Do your GKs play other sports?

I was fortunate enough to hear Brad Friedel speak at the NSCAA convention last year. He spoke at length about diversity adding he had scholarship offers in 3 sports. Diversity also includes 1,000 other non athletic activities that lead to a well rounded person. We encourage a well rounded approach.
 
I was fortunate enough to hear Brad Friedel speak at the NSCAA convention last year. He spoke at length about diversity adding he had scholarship offers in 3 sports. Diversity also includes 1,000 other non athletic activities that lead to a well rounded person. We encourage a well rounded approach.
Friedel also grew up in Ohio in the 1980s. Because of the climate and the underdevelopment of club (what we called "travel" season) soccer, there wasn't year-round soccer even if you wanted it. You could play indoor soccer with boards during the winter, but not many places were set up for that so most kids had plenty of time at least for winter sports. Plus, most sports didn't have club or travel, so you could easily play soccer, basketball, baseball with your school teams and never have to travel anywhere for practices. Soccer in Ohio was early to the travel ball concept precisely because many schools didn't even offer soccer.
 
Friedel also grew up in Ohio in the 1980s. Because of the climate and the underdevelopment of club (what we called "travel" season) soccer, there wasn't year-round soccer even if you wanted it. You could play indoor soccer with boards during the winter, but not many places were set up for that so most kids had plenty of time at least for winter sports. Plus, most sports didn't have club or travel, so you could easily play soccer, basketball, baseball with your school teams and never have to travel anywhere for practices. Soccer in Ohio was early to the travel ball concept precisely because many schools didn't even offer soccer.
My apologies Dargle but I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.
 
My apologies Dargle but I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.
Friedel grew up in a time and place where everyone played multiple sports and activities. It wasn't an active choice. It simply wasn't possible to do one activity year-round in most sports. So, while he is surely right that it is great to be well-rounded and it certainly helped him in a variety of ways, his example of getting scholarship offers in three sports is much rarer today even for kids who play multiple sports. Moreover, it's also not what differentiated him from other goalkeepers who succeeded in his era (not all were as successful as he was, of course, in those other sports, but many played other sports).
 
Friedel grew up in a time and place where everyone played multiple sports and activities. It wasn't an active choice. It simply wasn't possible to do one activity year-round in most sports. So, while he is surely right that it is great to be well-rounded and it certainly helped him in a variety of ways, his example of getting scholarship offers in three sports is much rarer today even for kids who play multiple sports. Moreover, it's also not what differentiated him from other goalkeepers who succeeded in his era (not all were as successful as he was, of course, in those other sports, but many played other sports).
So are you suggesting that today’s players cannot be active and successful at a high level in multiple sports/activities?
 
So are you suggesting that today’s players cannot be active and successful at a high level in multiple sports/activities?
I was suggesting he was comparing his time/place/era with ours and that's really only plausible if you're saying that GKs then were better than they are today (which I'm not sure he was saying, although you reported the comment so perhaps you have more context). Today, if you did enough to get scholarships in two non-soccer sports, the chances you would be able to play at a sufficiently high level club/DA etc to also get a scholarship in soccer are not great. Not impossible, particularly in girls where there are more scholarships available and more sports opening up, but difficult. Certainly moreso in SoCal where soccer overlaps with a lot of other sports' seasons. Now, perhaps that's all Friedel meant - that we've gone crazy with year-round training in every sport and everyone would be better off if we backed off a bit. Which was my point. There's a major structural/systemic difference from where and when he played and today.
 
I was suggesting he was comparing his time/place/era with ours and that's really only plausible if you're saying that GKs then were better than they are today (which I'm not sure he was saying, although you reported the comment so perhaps you have more context). Today, if you did enough to get scholarships in two non-soccer sports, the chances you would be able to play at a sufficiently high level club/DA etc to also get a scholarship in soccer are not great. Not impossible, particularly in girls where there are more scholarships available and more sports opening up, but difficult. Certainly moreso in SoCal where soccer overlaps with a lot of other sports' seasons. Now, perhaps that's all Friedel meant - that we've gone crazy with year-round training in every sport and everyone would be better off if we backed off a bit. Which was my point. There's a major structural/systemic difference from where and when he played and today.
I should add that I do know players who have been successful in multiple activities and sports. We probably could all cite examples (although perhaps not players with offers for D1 scholarships in three different sports). For example, I know a GK who is also an accomplished pianist. He's going to have to make a choice about his priorities soon because piano competitions are national/international and he'll need to be on a team with at least one other GK and possibly two others because it's common to have one injured, but that's fine. He's certainly a great kid and is better off for life having done both. The benefit of piano, though, is he the schedule outside of competition can fit nicely with soccer. Not as easy anymore with AAU basketball, travel baseball, club volleyball, serious gymnastics etc.
 
The other thing about goalkeeping is that for the longest time, people said it's better not to jump into goalkeeping too early. The NSCAA for example recommends that kids don't begin to specialize until age 12. But given how the game has evolved, and that kids as young as 8 are playing club ball, that's a little difficult to manage. It would require not playing soccer with goalkeepers until a later age (which always causes rebellions when it is suggested...the push back to the 4 v 4 no keepers was really severe when it was first rolled out..."it's not really soccer") or US Soccer mandating rotations in the position and expressly telling coaches that goalkeepers should not be allowed to do certain things that without specialization might lead to injuries (diving, one v ones, kstops, coming out for the cross). Right now, you have the situation that kids that are shunted into goal without the proper training are essentially sacrificial lambs, risking injury, bearing blame for potential losses since they don't have the skill to stop certain plays, and losing out on touches in the field (particularly if they are good in the goalkeeping role and the coach is win oriented). But if you are going to train them, it's really almost a sport entirely different with a different set of skills and you aren't going to get good at it unless either you are a natural or you start really early. And with kids starting to get their intense field training even earlier, waiting until age 12 puts keepers (who don't naturally get a lot of touches on ball anyway) at a huge development disadvantage (no wonder keepers peak so late into their prime!). The one thing that the US did very well was develop goalkeepers well....I'm not so sure that's going to be the case in the near future.
 
The other thing about goalkeeping is that for the longest time, people said it's better not to jump into goalkeeping too early. The NSCAA for example recommends that kids don't begin to specialize until age 12. But given how the game has evolved, and that kids as young as 8 are playing club ball, that's a little difficult to manage. It would require not playing soccer with goalkeepers until a later age (which always causes rebellions when it is suggested...the push back to the 4 v 4 no keepers was really severe when it was first rolled out..."it's not really soccer") or US Soccer mandating rotations in the position and expressly telling coaches that goalkeepers should not be allowed to do certain things that without specialization might lead to injuries (diving, one v ones, kstops, coming out for the cross). Right now, you have the situation that kids that are shunted into goal without the proper training are essentially sacrificial lambs, risking injury, bearing blame for potential losses since they don't have the skill to stop certain plays, and losing out on touches in the field (particularly if they are good in the goalkeeping role and the coach is win oriented). But if you are going to train them, it's really almost a sport entirely different with a different set of skills and you aren't going to get good at it unless either you are a natural or you start really early. And with kids starting to get their intense field training even earlier, waiting until age 12 puts keepers (who don't naturally get a lot of touches on ball anyway) at a huge development disadvantage (no wonder keepers peak so late into their prime!). The one thing that the US did very well was develop goalkeepers well....I'm not so sure that's going to be the case in the near future.
 
Interesting point. And yes, specializing is not recommended til they are older, but so often when you have the only kid willing to play in the goal and they like it, they \get boxed into the position at an early age. Our DD loved playing goal, but by age 10.5, even though she was supposed to be given field opportunities, she never got them because, " No one else will let their kids play in the position." Playing outside sports - basketball, swimming, lacrosse, a track team at school - gave her what she missed playing on the field. She even played a season of AYSO three years up and only played the field. At this stage, she has decided to give up the other sports and only focus on soccer and goalkeeping. She is going into 9th grade, and loves playing GK. I don't know if she would be here tho, if not for the exposure to other sports that gave her other skills and some choices.
 
Curious how many of your GKs play other sports. We have always played other sports and it has had a very positive effect, and been supported by the GK coach. Soccer is the only club sport we play, so it is front and center. Getting older certainly makes it hard to fit it other sports, but curious as to how many GKs are playing more than soccer.
My Keeper Kid plays Rec. Basketball and it seems to coordinate well with his goalkeeper stuff.
 
I was suggesting he was comparing his time/place/era with ours and that's really only plausible if you're saying that GKs then were better than they are today (which I'm not sure he was saying, although you reported the comment so perhaps you have more context). Today, if you did enough to get scholarships in two non-soccer sports, the chances you would be able to play at a sufficiently high level club/DA etc to also get a scholarship in soccer are not great. Not impossible, particularly in girls where there are more scholarships available and more sports opening up, but difficult. Certainly moreso in SoCal where soccer overlaps with a lot of other sports' seasons. Now, perhaps that's all Friedel meant - that we've gone crazy with year-round training in every sport and everyone would be better off if we backed off a bit. Which was my point. There's a major structural/systemic difference from where and when he played and today.
My apologies for not responding sooner. I hear every word you have said Dargle, and you do make some good points. I'd like to take a step back and look at the subject of this thread which is "Do your GKs play other sports?" My reason for bringing up Brad Friedel's comments was even someone who played at the highest level appreciates the value of diversity in our kids. Comparing eras and crazy ear-round training isn't the point. The point is what are we doing with our kids and specifically to this post, to our GKs in relation to other sports. I tell all my parents that 99.99999% of the kids I coach will go pro in something other than soccer, but 100% of the kids I coach will grow up and will need to be well rounded. Sidelines are littered with kids and adults that for one reason or another did not turn pro. To insinuate that it is the era, or year round training that is forcing parents into that decision in my opinion is wrong. I have a 6'5" Junior who is an amazing keeper, he is also working on his eagle scout, he is a junior life guard, plays in his HS band and is in the national honors society. In my personal opinion he is a better keeper because of his diversity and not 100% focused on goal keeping only. I also have 9 and 10 year olds who don't want to do anything else but play keeper and that is OK too, but if they want to do other things as they get older regardless of how good of a keeper they become, I will encourage the diversity. Just my two cents. :)
 
My apologies for not responding sooner. I hear every word you have said Dargle, and you do make some good points. I'd like to take a step back and look at the subject of this thread which is "Do your GKs play other sports?" My reason for bringing up Brad Friedel's comments was even someone who played at the highest level appreciates the value of diversity in our kids. Comparing eras and crazy ear-round training isn't the point. The point is what are we doing with our kids and specifically to this post, to our GKs in relation to other sports. I tell all my parents that 99.99999% of the kids I coach will go pro in something other than soccer, but 100% of the kids I coach will grow up and will need to be well rounded. Sidelines are littered with kids and adults that for one reason or another did not turn pro. To insinuate that it is the era, or year round training that is forcing parents into that decision in my opinion is wrong. I have a 6'5" Junior who is an amazing keeper, he is also working on his eagle scout, he is a junior life guard, plays in his HS band and is in the national honors society. In my personal opinion he is a better keeper because of his diversity and not 100% focused on goal keeping only. I also have 9 and 10 year olds who don't want to do anything else but play keeper and that is OK too, but if they want to do other things as they get older regardless of how good of a keeper they become, I will encourage the diversity. Just my two cents. :)

In some cases, like my son's, US Soccer is the one who preventing him playing other sports.
 
My daughter plays basketball (with her soccer girls, they formed an awesome rec team) and used to swim competitively. I know she would love to be back in the pool, but the schedules conflict terribly.
 
My apologies for not responding sooner. I hear every word you have said Dargle, and you do make some good points. I'd like to take a step back and look at the subject of this thread which is "Do your GKs play other sports?" My reason for bringing up Brad Friedel's comments was even someone who played at the highest level appreciates the value of diversity in our kids. Comparing eras and crazy ear-round training isn't the point. The point is what are we doing with our kids and specifically to this post, to our GKs in relation to other sports. I tell all my parents that 99.99999% of the kids I coach will go pro in something other than soccer, but 100% of the kids I coach will grow up and will need to be well rounded. Sidelines are littered with kids and adults that for one reason or another did not turn pro. To insinuate that it is the era, or year round training that is forcing parents into that decision in my opinion is wrong. I have a 6'5" Junior who is an amazing keeper, he is also working on his eagle scout, he is a junior life guard, plays in his HS band and is in the national honors society. In my personal opinion he is a better keeper because of his diversity and not 100% focused on goal keeping only. I also have 9 and 10 year olds who don't want to do anything else but play keeper and that is OK too, but if they want to do other things as they get older regardless of how good of a keeper they become, I will encourage the diversity. Just my two cents. :)
I guess I would put getting good grades (e.g., NHS) and doing other things (Friedel's non-athletic activities point) and playing other sports (Friedel's comment about getting scholarship offers in three sports) in different categories. I was generally responding to the latter. I don't know anyone who is against the former, although year-round sports can interfere even if you do multiple sports. This thread has mostly been focused on the latter point.
 
In some cases, like my son's, US Soccer is the one who preventing him playing other sports.
Understood Eagle33 but isn't that a family decision? I'm assuming your keeper is having an amazing experience and you are all comfortable with the decision vs. feeling like something is missing.
 
Understood Eagle33 but isn't that a family decision? I'm assuming your keeper is having an amazing experience and you are all comfortable with the decision vs. feeling like something is missing.

I don't think taking an option to play HS sports away from kids is a good idea.
 
Back
Top