The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

You didn’t read it either. If you had, you’d know exactly the 10 articulated acts of obstruction of justice Trump committed, and exactly why Mueller declined to indict a sitting president.
The plumbers sources don't tell him the full story, and he's fine with that. Like t he doesn't even want to read the Readers Digest version, they like books with pictures.
 
You didn’t read it either. If you had, you’d know exactly the 10 articulated acts of obstruction of justice Trump committed, and exactly why Mueller declined to indict a sitting president.
You go with that.
Why was slick willie charged with real crimes when he got impeached?

I posted the impeachable offense. post #19213
 
Its not a "Bill did worse" defense.
Its just a fact. Bill was impeached for actual crimes.
Not some screaming leftist in a green jacket.

Dont let me dissuade you though.
I love the grassy knoll shit.
Well. Now that you’re angry, let’s try a little lesson in actual facts. Obstruction of Justice is an actual federal crime. It was articulated, analyzed and concluded with respect to ten separate criminal acts perpetrated by Trump in an exhaustive report you still have not read.

You claim you read it. My opinion is you are a liar.
 
Well. Now that you’re angry, let’s try a little lesson in actual facts. Obstruction of Justice is an actual federal crime. It was articulated, analyzed and concluded with respect to ten separate criminal acts perpetrated by Trump in an exhaustive report you still have not read.

You claim you read it. My opinion is you are a liar.
Not angry, bro.
Did I claim I read it?
No, and I dont plan on it until I reread War and Peace a couple more times. (priorities).
I did read your report and was not impressed with the content, although the flourishes were not altogether terrible.
Dont forget to breath....
regards,

-giver-
 
Not angry, bro.
Did I claim I read it?
No, and I dont plan on it until I reread War and Peace a couple more times. (priorities).
I did read your report and was not impressed with the content, although the flourishes were not altogether terrible.
Dont forget to breath....
regards,

-giver-

If you didn't read it, who told you it was no good?
 
Not angry, bro.
Did I claim I read it?
No, and I dont plan on it until I reread War and Peace a couple more times. (priorities).
I did read your report and was not impressed with the content, although the flourishes were not altogether terrible.
Dont forget to breath....
regards,

-giver-
Do you know who I am?

I'm No Greene!

I made my bones when you were going out with cheerleaders.
 
Well. Now that you’re angry, let’s try a little lesson in actual facts. Obstruction of Justice is an actual federal crime. It was articulated, analyzed and concluded with respect to ten separate criminal acts perpetrated by Trump in an exhaustive report you still have not read.

You claim you read it. My opinion is you are a liar.
Are you an attorney?
 
That's the question before the various House committees investigating. Obstruction of justice is obvious to anyone who is looking honestly at the findings.
It wasn't obvious to Mueller and that's what he does...
You think the ship of fools in Congress will find what Mueller did not?
Well of course you do...
 
Has anybody ever been exonerated for something you were never accused of or charged with?
Evidence of a crime is needed in order to charge someone with that crime.

Mueller did report:
“The evidence we obtained about the president’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
 
Back
Top