Ponderable

Sheriff Joe said:
Are you kidding me? What does Mexican have to do with anything?
Click to expand...

You have already bragged about being a liar who just posts on here to piss people off, and now, by the way you are trying to evade your racist behavior, you are a coward as well.

Liar, racist, coward - nice CV you got there. I would think that anyone who is related to a Mexican, or married to a Mexican, and therefore has what your ilk considers to be inferior people as relatives and children, would speak up and denounce you, but maybe they are afraid of your response so they are just cowards as well.
 
espola said:
You have already bragged about being a liar who just posts on here to piss people off, and now, by the way you are trying to evade your racist behavior, you are a coward as well.

Liar, racist, coward - nice CV you got there. I would think that anyone who is related to a Mexican, or married to a Mexican, and therefore has what your ilk considers to be inferior people as relatives and children, would speak up and denounce you, but maybe they are afraid of your response so they are just cowards as well.
Click to expand...
#1 You know what they say if you can't take a joke.
#2 You are the biggest liar on this forum.
#3 Get over your self, Snowflake.
 
A Nap After Lunch Makes You Smarter

Afternoon naps are no longer guilty pleasures. New research finds that a postlunch snooze, if it’s not too long, is very good for the brain…especially if you’re older. Smart napping might even keep your mind younger.

Background: In Spain, China and many other countries, an afternoon nap after lunch is a time-honored cultural tradition, especially for older people. While it’s known that short “power naps” of 10 minutes or so can improve alertness and accuracy when performing mental tasks, the jury has been out on the cognitive effects of these longer siesta-type naps.

Study: American researchers studied 3,000 Chinese adults age 65 and older. They were asked to recall their postlunch napping (if any) over the previous month and were then classified as nonnappers, short nappers (less than 30 minutes) moderate nappers (30 to 90 minutes) and long nappers (more than 90 minutes). They were all given cognitive tests that included basic math, memory exercises and copying drawings.

Results: While 60% of the subjects regularly took postlunch naps, not all had cognitive benefits. The sweet spot for optimal performance on brain function tests was a moderate nap of more than 30 but less than 90 minutes. They did better on the cognitive tests than nonnappers, shorter nappers and longer nappers. Second best were the shorter nappers, who had better cognitive test scores than either nonnappers or long nappers.

Surprising finding: Compared with nonnappers/long nappers, the moderate nappers performed on cognitive tests like people who were five years younger.

Bottom line: If you can swing it, take a 30-to-90–minute snooze after lunch—your brain will thank you! The researchers cite other studies to explain what happens. You may wake up feeling a little groggy—it’s called “sleep inertia”—but once you fully wake up, your cognitive functioning will be improved for the next 24 hours.

Bonus: Afternoon naps can reduce blood pressure and even are linked to a lower risk for heart attacks and stroke, other studies have found.

http://bottomlineinc.com/health/memory/nap-lunch-makes-smarter

Apparently we have no nap takers around here.....:cool:
 
Ha ha.
Someone needs a nap.

If you guys don't think you're racist, I'm gonna go get my mom, or my wife to tell you how racist you are!

Please... take a fucking nap already.
 
I'ole's ignore button on campus too

https://fee.org/articles/why-free-speech-on-campus-is-under-attack-blame-marcuse/?utm_source=ribbon

It’s become routine. An outside lecturer like Charles Murray or FEE’s own Lawrence Reed is invited to lecture on campus, just to give a different perspective than students might be hearing in the classroom. It seems like the way academia is supposed to work: many ideas are presented as a contribution to a rich education and the student is given the tools to make up his or her own mind.

But instead of a fair hearing, the invited lecturer is met with protests and gets shouted down. Aggressive and belligerent students accuse the speaker of every manner of evil. It’s not even about providing an intellectual challenge. No one minds that. The protesters want to stop the speaker from saying anything. They intimidate, threaten, scream, shout, and drive the guest from campus. The victors claim that the campus has been made safe again.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
I'ole's ignore button on campus too

https://fee.org/articles/why-free-speech-on-campus-is-under-attack-blame-marcuse/?utm_source=ribbon

It’s become routine. An outside lecturer like Charles Murray or FEE’s own Lawrence Reed is invited to lecture on campus, just to give a different perspective than students might be hearing in the classroom. It seems like the way academia is supposed to work: many ideas are presented as a contribution to a rich education and the student is given the tools to make up his or her own mind.

But instead of a fair hearing, the invited lecturer is met with protests and gets shouted down. Aggressive and belligerent students accuse the speaker of every manner of evil. It’s not even about providing an intellectual challenge. No one minds that. The protesters want to stop the speaker from saying anything. They intimidate, threaten, scream, shout, and drive the guest from campus. The victors claim that the campus has been made safe again.
Click to expand...
Shocker! To the snowflakes.
 
The Best Poster I’ve Ever Seen on Gun Control, Without Rival
April 19, 2010 by Dan Mitchell

This image really captures the essence of the issue. Share this with your statist friends and maybe they’ll begin to understand.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top