OMG

WATCH: Transgender Speaking Against Teaching Kids Gender Identity Triggers Alleged Antifa Member To Go Crazy
gettyimages-964501030.jpg

Photo by GeorgePeters/GettyImages


dw_og_default.png

By HANK BERRIEN
June 25, 2019
36.9k views


During a speech at the University of British Columbia by Jenn Smith, who is transgender but opposes teaching children about sexual orientation and gender identity, an alleged member of Antifa went crazy, rushing out, striking an innocent bystander and ending up being detained by police while screaming hysterically.


Daily Wire TV

Loaded: 99.65%


Duration 0:37
Man Arrested After Camera He Allegedly Stole Kept Streaming


Smith was speaking on “how transgender politics in school and society is undermining our freedom and harming women and children” as protesters were outside. A fire alarm sounded, and as it rang out the Antifa member bolted out of her seat and up the stairs. Smith said of the alleged Antifa member, “I think the original intent was to go after me but she got spooked by RCMP near me and instead charged out of the building and flailed at the man at the back. This is a pattern of harassment. When I did my Vancouver Island tour I had a group of apparently professional protesters following me from town to town causing disruptions.”

Prior to the event, Smith had written:


After five different venues canceled my scheduled talks recently due to slander and harassment from dishonest LGBTQ protesters and activists such as Morgane Oger, my presentation at UBC Sunday night (June 23, at 6:45pm until 8:45pm) will go ahead. Despite UBC raising the security costs on my event from $500 to $1400 including taxes (bringing our overall costs for the venue and other expenses to over $3000), I was able, in conjunction with the Canadian Christian Lobby and generous supporters, to raise enough money (with pledges) to pay for most of the additional security costs. We are very grateful to everybody who stepped up to help make sure this event happens, and very discouraged by those trying to silence free speech.

I would like to note that I regard the increased security fees as very unfair and unjust. I have given talks all over BC and I have never caused problems or damage to property. It is only the protesters who come out and behave badly in order to get my talks shut down that are the problem. These protesters are using (literally) the same opposition silencing tactics that were used by the brown shirt storm troopers in pre-Nazi Germany. This should alarm everybody.

Before Smith‘s event at UBC, the Association of Administrative Professional Staff at UBC (AAPS) wrote to UBC president Santa Ono decrying the university’s permission for Smith to speak. AAPS executive director Joey Hansen stated that the members were worried about “the University’s decision to serve as a platform for bigoted, anti-transgender hate speech.”

Smith’s events at Douglas College in New Westminster and Trinity Western University in Langley were both canceled after the schools found out about the nature of the events. The Douglas College event was scheduled for June 8. After it was canceled, Smith wrote, “What we are seeing today is a complete collapse of freedom of speech, while the institutions traditionally tasked with protecting free speech completely abrogate their responsibilities. The media and our institutions of higher learning are now complicit in what is essentially a quasi-fascistic attempt to silence all dissenting views on a subject that involves not only women’s rights, the well-being of our most vulnerable children, but freedom itself, hence the title of my talk.”

Last night protesters tried to shut down an event at @UBC feat. a trans speaker critical of trans ideology. Students & some faculty had demanded event be cancelled. One masked woman was detained & began screaming & crying on camera. #antifapic.twitter.com/NqimiY6n2t
 
Two Moms Expose Drag Queen Story Hour Featuring Stripping Drag Queen, are Forced Out by Police

Posted at 9:30 pm on June 25, 2019 by Brandon Morse


Capture-6-620x481.png


Drag Queen Story Hour has become a point of contention between the public and the LGBT activist community, but we’re always told that it’s nothing we need to worry about.





Two moms proved that this isn’t the case.

According to College Fix, two mothers attended the Drag Queen Story Hour and what they witnessed wasn’t at all suitable for children. This includes a drag queen doing something of a strip show to a song that ended with profanity:

The women and some of their allies attending the event in a somewhat undercover capacity were able to capture on film a large amount of the pride festivities at the Renton Public Library — including the graphic performance of a drag queen — before police were called to escort some of the moms out.

In the performance, the drag queen was seen removing a skirt at the start and then dancing in scantily clad clothing to the tune of the song “Like a Girl.” The drag queen sang in part, “If you feel like a girl, then you real like a girl. Do your thing, run the whole damn world.” The song ended with various expletives.

The drag queen’s dance was captured on video.


“I witnessed kids in that show and in the following panel that couldn’t have been more than ten,” one of the moms told The Fix.





Also being handed out at the show, which featured kids ranging from their teens to kids in strollers, were flavored condoms, dental dams, sex pamphlets that depicted a penis, and more.
 
JUNE 26, 2019
Making LGBT a Protected Class Will Kill Religious Liberty
By T.R. Clancy
The current campaign to amend federal and state civil rights laws to extend protections to sexual orientation and gender identity isn't meant to eliminate discrimination — it's meant to eliminate religious freedom.

What else are we to believe when proponents of such amendments tell us as much?

Earlier this month, Michigan State Senator Jeremy Moss introduced legislation to amend the state's civil rights law to add sexual orientation and sexual identity as protected classes. One of the main objections to changing the law before now has been the harm it must do to conscience protections and the free exercise of religion. Like their federal cousin, the Equality Act, these laws can't ensure equality because, as gay writer Brad Polumbo explains, they work by "elevating [LGBT] rights over those of religious Americans."

Senator Moss isn't even pretending this isn't the case. As reported in the Oakland Press, Moss said:

[T]he legislation will not make exceptions for those whose religious beliefs condemn homosexuality and other lifestyles[.] ... That would mean, for example, that a Catholic school that teaches against homosexuality could not discriminate against a homosexual job applicant on the basis of sexual orientation.

Bakery owners and photographers could not refuse to serve a same-sex couple's wedding on the basis of their religious beliefs.

None of this bothers Moss, who "says he is gay as well as a practicing Jew," and doesn't see what the problem is. He "knows plenty of rabbis and other religious leaders who support the legislation." Besides, believers who don't see it his way just don't understand the Bible, or their own faith: "A few passages in the Old Testament (teaching against homosexuality) don't give people the right to discriminate. I don't believe there is a conflict between religious values and treating everyone fairly."

And if it turns out there is a conflict between Moss's ideas about "treating everyone fairly" and someone's religious values, then we'll just ignore the religious values. As David Harsanyi recently noted at The Federalist, "compelling the right kind of speech no longer seems a bothersome prospect to most progressives. Any neutral principles that are inherent in the First Amendment have long been discarded for more pressing matters of social justice." How else could Moss write a law that forces a Catholic school principal to hire a homosexual teacher whose lifestyle contradicts Catholic teaching, and forces a Christian baker to design a cake with a message the baker considers sinful?
 
"They're"?
It’s called a conjunction. Short for “they are.” Is that what you mean, or are you suggesting I’m homophobic by referring to the gay community as “they’re” on fire during this Pride Month?

I have noticed that your kind has odd responses to customary words. I’ve gotten weird feedback from “fairly,” “allegedly” and now “they’re.” You people prefer your own frat boy words, like “cuck” and “Proud Boys” and “fashy.”
 
Is it the gays waving the flags?
Also, it’s “Pride Week” or month or some such, so they’re on fire right now.


Who cares.......it's just " Trendy "...

The Romans " Fiddled " with it, look where that got them.

Reproduction comes down to a Man & Woman.
 
If you don't know the difference between "wave" and "waive", you're a clueless moron.

Come on Spoooola..
You " waived " your right to bitch long ago....
You " clueless " lying thief....
Just " wave " goodbye and head out the do....
No one wants to read your moronic grief......
 
You do know that little ploy of yours is completely obvious, right? Probably not though.

I'm not sure I understand it. I could figure out once that he (and others of his friends) would brag about posting something offensive enough to get a response, but it justs seems to be an auto-response now.
 
Back
Top