Elon Musk

1. This is from Reuters. They aren't exactly full of journalistic integrity.

Example:

"Questions on journalism ethics, neutrality, professionalism, and accuracy have shadowed international media outlets and journalists’ coverage of Türkiye and its political dynamics for the past few years.

A recent striking example is Reuters fake reporting on unsubstantiated allegations that anti-corruption authorities in the US and Sweden are reviewing a complaint claiming that the Swedish affiliate of a US company promised to pay tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks if a son of Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan helped it secure a dominant market position in the country."

2. They are reporting hearsay, non factual information and trying to pass it off as fact. At least to people like you who are now suffering from EDS/MDS/TDS.

3. Please continue. It's definitely comical..
 
1. This is from Reuters. They aren't exactly full of journalistic integrity.

Example:

"Questions on journalism ethics, neutrality, professionalism, and accuracy have shadowed international media outlets and journalists’ coverage of Türkiye and its political dynamics for the past few years.

A recent striking example is Reuters fake reporting on unsubstantiated allegations that anti-corruption authorities in the US and Sweden are reviewing a complaint claiming that the Swedish affiliate of a US company promised to pay tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks if a son of Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan helped it secure a dominant market position in the country."

2. They are reporting hearsay, non factual information and trying to pass it off as fact. At least to people like you who are now suffering from EDS/MDS/TDS.

3. Please continue. It's definitely comical..
Is this your source for that quote about Reuters?

 
Is this your source for that quote about Reuters?

But just in case you want more..

"The global news agency Reuters has recently acknowledged retracting a report it hastily published on February 11, which included a truncated statement attributed to His Majesty King Abdullah during his meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House.

The acknowledgment came six days after the misleading report was published, raising questions about the delayed correction and whether the mistake was intentional, especially as it was within a sensitive political context."

Oh.. and then there's this.

A 2022 Economist/YouGov poll found that only 29% of Americans found Reuters trustworthy.
 
But just in case you want more..

"The global news agency Reuters has recently acknowledged retracting a report it hastily published on February 11, which included a truncated statement attributed to His Majesty King Abdullah during his meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House.

The acknowledgment came six days after the misleading report was published, raising questions about the delayed correction and whether the mistake was intentional, especially as it was within a sensitive political context."

Oh.. and then there's this.

A 2022 Economist/YouGov poll found that only 29% of Americans found Reuters trustworthy.
<Boustrophedon mode enabled>
Now you are quoting a different source, in the
جوردان تايمز
authored by
خالد شقران
. Do you read the
جوردان تايمز
regularly? Or were you directed there by a third unnamed party (and if so, whom)?
...
<Boustrophedon mode disabled>

And then there is this (from 2024 instead of 2022)--

 
Last edited:
<Boustrophedon mode enabled>
Now you are quoting a different source, in the
جوردان تايمز
authored by
خالد شقران
. Do you read the
جوردان تايمز
regularly? Or were you directed there by a third unnamed party (and if so, whom)?
...
<Boustrophedon mode disabled>

And then there is this (from 2024 instead of 2022)--

Ummm.. yea. Do you need a syllabus to keep up?
 
It's like you blindly post things because they validate what you are led to believe, but you don't do any due diligence to see if they are actually true.
- @whatithink

Sound familiar now what I was saying on the T 2.0 thread or you still need me to spell it out?
 
It's like you blindly post things because they validate what you are led to believe, but you don't do any due diligence to see if they are actually true.
- @whatithink

Sound familiar now what I was saying on the T 2.0 thread or you still need me to spell it out?
I did find this - hope that helps you

Over the three-year span from 2022 to 2024, Tesla reported $10.8 billion in U.S. income but paid only $48 million in federal income taxes, resulting in an average effective tax rate of approximately 0.4%, significantly below the statutory corporate tax rate of 21%.
 
I did find this - hope that helps you

Over the three-year span from 2022 to 2024, Tesla reported $10.8 billion in U.S. income but paid only $48 million in federal income taxes, resulting in an average effective tax rate of approximately 0.4%, significantly below the statutory corporate tax rate of 21%.
So @espola throws some random post from X up with nothing to back it up.
You rail all over @kickingandscreaming but give Lil e a pass.

Would you like to credibly source this, i.e. not some random on X?
- @whatithink

I guess we'll just keep playing this game. Your turn.
 
Back
Top