I literally laughed out loud.
Thank you, kind sir!
I literally laughed out loud.
Been awhile.When did the Navy last build a fossil-fuel powered carrier?
Been awhile.
Makes sense too. They can carry alot more jet fuel that way.
You're closing in on 4nos level.
Thanks, spola.You're closing in on 4nos level.
Don't get the joke?Didn't read the link?
First one must have a sense of humor, understand irony and have an at least an average IQ to understand Ramirez...Humor needs to be based in some relative reality to be funny. The stretch in logic to deem the above humorous is the only thing that is laughable.
Low brow and juvenile at best.First one must have a sense of humor, understand irony and have an at least an average IQ to understand Ramirez...
One more thing...climb down off that high horse.
Low brow and juvenile at best.
Nice elitist retort!Low brow and juvenile at best.
Nice elitist retort!
You still wont get invited to the holiday gala.
You people are the best advocates for us people.He knows his audience.
Yes he does.He knows his audience.
Mostly the guy from high school who would hang out in the 7/11 parking lot and scream "HELL YEAH!" a lot.He knows his audience.
Kapalama Hts. isnʻt zoned for 7/11's. All residentīal.Mostly the guy from high school who would hang out in the 7/11 parking lot and scream "HELL YEAH!" a lot.
I saw Scientifica Principia International graced out little climate thread. In the climate blah-blah-blah go sphere even skeptics like Watts, no friend of the scientific consensus, think they are full of it. There is a long standing antagonism between WUWT and SPI. A couple of years ago there was this true classic in the blahgosphere with the lightbulb in the mirror "experiments". At stake-do we quibble with the magnitude (or anthropogenic influence) of the climate sensitivity constant of Arrhenius's greenhouse gas law, or, as SPI would have you believe, is the whole law itself complete bullshit. Poppycock I guess since SPI has big Brit influence in their little "scientific community". Here's what Watts has to say about them, which I guess about sums it up.
"Most of what that group does is to spin sciencey sounding theories and pal reviewed papers by a mysterious members-only peer review system, and I have yet to any one of them try to do anything at an experimental/empirical measurement level to back up the sort of claims they make."
If anybody wants to check out the lightbulb thing you can get a sense of it from these links. Fair warning-its kind of like watching an episode of Mythbusters where they never quite get around to blowing something up. But you will get to see a digital thermocouple in action and you may discover that everything you know is wrong.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/27/new-wuwt-tv-segment-slaying-the-slayers-with-watts/
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/28/slaying-the-slayers-with-watts-part-2/
http://principia-scientific.org/light-bulb-experiments-slaying-watts-with-watts/
That sums up your sense of humor nicely.Low brow and juvenile at best.
While youre at it, unscrew the light bulb, put your thumb in the hole, and try sticking your foot in the bathtub.They get partial credit for spelling thermodynamics correctly.
One thing I would try with the light bulb and mirror setup - with the IR thermometer, measure several spots on the light bulb and then measure similar spots in the reflection of the light bulb in the mirror.
While youre at it, unscrew the light bulb, put your thumb in the hole, and try sticking your foot in the bathtub.
(first fill tub with water)