Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals....Read these, This is what the Democrats are Using RIGHT NOW !!!

Here is the complete list from Alinsky.

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”

It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)



RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”
  • Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

    RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

    If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

    RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

    There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

    RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

    They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

    RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

    Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

    RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

    Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

    RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

    Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

    RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

    Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

    RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

    Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

    RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

    Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

 
Here is the complete list from Alinsky.

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”

It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)



RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”



    • Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

      RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

      If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

      RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

      There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

      RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

      They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

      RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

      Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

      RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

      Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

      RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

      Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

      RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

      Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

      RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

      Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

      RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

      Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
Now this is something Obama deserves credit for.
 
Here is the complete list from Alinsky.

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”

It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)



RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”



    • Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

      RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

      If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

      RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

      There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

      RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

      They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

      RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

      Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

      RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

      Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

      RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

      Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

      RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

      Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

      RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

      Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

      RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

      Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
Here is the ultimate test to finally confirm whether or not 4nos is in fact 5nos. Unfortunately 4nos is incompetent as a character to post anything with candor or honesty.

Question 1: 4nos, did you copy and paste that long and completely unread post above which I dare anyone to admit they read in total?

Question 2: If you answered question 1 in the negative, and therefore composed the entire post from your own thoughts and opinions, please report the the Big Nurse’s station immediately for additional sedatives.

Question 3: If you did compose that entirely unread post by everyone, and you are not within a judicially ordered mental confinement facility as implied in question 3, you are instead in a sparsely furnished cabin aboard a ship headed to an alien planet that Earth’s finest linguists were only able to determine the title of an alien species book “To Serve Man” presented to humanity, that is actually not what it first appeared to represent.

Dinner is served. Please eat. They don’t want you to be thin upon your arrival.
 
Here is the ultimate test to finally confirm whether or not 4nos is in fact 5nos. Unfortunately 4nos is incompetent as a character to post anything with candor or honesty.

Question 1: 4nos, did you copy and paste that long and completely unread post above which I dare anyone to admit they read in total?

Question 2: If you answered question 1 in the negative, and therefore composed the entire post from your own thoughts and opinions, please report the the Big Nurse’s station immediately for additional sedatives.

Question 3: If you did compose that entirely unread post by everyone, and you are not within a judicially ordered mental confinement facility as implied in question 3, you are instead in a sparsely furnished cabin aboard a ship headed to an alien planet that Earth’s finest linguists were only able to determine the title of an alien species book “To Serve Man” presented to humanity, that is actually not what it first appeared to represent.

Dinner is served. Please eat. They don’t want you to be thin upon your arrival.
I have 4nos as your equal and opposite anti matter soul mate.
I give him the edge because he is right more often than you are.
A lot more often.
You are very creative though.
 
Here is the ultimate test to finally confirm whether or not 4nos is in fact 5nos. Unfortunately 4nos is incompetent as a character to post anything with candor or honesty.

Question 1: 4nos, did you copy and paste that long and completely unread post above which I dare anyone to admit they read in total?

Question 2: If you answered question 1 in the negative, and therefore composed the entire post from your own thoughts and opinions, please report the the Big Nurse’s station immediately for additional sedatives.

Question 3: If you did compose that entirely unread post by everyone, and you are not within a judicially ordered mental confinement facility as implied in question 3, you are instead in a sparsely furnished cabin aboard a ship headed to an alien planet that Earth’s finest linguists were only able to determine the title of an alien species book “To Serve Man” presented to humanity, that is actually not what it first appeared to represent.

Dinner is served. Please eat. They don’t want you to be thin upon your arrival.


What a fuckin Idiot....
 
In the " In " box of every Republican ......

The Rules for Radicals ....so they are current on the Scums tactics...
 
Damn lying Republican politicians . . . and their naive, gullible constituents!

A political novice who rode his profile as an outsider-adventurer to the Republican nomination in a competitive Kansas congressional district is facing scrutiny about some of the biographical details he shares with voters.

Steve Watkins' campaign website featured a since-removed testimonial to his "heroic leadership" when a deadly earthquake shook Mount Everest during an expedition. He has acknowledged inaccurately claiming that he started a Middle East business, expanding it from three to 470 people. And there are doubts about Watkins' self-description as a devoted, sixth-generation Kansan.

Even before Watkins won the crowded primary to succeed retiring GOP Rep. Lynn Jenkins in eastern Kansas' 2nd District, some fellow Republicans were skeptical. One former GOP foe, state Sen. Steve Fitzgerald, called him "a charlatan, a fraud and an opportunist," though he now won't criticize him.

Watkins' campaign website calls him "an accomplished athlete and explorer," citing his 2015 attempt to be the first person to race in the Iditarod and scale Mount Everest in the same year.

In that year's 1,000-mile (1,609-kilometer) dogsled race as a rookie, he finished 58th out of 78. Watkins started the race in March 2018 but didn't finish.

His 2015 expedition on the world's tallest mountain was cut short by an earthquake in Nepal that killed nearly 8,900 people. Watkins' website previously quoted Everest outfitter Guy Cotter as saying he relied on Watkins' "heroic leadership amid the chaos." Watkins said it was in response to his calm and the moral support he offered his group of stranded climbers.

Cotter told The Associated Press that he never said it and was unaware Watkins had put the quote on his campaign website. It was removed after the AP questioned Watkins about Cotter's comments.

"There was not really anything heroic to be able to do," Cotter said in a phone interview from New Zealand. "We all felt quite hopeless ... because we were not there, where all the injured and dying people were, through that event. We were actually up on the mountain, so there was very little we could contribute."

Watkins said: "I captured the statement, to the best of my memory. He and I spoke frequently and often when we were up there, and he shared the sentiment."

As for the Iditarod, four-time winner Jeff King saw Watkins' entry this year as a stunt for his political campaign and Watkins' self-portrayal as an adventurer as a "gigantic fallacy."

Musher Tara Cicatello was at the back of the pack with Watkins, and both were forced to quit 11 days into the contest because they were so far behind. She said Watkins' chief concern after being forced to withdraw was the publicity he had lined up. He was on the phone talking about speaking engagements and left the dogs that had carried him more than 700 miles in the care of people who were already overwhelmed with other dogs, she said.

"People were irritated with Steve because they were doing more work for his dogs than he was," Cicatello said. "I don't think he mistreated them. It just sounds like he was all about his campaign and the show of it than the actual doing of it."

Watkins said he entered the 2018 dogsled race because he believed it could be his last chance to compete.

Recently the Kansas City Star reported that while Watkins claimed to have started a company and built it from scratch, in fact he joined an existing company as a contractor. To explain the discrepancy, Watkins said he helped create products and services for the company's clients.

And public records show the 42-year-old Army veteran hadn't lived in Kansas since he left high school — nearly two decades before returning to the state last year to run for Congress. During the AP interview, he acknowledged a "transient" life.

"It was exciting, and it was dangerous, challenging and meaningful," he said.

Military records show Watkins spent five years on active duty with the Army, including six months in Afghanistan. His work as a contractor began late in 2004.

He said his priorities shifted after being injured as a contractor in Afghanistan in 2013. In a 2015 Washington Post interview, he described it as a traumatic brain injury and also said he'd been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder nearly a decade earlier. He told AP the 2013 injury was a "tipping point" that pushed him toward "a more conventional life" but would not discuss details.

Watkins said Kansas "was always home in my heart." However, he applied 11 times between 2002 and 2015 for the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend, a payment to those who have lived in the state for a full year and say they intend to remain indefinitely.

Property records show Watkins owns two condos in Alaska, purchased in 2005 and 2015, while the Topeka residence on his voter registration is rented.

Days before Watkins won the seven-candidate August primary, 40 local Republican leaders signed an open letter expressing concerns including his absence from the district. Some GOP leaders also were wary of him after three Democrats said publicly that he met with them last year about running as a Democrat — something he strongly disputes.

Many GOP doubters have since endorsed him because the stakes for the party are high. Even though President Donald Trump won the district by nearly 17 percentage points in 2016, Democrats see the seat as a prime opportunity. Watkins' better-known Democratic opponent, attorney and former Kansas House minority leader Paul Davis, carried the district when he narrowly lost the 2014 governor's race.

Davis has his own baggage after representing a legislative district in the liberal-for-Kansas city of Lawrence. Republicans have revived a 1998 incident in which Davis, then a 26-year-old attorney, was present during a drug raid at a strip club while visiting its owner, a client. Police did not accuse him of wrongdoing.

But in nominating Watkins, the GOP took a risk because he's not been active politically until now, said Bob Beatty, a Washburn University of Topeka political scientist.

"The party does not know what he was doing in Alaska and in the other places he lived," Beatty said. "It may be a good leap of faith, but it's still a leap of faith."

6a6fd124-c670-11e8-a27d-25eda8586eb5
 
Damn lying Republican politicians . . . and their naive, gullible constituents!

A political novice who rode his profile as an outsider-adventurer to the Republican nomination in a competitive Kansas congressional district is facing scrutiny about some of the biographical details he shares with voters.

Steve Watkins' campaign website featured a since-removed testimonial to his "heroic leadership" when a deadly earthquake shook Mount Everest during an expedition. He has acknowledged inaccurately claiming that he started a Middle East business, expanding it from three to 470 people. And there are doubts about Watkins' self-description as a devoted, sixth-generation Kansan.

Even before Watkins won the crowded primary to succeed retiring GOP Rep. Lynn Jenkins in eastern Kansas' 2nd District, some fellow Republicans were skeptical. One former GOP foe, state Sen. Steve Fitzgerald, called him "a charlatan, a fraud and an opportunist," though he now won't criticize him.

Watkins' campaign website calls him "an accomplished athlete and explorer," citing his 2015 attempt to be the first person to race in the Iditarod and scale Mount Everest in the same year.

In that year's 1,000-mile (1,609-kilometer) dogsled race as a rookie, he finished 58th out of 78. Watkins started the race in March 2018 but didn't finish.

His 2015 expedition on the world's tallest mountain was cut short by an earthquake in Nepal that killed nearly 8,900 people. Watkins' website previously quoted Everest outfitter Guy Cotter as saying he relied on Watkins' "heroic leadership amid the chaos." Watkins said it was in response to his calm and the moral support he offered his group of stranded climbers.

Cotter told The Associated Press that he never said it and was unaware Watkins had put the quote on his campaign website. It was removed after the AP questioned Watkins about Cotter's comments.

"There was not really anything heroic to be able to do," Cotter said in a phone interview from New Zealand. "We all felt quite hopeless ... because we were not there, where all the injured and dying people were, through that event. We were actually up on the mountain, so there was very little we could contribute."

Watkins said: "I captured the statement, to the best of my memory. He and I spoke frequently and often when we were up there, and he shared the sentiment."

As for the Iditarod, four-time winner Jeff King saw Watkins' entry this year as a stunt for his political campaign and Watkins' self-portrayal as an adventurer as a "gigantic fallacy."

Musher Tara Cicatello was at the back of the pack with Watkins, and both were forced to quit 11 days into the contest because they were so far behind. She said Watkins' chief concern after being forced to withdraw was the publicity he had lined up. He was on the phone talking about speaking engagements and left the dogs that had carried him more than 700 miles in the care of people who were already overwhelmed with other dogs, she said.

"People were irritated with Steve because they were doing more work for his dogs than he was," Cicatello said. "I don't think he mistreated them. It just sounds like he was all about his campaign and the show of it than the actual doing of it."

Watkins said he entered the 2018 dogsled race because he believed it could be his last chance to compete.

Recently the Kansas City Star reported that while Watkins claimed to have started a company and built it from scratch, in fact he joined an existing company as a contractor. To explain the discrepancy, Watkins said he helped create products and services for the company's clients.

And public records show the 42-year-old Army veteran hadn't lived in Kansas since he left high school — nearly two decades before returning to the state last year to run for Congress. During the AP interview, he acknowledged a "transient" life.

"It was exciting, and it was dangerous, challenging and meaningful," he said.

Military records show Watkins spent five years on active duty with the Army, including six months in Afghanistan. His work as a contractor began late in 2004.

He said his priorities shifted after being injured as a contractor in Afghanistan in 2013. In a 2015 Washington Post interview, he described it as a traumatic brain injury and also said he'd been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder nearly a decade earlier. He told AP the 2013 injury was a "tipping point" that pushed him toward "a more conventional life" but would not discuss details.

Watkins said Kansas "was always home in my heart." However, he applied 11 times between 2002 and 2015 for the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend, a payment to those who have lived in the state for a full year and say they intend to remain indefinitely.

Property records show Watkins owns two condos in Alaska, purchased in 2005 and 2015, while the Topeka residence on his voter registration is rented.

Days before Watkins won the seven-candidate August primary, 40 local Republican leaders signed an open letter expressing concerns including his absence from the district. Some GOP leaders also were wary of him after three Democrats said publicly that he met with them last year about running as a Democrat — something he strongly disputes.

Many GOP doubters have since endorsed him because the stakes for the party are high. Even though President Donald Trump won the district by nearly 17 percentage points in 2016, Democrats see the seat as a prime opportunity. Watkins' better-known Democratic opponent, attorney and former Kansas House minority leader Paul Davis, carried the district when he narrowly lost the 2014 governor's race.

Davis has his own baggage after representing a legislative district in the liberal-for-Kansas city of Lawrence. Republicans have revived a 1998 incident in which Davis, then a 26-year-old attorney, was present during a drug raid at a strip club while visiting its owner, a client. Police did not accuse him of wrongdoing.

But in nominating Watkins, the GOP took a risk because he's not been active politically until now, said Bob Beatty, a Washburn University of Topeka political scientist.

"The party does not know what he was doing in Alaska and in the other places he lived," Beatty said. "It may be a good leap of faith, but it's still a leap of faith."

6a6fd124-c670-11e8-a27d-25eda8586eb5



Really....

That's all you've got to counter the Democratic Destruction
of a VERY GOOD MAN'S character, you really should " Educate "
yourself on the LIES Sen Richard Blumenthal has told and many
other DEMOCRATIC Senators....

Let's start with STOLEN VALOR .....
He should NOT be a Senator...
He should NOT be holding ANY public Office....
He should STEP down immediately .....

And YOU my little PUSSY MAN should read more of the TRUTH instead of
Union Weekly Garbage.....
 
DoT1KEKXkAAQ4P0.jpg
 




This Scandal is blowing up by the minute !!!!

She's in deep shit about now !

I truly feel sorry for the #itch......NOT !

Wait til the Creepy Porn Star Lawyer gets hooked up in the net..
He tries to act " Tough " , but I'll bet a Dollar to a Doughnut when he
gets caught he sings like a canary and pisses his " Pussy Man " pants .....

Guys lie him are cardboard " Tough Guys "....I've seen them over and over and over...
Mark my words.....
 
Desperation.
Here and there.


What did I say about him....Today he just got linked to Sen Chris Coons and another
lady who is Dr Christine Blasey - Fords life long friend who.....wait for it !

Worked in the FBI for 22 years and her ex boyfriend swore under oath about Dr Ford
coaching her on how to take a Lie Detector test.

And yes at the last minute today " Creepy Porn Star Lawyer " rolled out another hog that
slopped at the trough of lies provided by Democrats...

This FBI connection is damn deep and literally treasonous !!!!

Creepy Porn Star Lawyer has some very very deep involvement with ALL of this, the average
jackass like him would have " disappeared " by now....

And who is Sen Chris Coons leading around by the nose .....Sen Jeff Flake...

What's in Flakes " Wallet/Closet ".....!!!!!
 
What did I say about him....Today he just got linked to Sen Chris Coons and another
lady who is Dr Christine Blasey - Fords life long friend who.....wait for it !

Worked in the FBI for 22 years and her ex boyfriend swore under oath about Dr Ford
coaching her on how to take a Lie Detector test.

And yes at the last minute today " Creepy Porn Star Lawyer " rolled out another hog that
slopped at the trough of lies provided by Democrats...

This FBI connection is damn deep and literally treasonous !!!!

Creepy Porn Star Lawyer has some very very deep involvement with ALL of this, the average
jackass like him would have " disappeared " by now....

And who is Sen Chris Coons leading around by the nose .....Sen Jeff Flake...

What's in Flakes " Wallet/Closet ".....!!!!!
They have pictures of flake.
 
Looking in here is like looking into to the mind of a self-tortured middle schooler, a loner who was voted most likely to go postal . . . "CUZ I'LL SHOW YOU ALL!". . . once again, hilarious.
 
Back
Top