The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
Wait... I'm starting to get a nagging feeling North Korea might not just give up all their nukes due to Mr Trump's exceptional negotiating skills. Could that possibly be true? Didn't Mr. Kim read the Art of the Deal?
Hey, how's that Iraqi election going anyway? Big reward for defeating ISIS?
Oh well, at least we're winning in Jerusalum....
Hey, how's that Iraqi election going anyway? Big reward for defeating ISIS?
Oh well, at least we're winning in Jerusalum....
So far you're batting 1.000 when it comes to all things Trump.......
Here is an official translation of a statement released by the Korean Central News Agency of North Korea on Wednesday.
Kim Jong Un, the chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, made a strategic decision to put an end to the unpleasant steps for peace and stability in the Korean peninsula and the world.
In response to the noble intention of Chairman Kim Jong Un, President Trump stated his position for terminating the historically deep-rooted hostility and improving the relations between DPRK and the U.S.
I appreciated the position positively with an expectation that upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit would be a big step forward for catalyzing detente on the Korean peninsula and building a great future.
But now prior to the DPRK-U.S. summit, unbridled remarks provoking the other side of dialogue are recklessly made in the U.S. and I am totally disappointed as these constitute extremely unjust behavior.
High-ranking officials of the White House and the Department of State including Bolton, White House national security adviser, are letting loose the assertions of so-called Libya mode of nuclear abandonment, “complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization,” “total decommissioning of nuclear weapons, missiles and biochemical weapons” etc. while talking about formula of “abandoning nuclear weapons first, compensating afterwards.”
This is not an expression of intention to address the issue through dialogue. It is essentially a manifestation of awfully sinister move to impose on our dignified state the destiny of Libya or Iraq which had been collapsed due to yielding the whole of their countries to big powers.
I cannot suppress indignation at such moves of the U.S., and harbor doubt about the U.S. sincerity for improved DPRK-U.S. relations through sound dialogue and negotiations.
World knows too well that our country is neither Libya nor Iraq which have met miserable fate.
It is absolutely absurd to dare compare the DPRK, a nuclear weapon state, to Libya which had been at the initial state of nuclear development.
We shed light on the quality of Bolton already in the past, and we do not hide our feelings of repugnance towards him.
(and to think I once said I couldn't imagine agreeing with Kim or North Korea on anything - yet it's as if they read my mind!)
If the Trump administration fails to recall the lessons learned from the past when the DPRK-U.S. talks had to undergo twists and setbacks owing to the likes of Bolton and turns its ear to the advice of quasi-”patriots” who insist on Libya mode and the like, prospects of upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit and overall DPRK-U.S. relations will be crystal clear.
We have already stated our intention of denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and made clear on several occasions that precondition for denuclearization is to put an end to anti-DPRK hostile policy and nuclear threats and blackmail of the United States.
etc etc etc....
Kim Jong Un, the chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, made a strategic decision to put an end to the unpleasant steps for peace and stability in the Korean peninsula and the world.
In response to the noble intention of Chairman Kim Jong Un, President Trump stated his position for terminating the historically deep-rooted hostility and improving the relations between DPRK and the U.S.
I appreciated the position positively with an expectation that upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit would be a big step forward for catalyzing detente on the Korean peninsula and building a great future.
But now prior to the DPRK-U.S. summit, unbridled remarks provoking the other side of dialogue are recklessly made in the U.S. and I am totally disappointed as these constitute extremely unjust behavior.
High-ranking officials of the White House and the Department of State including Bolton, White House national security adviser, are letting loose the assertions of so-called Libya mode of nuclear abandonment, “complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization,” “total decommissioning of nuclear weapons, missiles and biochemical weapons” etc. while talking about formula of “abandoning nuclear weapons first, compensating afterwards.”
This is not an expression of intention to address the issue through dialogue. It is essentially a manifestation of awfully sinister move to impose on our dignified state the destiny of Libya or Iraq which had been collapsed due to yielding the whole of their countries to big powers.
I cannot suppress indignation at such moves of the U.S., and harbor doubt about the U.S. sincerity for improved DPRK-U.S. relations through sound dialogue and negotiations.
World knows too well that our country is neither Libya nor Iraq which have met miserable fate.
It is absolutely absurd to dare compare the DPRK, a nuclear weapon state, to Libya which had been at the initial state of nuclear development.
We shed light on the quality of Bolton already in the past, and we do not hide our feelings of repugnance towards him.
(and to think I once said I couldn't imagine agreeing with Kim or North Korea on anything - yet it's as if they read my mind!)
If the Trump administration fails to recall the lessons learned from the past when the DPRK-U.S. talks had to undergo twists and setbacks owing to the likes of Bolton and turns its ear to the advice of quasi-”patriots” who insist on Libya mode and the like, prospects of upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit and overall DPRK-U.S. relations will be crystal clear.
We have already stated our intention of denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and made clear on several occasions that precondition for denuclearization is to put an end to anti-DPRK hostile policy and nuclear threats and blackmail of the United States.
etc etc etc....
So far you're batting 1.000 when it comes to all things Trump.......
You following the Iraqi election.
Does that mean t has to give back the Nobel Peace Prize?
The one that indicates Iraqi independence from outside influences?
What about it?
Last edited:
I think he's asking how many trillions in US taxpayer dollars did we spend truning Iraq into an Iranian puppet?
From what I've read Moktada al-Sadr wants to shake up his government & clean up the corruption and is described in the New York Times as a "patriot who rails against outside interference by Iran as well as America".
Oh... yes well that quote totally makes it okay that Trump scheduled moving the Isreali embassy to Jerusalem on the same day as the Iraqi vote for president. I mean why not just call over and tell the Ayatollah he'd decided to give them Iraq on a silver platter. I mean we've put what was it... $5 or $6 Trillion into rebuilding it so you can imagine what the place is worth.
Good grief.
Just wondering if you were. Remember the Sadr Brigades? I do. Ever looked at a map of Iraq? Ever looked at who it shares borders with? Better hope we tell Ankara to go stuff their tin pot dictator and start propping up the Kurds.
In unrelated news, it's so interesting Novartis' legal counsel stepped down today. What a coincidence.
Hm... So you don't remember the Sadr brigades? Or who they fought against in Baghdad? Ok...
Maybe you know them by their other name, the Mahdi Army... or maybe you don't know anyone serving in Baghdad. I do...
https://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/57
I got to return to this. We are a nation of idiots. Truly.
Google JAM, Mahdi Army, Battle of Sadr City 2004, 2007 or 2008. Or just watch 60 Minutes or "the Long Road Home."
Does anyone actually know anything about the various wars we keep letting our soldiers get killed in? Unbelievable.
Where did Sadr go when he went into exile? The Poconos? Saudi Arabia? Cancun?
The election success of Sadr and the Iraqi Communists - and more important the failure of Maliki and the US supported government (and the low-turnout, which indicates an abadonment of the political process in general) promises more instability, in fighting and division. Look at Afghanistan, Syria and Lybia. Add Iraqi. It's gonna be the 100 year's war.
Sheriff Joe
DA
'A Certain Fishiness'
Clinton Campaign Funneled $150,000 To Hillary's Personal Company
Investigative Group | Andrew Kerr
Clinton Campaign Funneled $150,000 To Hillary's Personal Company
Investigative Group | Andrew Kerr
Sheriff Joe
DA
Hüsker Dü
DA
Israel? You mean where Trump gave away our bargaining power with the embassy giveaway move? No concessions from either side, some great deal maker he is, not.
Congratulations...
I know several folks that served in Iraq....now what?
The Palestinians don't want peace.
They can't win a war against Israel, yet they won't compromise.
Firstly, here's what the United States policy was before now
Confusingly, the US Congress passed a law in 1995 called the Jerusalem Embassy Act which described Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and said it should not be divided.
That law required the US embassy to be moved to Jerusalem by 1999.
But this hasn't happened because every six months, successive presidents have signed a waiver to keep the US embassy in Tel Aviv for national security reasons.
As well, successive presidents have backed negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on the status of Jerusalem.
However, that's not always what they said before they took office.
In 2008, then Democratic candidate Barack Obama called Jerusalem the 'capital of Israel'
In 2000, then Republican candidate George W Bush promised to move the US embassy to Jerusalem
In 1993, former president Bill Clinton also came to office saying he supported 'the principle' of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-...dents-said-about-israel-and-jerusalem/9234736
Ask them about the Mahdi Army, the Peace Brigades, the battle for Sadr City 2004, 2007 and 2008, JAM, Sadr Brigades, then ask them if they think the election of a coaltion of the "Peace Brigades" and Iraqi Communists to a plurality or possible coalition majority of Iraqi parlament seats is good or bad for US forces in Iraq.
I will be very interested in what they have to say. Let us know.
Sheriff Joe
DA
All those 3 lacked were balls.