All things disgusting with and around dump
- Thread starter Wez
- Start date
Wez
DA
...and the pussy patrol comes in.
*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
Sheriff Joe
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Hüsker Dü
DA
Obviously, you "think" what you are told to.
Sheriff Joe
DA
The Oscars were last night?
Bruddah IZ
DA
Youʻve always been an advocate for lower taxes. Thatʻs what I like about you.
Bruddah IZ
DA
#youtoo?
Wow lambchops, perhaps had you read the WP article you might know what you're responding too.
Perhaps now that you have stomped your feet and are over your little fit... you'll realize she's talking about 2027....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-for-the-middle-class/?utm_term=.2cf439a81576
McCaskill’s statement:
“It’s a debt-inducing, make-rich-people-richer tax bill that in the long run is not going to be helpful to the vast majority of people in my state that are sitting around the kitchen table trying to figure out how [to] come out even at the end of the month.”
Notice how she slipped in the phrase “in the long run.” That terminology is intended to allow her to skip past any possible near-term gains.
Indeed, her staff defended her comment by focusing on her “long run” language. This brings us to an oddity of the tax bill: the individual tax cuts expire over the course of the decade. Republicans did this to keep the whole tax cut — especially the corporate tax cut — in a budget box that allowed only for a $1.5 trillion increase in the federal deficit over 10 years.
The assumption — possibly a big one — is that Congress will vote to extend the tax cuts when they begin to expire, just as most of the George W. Bush tax cuts were extended, with the support of Democrats like McCaskill. Her staff declined to answer a question as to whether she would support extending the tax cuts for individuals in the Trump tax bill.
But the law is the law, and it certainly is within McCaskill’s right to focus on the 2027 tax tables produced by JCT and TPC that show the tax cuts shrinking or even disappearing for tens of millions of Americans.
Wez
DA
Here kid, we're going to cut our taxes (mine a lot more then yours of course), your tax cut will end in the future, but let's both enjoy it now while it lasts, ok? Thanks for supporting my permanent tax cut btw...
Nonononono
PREMIER
Rare archival moment in Trump's fantasy of when America was still great.
Wez
DA
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...e=fb&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t
Local News Anchors Are Being Forced to Deliver Pro-Trump Propaganda
"When Trump took office, Sinclair was on the cusp of purchasing Tribune media, a merger that would give the firm ownership of enough local stations to reach 70 percent of U.S. homes. But there were two obstacles to such a deal: Federal rules put a cap on the number of local news stations any single entity could own, and also prohibited any company from owning a newspaper and television station in the same media market. Taking on Tribune’s assets would put Sinclair in violation of both those laws.
But by the end of Trump’s first year in office, his appointees to the Federal Communications Commission had abolished both of those regulations. And so, in all probability, a single, superrich family of arch-conservatives will soon dictate standards of “journalistic responsibility” to local TV newsrooms from coast to coast."
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...e=fb&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t
Local News Anchors Are Being Forced to Deliver Pro-Trump Propaganda
"When Trump took office, Sinclair was on the cusp of purchasing Tribune media, a merger that would give the firm ownership of enough local stations to reach 70 percent of U.S. homes. But there were two obstacles to such a deal: Federal rules put a cap on the number of local news stations any single entity could own, and also prohibited any company from owning a newspaper and television station in the same media market. Taking on Tribune’s assets would put Sinclair in violation of both those laws.
But by the end of Trump’s first year in office, his appointees to the Federal Communications Commission had abolished both of those regulations. And so, in all probability, a single, superrich family of arch-conservatives will soon dictate standards of “journalistic responsibility” to local TV newsrooms from coast to coast."
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...e=fb&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t
Sheriff Joe
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Wez
DA
FoxNews is very popular with very little credibility. This is about normalizing and weaponizing false information.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/t...ast-trusted-news-sources-in-the-us-2017-08-03
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jan/29/punditfact-checks-cable-news-channels/
*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
What a bunch of garbage. You have Bill O Riley from 2015 and claiming CNN to be 80% reliable or somewhat and then you have another 2015 article that has CNN as one not trusted by this survey "said to have leaned toward the liberal side of the political spectrum.
Do you read this nonsense before posting? Do you have conversations with people and spew this BS as truth? Lordy, lordy.