So nothing yet again, just another case of you spouting your mouth off about absolutely nothing, hence the name nono. No content, no sense, no accountability, no reality.
Hey....I like that !
I'll use it on you.
Thanks !
So nothing yet again, just another case of you spouting your mouth off about absolutely nothing, hence the name nono. No content, no sense, no accountability, no reality.
Of course you will you have no imagination beyond the voices in your head and "I know you are but what am I" is a staple amongst the SoCal Opinion Forum nutter brigade.Hey....I like that !
I'll use it on you.
Thanks !
Of course you will you have no imagination beyond the voices in your head and "I know you are but what am I" is a staple amongst the SoCal Opinion Forum nutter brigade.
Do you ever go back and read your own post? Too funny. So glad you play for the other team.Of course you will you have no imagination beyond the voices in your head and "I know you are but what am I" is a staple amongst the SoCal Opinion Forum nutter brigade.
Do you ever go back and read your own post? Too funny. So glad you play for the other team.
You always give up the goat.Are you saying that you are proud of your membership on the 4nos team?
Is that Aff-ism or did you actually mean to write, "ghost"?You always give up the goat.
Its a metaphor for letting the cat out of the bag.Is that Aff-ism or did you actually mean to write, "ghost"?
Aff it is then.Its a metaphor for letting the cat out of the bag.
You always give up the goat.
Its a metaphor for letting the cat out of the bag.
Did you just make that up?
He's just metaphorically challenged...
New York Times?In a quest to shrink national monuments last year, senior Interior Department officials dismissed evidence that these public sites boosted tourism and spurred archaeological discoveries, according to documents the department released this month and retracted a day later.
The thousands of pages of email correspondence chart how Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and his aides instead tailored their survey of protected sites to emphasize the value of logging, ranching and energy development that would be unlocked if they were not designated national monuments.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...1bf7847b375_story.html?utm_term=.2d5b405dba6a
WASHINGTON — Even before President Trump officially opened his high-profile review last spring of federal lands protected as national monuments, the Department of Interior was focused on the potential for oil and gas exploration at a protected Utah site, internal agency documents show.
The debate started as early as March 2017, when an aide to Senator Orrin Hatch, Republican of Utah, asked a senior Interior Department official to consider shrinking Bears Ears National Monument in the southeastern corner of the state. Under a longstanding program in Utah, oil and natural gas deposits within the boundaries of the monument could have been used to raise revenue for public schools had the land not been under federal protection.
“Please see attached for a shapefile and pdf of a map depicting a boundary change for the southeast portion of the Bears Ears monument,” said the March 15 email from Senator Hatch’s office. Adopting this map would “resolve all known mineral conflicts,” the email said, referring to oil and gas sites on the land that the state’s public schools wanted to lease out to bolster funds.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/02/climate/bears-ears-national-monument.html
What did they get wrong?New York Times?
Aren't they a Mexican news paper?
Whoever let espola in on the joke was an idiot.Aff it is then.