Climate and Weather

What makes you think they are diverging?
It looks like they are diverging.
Interestingly enough, more so after 2006. (the date of the link you posted explaining satellite data corrections)
From 06 to present, there seems to be a marked divergence between satellite and surface temps.
The two forms of measurement parallel each other fairly closely, with satellite temps running slightly cooler, (yet consistently mirroring) except for the peak in '98.
For some reason, a glitch there shows both the satellite and surface temps reaching an unprecedented consensus.
 
It looks like they are diverging.
Interestingly enough, more so after 2006. (the date of the link you posted explaining satellite data corrections)
From 06 to present, there seems to be a marked divergence between satellite and surface temps.
The two forms of measurement parallel each other fairly closely, with satellite temps running slightly cooler, (yet consistently mirroring) except for the peak in '98.
For some reason, a glitch there shows both the satellite and surface temps reaching an unprecedented consensus.

Tell me more about what you seem to see, especially the "glitch".

You didn't use the trend line analysis available in the website.

Have figured out yet what you meant by "classical liberalism"?
 
America loves to be lied to and he was the best by a long shot... Mine was a blocking vote only, I couldn't stand HRC.

Wez said:
Mine was a blocking vote only, I couldn't stand HRC


pile_of_shit.gif



You sure do go for records....I gotta give you that.
 
From that definition - "civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedoms found in economic liberalism which is also called free market capitalism" We're not doing that now?
You must read things in context, magoo.
I was replying to rat, after he stated all the great things liberalism has done for humanity, and how conservatism has caused pestilence, death, and wailing. (paraphrasing)
I replied that what is passing for liberalism today, has no resemblance to "classic liberalism", but is rather a kind of "neo-communism" (again paraphrasing)
Classic liberalism has some very noble traits.
Again, what passes for liberalism today is some type of progressive communism.
 
You must read things in context, magoo.
I was replying to rat, after he stated all the great things liberalism has done for humanity, and how conservatism has caused pestilence, death, and wailing. (paraphrasing)
I replied that what is passing for liberalism today, has no resemblance to "classic liberalism", but is rather a kind of "neo-communism" (again paraphrasing)
Classic liberalism has some very noble traits.
Again, what passes for liberalism today is some type of progressive communism.

What do you mean by "progressive communism" in that context?
 
You must read things in context, magoo.
I was replying to rat, after he stated all the great things liberalism has done for humanity, and how conservatism has caused pestilence, death, and wailing. (paraphrasing)
I replied that what is passing for liberalism today, has no resemblance to "classic liberalism", but is rather a kind of "neo-communism" (again paraphrasing)
Classic liberalism has some very noble traits.
Again, what passes for liberalism today is some type of progressive communism.
. . . and Trumpism is a far, far cry from Reagan. (I feel bad even putting those two's names in the same sentence! and you know I'm not a great Reagan fan)
 
. . . and Trumpism is a far, far cry from Reagan. (I feel bad even putting those two's names in the same sentence! and you know I'm not a great Reagan fan)

He won, and liberals hate him, so he must be their guy. Fuck all that original constitution and bill of rights stuff.
 
Looks like between rat and espola, they have all the answers.
Divergence in climate temps and divergence in political definitions.
Thanks for the input, guys.
Ill think about it and let you answer for me when I get ready.
 
Back
Top