Passback -- or not???

Kicknit22 said:
Seriously JaP!? You had to create an alternate screen name to defend yourself. Unless this is daddy "Gimpyhip" on to defend his boy. Hmmmm? "Shove it in your pie hole" means exactly what it always has, because you are still wrong. link does nothing to confirm statements made by your boy JaP. Quite the contrary. Confirms My position entirely.

I have no problem letting someone know they were right, if they were. Nor do I have a problem admitting I am wrong. Neither applies in this thread.
Click to expand...
Oh, but it does. You are yet to learn the law.
 
Gimpyhip said:
Okay, to clarify the Laws on this and reduce the bickering I will try to help.

It is an Indirect Free Kick if a goalkeeper, inside of his own penalty area, "touches a ball with his hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate."

As espola said, if the keeper touches the ball with his hands outside of the penalty area, he is just like any other player and it is a direct free kick.

As JAP mentioned but did not explain, the law has nothing to do with passing. You will see players pass the ball to their own keeper all the time using their head or chest, which is perfectly legal.
Click to expand...
Or thigh, or knee or shin.
 
Kicknit22 said:
As I clarified earlier in this argument, I am referring ONLY to an intentional pass (from the foot) of a field player to thier own goalie, as being an infraction. I know heading is okay. I did NOT know using chest, knee or thigh was okay.
Click to expand...
Of course you are.
Kicknit22 said:
Do I need to clarify for you JrCeasar? Intentional pass WITH ANY PART OF THE BODY EXCEPT THE HEAD, to and picked up by the keeper, is a penalty. Disagree all you want, you'd be wrong.
Click to expand...
 
Kicknit22 said:
Oh, your good friend TIM. Who apparently goes by the pen name JIM. You're such an idiot.
BTW, you did remember to falsely state the rule.
Click to expand...
Your cohort knows I know the man.

By the way have you learnt it yet? He dumbed it down pretty well so it should be easy to understand it.

Or may be not for everyone . . .
 
Just a Parent said:
Your cohort knows I know the man.

By the way have you learnt it yet? He dumbed it down pretty well so it should be easy to understand it.

Or may be not for everyone . . .
Click to expand...
Doesn't change the fact that the link doesn't support your statements. Good friend? Laughable. I doubt someone like you has friends.
 
Kicknit22 said:
As I clarified earlier in this argument, I am referring ONLY to an intentional pass (from the foot) of a field player to thier own goalie, as being an infraction. I know heading is okay. I did NOT know using chest, knee or thigh was okay.
Click to expand...

So the semantics issue is that you keep referring to it as a rule (law) against an intentional pass but it is not. It is very specific that it is a deliberate kick and a pass has nothing to do with it. That is why the other parts of the body are generally okay as using them is not kicking.
 
Just reading the initial question and sounds like it was a deliberate pass to the keeper. If player passing was past midfield and was just trying to pass to another defender behind him then how the heck did it roll 60 yards all the way back?? Sounds like refs got it right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top