what-happened
GOLD
You are pretty good at this - not really engaging or providing anything foundational. Kinda like digging a foxhole in mud with a half functioning E-tool..Who are these tenants again? Maybe I should talk to them.
You are pretty good at this - not really engaging or providing anything foundational. Kinda like digging a foxhole in mud with a half functioning E-tool..Who are these tenants again? Maybe I should talk to them.
This is not the time for Tortilla chip projectiles!!Here is some more of that good ole can we all just get along stuff.
Nah...just kidding. Blaming whites and creating division is now on the up and up.
And before you say...some poster off Twitter? No the Smithsonian had this up and only took it down after much deserved criticism. Despite their temporary setback...they will continue on with this madness.
View attachment 11049
Is this going to be placed in a 3rd grade syllabus in Louden County, VA?
Now have a listen to the right shoulderThe AMHAAC poster includes many items and I see many of them as unarguably admirable traits. I'm surprised about DH's "shocked" response since the poster doesn't say anywhere that those observations about American life are bad things, it just points out that they exist.
I have a piece of property in Florida that I will sell you cheap. It's waterfront, unobstructed views, very quiet, diverse wildlife, no neighbors...all admirable traits for a property.The AMHAAC poster includes many items and I see many of them as unarguably admirable traits. I'm surprised about DH's "shocked" response since the poster doesn't say anywhere that those observations about American life are bad things, it just points out that they exist.
Per usual you don't actual make a case for what you believe.A few points --
You didn't identify the source of your quotes.
You are asking me to defend your obvious misinterpretation of the theories you quote. Why would you think I would do that? Are you just being argumentative to cover up your ignorance?
Who are the "actual tenants"?
No worries.Sorry Hound, comment not directed at you, but at the creator of the poster.The poster is wholly inappropriate, its not favorable to either blacks or whites. It just shows you the power of a group think narrative that the Smithsonian would even consider putting it up. An example of the dangers of pure political correctness. I don't see how separating us into monolithic groups does anything to help combat racism.
That is what he always does.You are pretty good at this - not really engaging or providing anything foundational. Kinda like digging a foxhole in mud with a half functioning E-tool..
I have a piece of property in Florida that I will sell you cheap. It's waterfront, unobstructed views, very quiet, diverse wildlife, no neighbors...all admirable traits for a property.
That is what he always does.
He never actually makes an argument pro or against anything. So there is no engagement on his part.
Best thing to do is IGNORE….unless, of course, you enjoy playing his little games.That is what he always does.
He never actually makes an argument pro or against anything. So there is no engagement on his part.
The AMHAAC poster includes many items and I see many of them as unarguably admirable traits. I'm surprised about DH's "shocked" response since the poster doesn't say anywhere that those observations about American life are bad things, it just points out that they exist.
Yeah, that was a pretty weak diversion on my part, I could learn a few pointers from you if I paid more attention.Your attempt at a diversion will not fend off the next question -- Which of the traits in the poster do you not find to be admirable?
Wonderful. Any kind of learning is ok?
For my CRT classes, I will focus on prime factorization, fractions, and long division.
Grades will be issued solely on the basis of written work. To assure an absence of racial bias, exams will be graded without cover sheets, and no partial credit will be given. Because of the possibility of unconscious bias in the school administration, all promotion decisions are algorithmic and not subject to appeal: any students below 65% will repeat the class, regardless of race, gender, or ethnic origin.
Maybe you want to be a smidge clearer than “it’s about learning”. I don’t think most CRT proponents would care for the above class.
Per usual you don't actual make a case for what you believe.
You usual song and dance. You criticize something and then when asked to articulate what you believe you move on to more questions.
Tell me why you are defending CRT.
Try that.
Yeah, that was a pretty weak diversion on my part, I could learn a few pointers from you if I paid more attention.
How are they just attributing them to just white people? The poster is specific to white people. I'd assume that if they have one for Asians, Hispanics or Black Americans, they could repeat many or all the same traits.The poster is ignorant on so many levels. To attribute these traits to jus white people is offensive on so many levels. Hard work, self reliance, etc is a white trait? Don't tell that to Asians, Hispanics, and Black Americans - I'm sure I left someone out. I'm fine with academics having less than intellectual debates. I'm also fine with ridiculing the crap out of things like this - because it's dumb.
I sure as hell hope not. While there are admirable traits in the poster that aren't inherent to any race there are some blatant stereotypes. Skinny blond girls? Even if it were remotely true its irrelevant to the conversation. The poster clearly presents whiteness in the pejorative. The idea that there are other race counter-points to these traits based on stereotyping to be put on a poster is disturbing.How are they just attributing them to just white people? The poster is specific to white people. I'd assume that if they have one for Asians, Hispanics or Black Americans, they could repeat many or all the same traits.
I’ll let the General enlighten the class