T 2.0

Q Post 4160 05/08/2020
We can help guide once you hit a target.
It must be open-source.
Happy hunting!
Q

"We were asked thousands of questions in the drops to get us thinking differently and to guide us in certain directions.

“IT MUST BE OPEN SOURCE”‼️

Our FINDINGS must be open source.

This point is IMPERATIVE.

In order to PROVE that our theories are NOT CONSPIRACIES, we need to show verifiable proof.

We call this THE SAUCE.

Without any sauce, you’ve got nothing.

This is where it becomes extremely important to be careful who you follow.

There are many people who will show you various screen shots from a Telegram channel for example, and have nothing credible to back them up.

When you question them, they then tell you to “do your own research.” 🙄

There are also people who will show you credible looking proof, but then they will only show parts of, which can make something that is a total lie, to look true.

These people are the most dangerous as they quite often are part of an organization with an agenda.

Also, don’t just assume other people are correct when you share posts, etc.

Even if the person is well known and credible, we all make mistakes.

WE ARE THE NEWS NOW.

We have to get it right, every time, and if we occasionally do get it wrong, we just need to own it and correct it.

Holding ourselves accountable is what gives us credibility and earns us trust." Anon Patriot

1746737437619.png
 
Last edited:
watfly said:
I drive by a Catholic Charities Immigrant Services office every day and there were often long lines of immigrants waiting to get assistance. Not so much anymore, but the organization certainly enables illegal immigrants.
Click to expand...
"enables" is an interesting word choice. I would say "assists", as its seen as part of their mission to help those in need, but they are not moving them across the border to my knowledge, which would be "enabling".
 
whatithink said:
"enables" is an interesting word choice. I would say "assists", as its seen as part of their mission to help those in need, but they are not moving them across the border to my knowledge, which would be "enabling".
Click to expand...
That's a classic "distinction without a difference". CC enables illegal aliens to live in the US by providing food and shelter, as many come here with zero assets and can't be legally employed. Without CC's, or other NGO's, assistance, coming here illegally would not be feasible for most.

If CC's wants to feed illegals at a detention center then more power to them.

Of course, CC will claim they're guided by a higher power to justify their complicity in being an accessory after the fact.
 
watfly said:
That's a classic "distinction without a difference". CC enables illegal aliens to live in the US by providing food and shelter, as many come here with zero assets and can't be legally employed. Without CC's, or other NGO's, assistance, coming here illegally would not be feasible for most.

If CC's wants to feed illegals at a detention center then more power to them.

Of course, CC will claim they're guided by a higher power to justify their complicity in being an accessory after the fact.
Click to expand...
I disagree. They provide food and shelter to those in need and don't distinguish between them based on their legal status.
 
whatithink said:
I disagree. They provide food and shelter to those in need and don't distinguish between them based on their legal status.
Click to expand...
Hey Moe, lots of information TS hitting the news cycle rounds from Anon's saying Pope Leo "moved" a few of the Pedo Priests to other parishes, as to hide their dirty deeds. One guy on TS says he's reincarnated and now going to be good Pope. I'm waiting for more sauce to back up this claim. Also, he's made some nasty comments about T in the past and is a registered Republican, like Liz Cheany, Bush clans and traitor Pence
 
watfly said:
Are you claiming that illegals are unaware of that fact when they cross the border?
Click to expand...
No. I am saying that Catholic Charities are not "enabling" migrants to cross the border, and they serve those in need irrespective of their legal status.

You seem to be suggesting that they are complicit in illegals crossing the border, like coyotes (?), and/or that illegals cross the border, in part, to avail of the services of Catholic Charities.
 
whatithink said:
No. I am saying that Catholic Charities are not "enabling" migrants to cross the border, and they serve those in need irrespective of their legal status.

You seem to be suggesting that they are complicit in illegals crossing the border, like coyotes (?), and/or that illegals cross the border, in part, to avail of the services of Catholic Charities.
Click to expand...
Now your putting words in my mouth. I said enabled, not complicit, and I wouldn't say they're proactively encouraging illegal immigration. However, without the services and assistance of CC and other NGO's, it wouldn't be feasible for illegal immigrants to come here. You can use all the semantics you want, but that's the reality and the end result.

I don't doubt that CC is well meaning but "It is always with the best intentions that the worst work is done".
 
watfly said:
Now your putting words in my mouth. I said enabled, not complicit, and I wouldn't say they're proactively encouraging illegal immigration. However, without the services and assistance of CC and other NGO's, it wouldn't be feasible for illegal immigrants to come here. You can use all the semantics you want, but that's the reality and the end result.

I don't doubt that CC is well meaning but "It is always with the best intentions that the worst work is done".
Click to expand...

You did say complicit.

watfly said:
That's a classic "distinction without a difference". CC enables illegal aliens to live in the US by providing food and shelter, as many come here with zero assets and can't be legally employed. Without CC's, or other NGO's, assistance, coming here illegally would not be feasible for most.

If CC's wants to feed illegals at a detention center then more power to them.

Of course, CC will claim they're guided by a higher power to justify their complicity in being an accessory after the fact.
Click to expand...

They are not responsible for fixing immigration. There was a bill last year that went a long way to codifying fixes. With a GOP trifecta, they could codify what they want, pretty much, but its not a priority to legislate on - it doesn't ever appear to be, which is weird for something which is clearly a huge issue for this country.

The CC are responsible for fulfilling their mission, if you will. Its not semantics for me to say they will feed, cloth and shelter the needy irrespective of their legal status. If they were not there, illegal immigrants would still cross the border. Likewise, if the illegals were not there, the CC would still be feeding, clothing, and sheltering those in need.
 
watfly said:
Now your putting words in my mouth. I said enabled, not complicit, and I wouldn't say they're proactively encouraging illegal immigration. However, without the services and assistance of CC and other NGO's, it wouldn't be feasible for illegal immigrants to come here. You can use all the semantics you want, but that's the reality and the end result.

I don't doubt that CC is well meaning but "It is always with the best intentions that the worst work is done".
Click to expand...
I forgot, Moe and Curly have me on ignore. Most of the people who work in the NGOs and CC are good people. However, we got bad people everywhere. Wolve's in sheep's clothing and they prey on kids. Let's see what happens and what Larry, Moe and Curly have to say on ths very important subject.
 
whatithink said:
You did say complicit.



They are not responsible for fixing immigration. There was a bill last year that went a long way to codifying fixes. With a GOP trifecta, they could codify what they want, pretty much, but its not a priority to legislate on - it doesn't ever appear to be, which is weird for something which is clearly a huge issue for this country.

The CC are responsible for fulfilling their mission, if you will. Its not semantics for me to say they will feed, cloth and shelter the needy irrespective of their legal status. If they were not there, illegal immigrants would still cross the border. Likewise, if the illegals were not there, the CC would still be feeding, clothing, and sheltering those in need.
Click to expand...
Complicit after the fact. Not in getting them across the border. Very few immigrants would cross the border if there wasn't a vehicle to feed and shelter them. They'd either have to have family with the ability to feed them or be part of a gang or similar

Does CC report the illegals to ICE? No, hence complicit. You are aware that its a criminal act to knowingly harbor an illegal alien?
 
watfly said:
I don't disagree with a lot of what you say, but the left has to have more than "Orange Man Bad". That strategy has failed miserably. Trump's character flaws and behavior is already "baked into the cake" for a majority of voters.
Click to expand...
They tired to warn America but America wanted cheaper eggs. I’m pretty sure, even though many MAGAs are still holding on to hope, voters had no idea Trump would take everything to the extreme, testing every system we have. Selling influence through crypto sales, tariff exemptions and possibly opening federal lands up for bid has turned many independent voters against this administration, but they don’t care. I truly feel this administration will not go quietly at the end of this term. Trump has the backing of America’s wealthy for the time being. When Laura Ingraham starts questioning things . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top