So espola that rise after 2020 reflects people going back to work. Jobs the gov shut down...that after restrictions and handouts were over people started coming back to.Actually most of the jobs under Biden are people going back to jobs the gov had earlier shut down.
Our labor force participation rate is still not back where we were pre COVID.
I suspect you have little actual economic understanding.
View attachment 17987
Wrong again.So espola that rise after 2020 reflects people going back to work. Jobs the gov shut down...that after restrictions and handouts were over people started coming back to.
Which is why your chart showing Biden being the best recent job creator is to put it mildly misleading...and not true. But you and husker don't understand basic economics and so when presented with a chart like the one you posted go wow...
For once why don't you explain why I am wrong. Explain the labor force participation rate.Wrong again.
You're on a roll. Please continue.
You don't have to link to any story. Just review the thread in which my statement occurred.For once why don't you explain why I am wrong. Explain the labor force participation rate.
Make an argument for ONCE why my post is wrong. Don't link to a story. Try putting in words your argument
Your thing is always ...link.You don't have to link to any story. Just review the thread in which my statement occurred.
Your thing is always ...link.
What I and many here ask is...make a case. Defend your position. Make a point. Have a back and forth. It isn't about a link. You said you disagreed. Lay out your case as to why. Articulate a point.
So explain why you think the article you posted is correct?Wrong again. You're doing great. No one is laughing at you.
Unless you review the thread from a few pages back, you will not understand the context in which my statements were made.
Your thing is always ...link.
What I and many here ask is...make a case. Defend your position. Make a point. Have a back and forth. It isn't about a link. You said you disagreed. Lay out your case as to why. Articulate a point.
Wrong again. You're doing great. No one is laughing at you.
I didn't say the article was incorrect. It is, however, irrelevant (or at least repetitive) to the context of the discussion I was having with slobo.So explain why you think the article you posted is correct?
Defend your position
You have lies, and we correct you.
Yes, yes I see. You have “facts” you say. I’m sure you do, sure.
Wrong again.
You're on a roll. Please continue.
Build Back Better.LMAO! Name 1 thing Biden has done to create jobs.
You don't have to link to any story. Just review the thread in which my statement occurred.
Build Back Better.
Wrong again. You're doing great. No one is laughing at you.
Unless you review the thread from a few pages back, you will not understand the context in which my statements were made.