Chelsea dad g09
SILVER
Help me? You were the one asking for help, not me.If you wish to be seen as someone who makes unfounded accusations, go right ahead, but don't expect me to help you.
Help me? You were the one asking for help, not me.If you wish to be seen as someone who makes unfounded accusations, go right ahead, but don't expect me to help you.
Again, you're standing by an article written by a known liar funded by a partisan committee. Not my fault you didnt do your research and are now doubling down.The linked article you dislike so much shows several examples of situations where convicted felons had their gun-ownership rights restored under the "relief" principle originally intended by Congress to keep the gun manufacturer Winchester in business after their parent company Olin Mathiesen had been found guilty of an illegal kickback scheme involving the international trade in drugs. Do you think they just made up all those cases?
Here is a more detailed analysis of the "relief" law, published by the University of Chicago Legal Forum --
Again, you're standing by an article written by a known liar funded by a partisan committee. Not my fault you didnt do your research and are now doubling down.
Is your memory working now?You have made that claim twice. Or are you including the University of Chicago in your accusations now?
I understand that you are prejudiced against the organization. Can you find any errors in the linked article written with their support?
Ill make the claim a million times if you'd like. Maybe you ought to do your research before posting articles. The university of Chicago wasnt in the original article you posted so let's stay on topic before you confuse yourself again. I believe zero from any organization that is dishonest and partisan.You have made that claim twice. Or are you including the University of Chicago in your accusations now?
I understand that you are prejudiced against the organization. Can you find any errors in the linked article written with their support?
You don't like them (for reasons you will not elucidate), so you will not even look to see if what they are saying is true or not. That fits pretty well into the definition of "prejudice".Ill make the claim a million times if you'd like. Maybe you ought to do your research before posting articles. The university of Chicago wasnt in the original article you posted so let's stay on topic before you confuse yourself again. I believe zero from any organization that is dishonest and partisan.
Magoo is famous for twisting words/post. When confronted he will then double down and if that doesn't work he stops replying. After time, if it's brought up again, he'll try denying it or try spinning it again. He famously posted that Russia spies on all foreigners and wanted to know the urinal habits of guys on the forum. He's weird...Help me? You were the one asking for help, not me.
Theres the disconnect. I know they are dishonest and what I'm saying is true, you want me to show you and when I refuse, to make you do your own research you claim I'm prejudice. Sound about right?You don't like them (for reasons you will not elucidate), so you will not even look to see if what they are saying is true or not. That fits pretty well into the definition of "prejudice".
You "know" they are dishonest, but you refuse to say how you came to that knowledge.Theres the disconnect. I know they are dishonest and what I'm saying is true, you want me to show you and when I refuse, to make you do your own research you claim I'm prejudice. Sound about right?
I never understood your strange fixation with urinals.Magoo is famous for twisting words/post. When confronted he will then double down and if that doesn't work he stops replying. After time, if it's brought up again, he'll try denying it or try spinning it again. He famously posted that Russia spies on all foreigners and wanted to know the urinal habits of guys on the forum. He's weird...
By vetting articles before I post them. You should try it.You "know" they are dishonest, but you refuse to say how you came to that knowledge.
By that logic I should ask you if you know the authors of the articles you post are honest or you just post because it agrees with your viewpoint...would that make you prejudiced?You "know" they are dishonest, but you refuse to say how you came to that knowledge.
I understand that the author and the organization that published the article have a publicly-stated political position. Because of that, I looked into some of the claims made in the article and I could find no deliberate mistakes. How did your analysis of the article work out?By that logic I should ask you if you know the authors of the articles you post are honest or you just post because it agrees with your viewpoint...would that make you prejudiced?
Oh wait a minute -- you have already stated that --I understand that the author and the organization that published the article have a publicly-stated political position. Because of that, I looked into some of the claims made in the article and I could find no deliberate mistakes. How did your analysis of the article work out?
Careful, your prejudice is causing you to make assumptions. Where have you seen any of my political beliefs?Oh wait a minute -- you have already stated that --
"I believe zero from any organization that is dishonest and partisan."
How does that work out for you with the MAGA cult?
Every statement and position you take on these boards aligns about 100% with the current dem talking points of the day.I'm not a Democrat, so why would I have to own it?
The President can do nothing on that line without the help of Congress (assuming here that the Supreme Court will not upend the will of the people and Congress again).
The Democrats are one of the two big criminal organizations thwarting the will of the American people, the other being the Republicans. They should both be prosecuted under the RICO statute.
For those who care to look, it is intriguing to see your pro-guns-for-everyone messages in the trans athlete thread.Careful, your prejudice is causing you to make assumptions. Where have you seen any of my political beliefs?
I don't have to look outside San Diego County to find Democrats Bob Filner and Nathan Fletcher, both of whom blew promising careers because they couldn't keep their peckers under control.Well, I have to say it's pretty funny. I've been here a short time, especially compared to you, but I never see you criticize democrats even though they've been in power the last 2.5 years. Why is that?
Again where does it say what side of the aisle I am on? Furthermore where did you get the pro guns for everyone when I've stated the opposite?For those who care to look, it is intriguing to see your pro-guns-for-everyone messages in the trans athlete thread.