Bruddah IZ
DA
SuckerPaul Ryan broke the First Amendment if he fired the House Chaplain because he didn't like the way the Chaplain said a prayer, but House Republicans voted down the possibility of finding out the facts.
SuckerPaul Ryan broke the First Amendment if he fired the House Chaplain because he didn't like the way the Chaplain said a prayer, but House Republicans voted down the possibility of finding out the facts.
Actually, Mattis seems more like the intelligent, more than qualified, compassionate leader the Republican Party has historically selected, at least in 1952, ‘56, ‘76, ‘80, ‘84, ‘88, ‘92, ‘08, and ‘12, notwithstanding several unqualified and/or insane VP selections that thankfully contributed in some measure to drag the ticket to a lose, or the boss lived out his term(s).Should have been easy for Dumbmacrats to nominate such a person.
Actually, Mattis seems more like the intelligent, more than qualified, compassionate leader the Republican Party has historically selected, at least in 1952, ‘56, ‘76, ‘80, ‘84, ‘88, ‘92, ‘08, and ‘12, notwithstanding several unqualified and/or insane VP selections that thankfully contributed in some measure to drag the ticket to a lose, or the boss lived out his term(s).
Ford was ok. It’s all relative now. Pardoning Nixon was the electability kiss of death, but I believe for its time, it was the right decision for the good of the country.'76?
Ford was ok. It’s all relative now. Pardoning Nixon was the electability kiss of death, but I believe for its time, it was the right decision for the good of the country.
Pardons until Arpaio I think were all at the end of a President’s tenure, and I think went through the traditional DOJ vetting process, notwithstanding the few controversial bad eggs that slipped through by presidents of both parties.Bad precedent. Now people believe that Presidents get a free ride no matter what they do.
Yes, just ask Clinton.Bad precedent. Now people believe that Presidents get a free ride no matter what they do.
Yes, just ask Clinton.
About Mr Rich.Ask him what?
I think I wrote “both parties”. Let me check.About Mr Rich.
I think I was replying to E, let me check, yeah, E.I think I wrote “both parties”. Let me check.
Yes, “both parties”. Check.
You don’t read so well. Like your forum namesake. A federal court order. He didn’t read it. Then later didn’t read the terms of his pardon. Reading is important.
Then perhaps you mistakenly posted on an open forum, rather than a private message to him, or have had to grasp at that wisp of straw to attempt to construct your feeble retort.I think I was replying to E, let me check, yeah, E.
Are you talking to me? I guess you are over your little bitch fit that lead you to put me on ignore.Then perhaps you mistakenly posted on an open forum, rather than a private message to him, or have had to grasp at that wisp of straw to attempt to construct your feeble retort.
I did note however that although you singled out Marc Rich, one of several controversial pardons, you seemed to have left off Jimmy Hoffa, Cap Weinburger, George Steinbrenner, Scooter Libby, and your forum namesake hero. Interesting.
I’m writing “interesting” in my notes.
Is there any objectivity to your way of thinking? Any?
Obfuscation. A common response when civil discourse is too taxing on one’s mental fitness.Are you talking to me? I guess you are over your little bitch fit that lead you to put me on ignore.
My lucky day.
Due to your fragile nature, I can no longer, in good conscience contribute to your declining metal state.Obfuscation. A common response when civil discourse is too taxing on one’s mental fitness.
I take it the “bug” refers to posts. A quick review of post totals has your usual gang of idiots at a collective count of over 40,000 posts since this latest iteration of the soccer/opinion forum rise from the ashes. Your own contribution to that 40,000 plus is a combined 6,000 plus between Fandango and Sanders.Looks like 5nos has caught the husker bug.
Two shots of Booker 130 proof and a red pill oughta fix it.
“mental” state. Not metal state. When you’re insulting someone as mentally inferior to you, it’s often considered important not to misspell simple English words.Due to your fragile nature, I can no longer, in good conscience contribute to your declining metal state.
My post are too complicated for a simpleton to follow.
I figured it would be easier for you to understand.“mental” state. Not metal state. When you’re insulting someone as mentally inferior to you, it’s often considered important not to misspell simple English words.