gk anymore. You can’t trick the defender with something like a step over. That’s why so few goals at the mlsn levels are just shots from the top of the 18. It’s going to be rare for an attacking player to get free and have the time and place it in a corner where the gk can’t get it. It’s why most of the goals come from things like corners, cutbacks, creative 1v1s, creative dfks, pks and mistakes building out of the back. So the best you can hope on the dribble is to gain some micro space to pass it creatively. If you dribble it you will eventually lose it. And the more times you do it the more turnovers you will be responsible for. Creativity at that level is mostly seeing the creative passing that breaks lines and off ball movement. So in making your case you have inadvertently undermined your position by pointing to the one factor coaches usually should bench you for. And unlike size, it’s one the player actually has total control. Youth soccer is littered with attackers who break into the first years at the higher letter leagues and then don’t perform to expectations because they find they can’t dribble the ball and shoot over the gks head and be the superstar they were on their f1 team. The u13 and u14 ages are where every position (eg the big gk who used to be a truck but now is too out of shape to learn to dive, the striker who could outrun everyone over the top, the cdm who used to hide as a redundant player) fafo. Adapt or die.
