I have no doubt that you will continue to party like it’s 1999. Most of Phoenix will be like you. Other areas will mask up during covid/flu season and have less covid and flu.Masks are not going to be part of this either.
I have no doubt that you will continue to party like it’s 1999. Most of Phoenix will be like you. Other areas will mask up during covid/flu season and have less covid and flu.Masks are not going to be part of this either.
The virus and its variants are unpredictable, true. But those that are vulnerable and the outcomes of infection are very predictable. Our policies shouldn't revolve around the unpredictability of the virus, but revolve around those that are vulnerable to the virus.
Well because by the original definition that’s what Vaccines do. When are we going to stop calling this a vaccine and call it what it is, a preventative treatment or just a booster.
I have no doubt that you will continue to party like it’s 1999. Most of Phoenix will be like you. Other areas will mask up during covid/flu season and have less covid and flu.
I won't say I'm confident, but we should make decisions based on the best available data we have and not based upon speculation of a potential long term risk. When you do make decisions on potential long term risk, you often do so at the expense of actual long term negative impacts (ie like closing in-person education.)For the immediate short term I largely agree with you. I'll leave policy to others; there is no shortage of perspectives. I'm just glad I don't have to make those calls. Going forward, I hope your confidence in the predictability of who is and is not vulnerable remains well founded. The virus is evolving-amazing rapidly-and its virulence profile is under neither positive nor negative selection. The one perspective I will represent is that our kids will almost certainly be dealing with re-emergent features of this pandemic throughout their lifetimes. It's possible that we really should be calling omicron Cov-3.
For the immediate short term I largely agree with you. I'll leave policy to others; there is no shortage of perspectives. I'm just glad I don't have to make those calls. Going forward, I hope your confidence in the predictability of who is and is not vulnerable remains well founded. The virus is evolving-amazing rapidly-and its virulence profile is under neither positive nor negative selection. The one perspective I will represent is that our kids will almost certainly be dealing with re-emergent features of this pandemic throughout their lifetimes. It's possible that we really should be calling omicron Cov-3.
I’m what way is it a vaccine since it does not provide immunity to the disease for which it is intended?In what way is it not a vaccine?
I’m what way is it a vaccine since it does not provide immunity to the disease for which it is intended?
Benefits to WHO?No vaccine is 100% effective. This vaccine triggers a beneficial response in the human immune system just as intended. Playing around with word games is just politics.
Most people will say no thanks. By that I mean a majority of people. Bank on it.hat you've been accused of but have dodged: that you would like the new normal to be perpetual masking during covid/flu season. No thanks.
Like the new definition of "anti-vaxxer".No vaccine is 100% effective. This vaccine triggers a beneficial response in the human immune system just as intended. Playing around with word games is just politics.
That's funny. And the vaccines were never marketed as transmission blockers and immunity providers. You are a master of revionsist history.Playing around with word games is just politics.
Only lawyers make things complicated.The economics of this are incredibly complicated. You can’t just compare average wages since this like col and taxes come into play. The question is to what extent do union shop wages (the us doesn’t allow true closed shops) capture through bargaining more money which would otherwise be left on the table without adverse consequences (such as a decrease in supply of jobs which would be dictated by the supply curve). It’s complicated and there’s not a whole lot of consensus v an open shop (though definitely some against a non union shop). It’s whatever this capture is which is the benefit v the cost of forcing people to choose or lose their jobs that you’d analyze (because as we’ve established in this thread the c/b is everything). One thing to note is this analysis only works for a private employer where there is competition in the market. Otherwise it goes to the heart of the matter where we started this discussion: teachers unions trying to close schools (which is not a wage issue) and people having to join a union which stance they disagree with.
Less than prevailing wage.As was stated earlier, they know the T&C and can make their choice to “work for less” as you call it or look for work elsewhere. Guess the question I have is, less than what? $50k goes a lot further in some states than others.
I guess it's official now (sort of). Justice Gorsuch says SCOTUS discussion that flu causes hundreds of thousands of deaths every year.
CDC records --
![]()
Burden of Influenza
Learn about how CDC estimates the burden of seasonal influenza in the U.S.www.cdc.gov
Which prevailing wage? Mean, median, or mode?Less than prevailing wage.
Which prevailing wage? Mean, median, or mode?
Yes, some states actually use mode.