Aside from the bias in your statement, there is a massive hole in your logic. The DA was only just a LEAGUE. The people running the DA were the clubs. US Soccer simply subsidized a league for these DA club teams to play. The subsidized league paid for referees and had some tournaments/playoffs. The clubs participating the DA League had some excellent results and identifying kids for the next level of development, but we had two problems:
- There was (and remains) no "next level" of professional development in the US on par with our European and Latin American friends for that critical stage of 17-22.
- Only a lucky few with dual citizenship could escape the US young adult development (18-22) disaster and sign with real professional academies (Pulisc, Sargent, Reyna, etc.)
To hold US Soccer accountable "for result" when the youth clubs and MLS had 100% controllof development is silly and illogical. To hold US Soccer accountable for the fact that the MLS and USL are inept at player development is likewise silly. There isn't a single MLS team that could compete at the Premiere League level or Bundalisga or Liga 1 or just about any other Division 1 league.
This is not and never has been US Soccer's cross to bear, it is the 110% on the MLS and USL.
... well maybe US Soccer is to blame in 1 area, which is its lack of embracing RSTP (training and solidarity fees). This failure set us back at least a decade or more. Fortunately, the MLS pulled its head out of its ass and is now demanding RSTP payments for the loss of its youth academy players.