All things disgusting with and around dump

Ricky Fandango said:
A statist.
One that gives the rights and responsibilities of the individual over to the state.
Someone who views the Constitution is an impediment.
A socialist, leftist, or SJW.
One who accepts state doctrine as morality.
A person who gives up freedom for security.
Someone who is convinced by experts, but too lazy to check.
Layabouts.
The self important excuse makers for envy.

Those people communists use to subvert the greatness of liberty.
Commies.
Click to expand...

Describes right wing nutters in here more then anyone else...
 
Wez said:
Describes right wing nutters in here more then anyone else...
Click to expand...
Poor guys, they’re so angry and they’re embarrassed to say why so they resort to “commie.”

I’ve now asked 3 times if they can name any countries less commie than us and they can’t.

Then I got this other idiot trying to say that Comey, who got fired for launching an investigation of Trump based largely on the findings of a former British intelligence officer who was a world-leading Russian expert, now hiring himself to private sources, doesn’t believe what’s in the dossier.

Wait, there’s more. There’s the guy who cuts-and-pastes from obscure academic polemics to prove his points.

None of them have any idea what’s going on. They just know they’re pissed off and trying to blame something or someone that they can admit to.
 
xav10 said:
Poor guys, they’re so angry and they’re embarrassed to say why so they resort to “commie.”

I’ve now asked 3 times if they can name any countries less commie than us and they can’t.

Then I got this other idiot trying to say that Comey, who got fired for launching an investigation of Trump based largely on the findings of a former British intelligence officer who was a world-leading Russian expert, now hiring himself to private sources, doesn’t believe what’s in the dossier.

Wait, there’s more. There’s the guy who cuts-and-pastes from obscure academic polemics to prove his points.

None of them have any idea what’s going on. They just know they’re pissed off and trying to blame something or someone that they can admit to.
Click to expand...
Yes, tell us all about it, try and be truthful, not your strong point, but give it a go.
 
xav10 said:
Poor guys, they’re so angry and they’re embarrassed to say why so they resort to “commie.”

I’ve now asked 3 times if they can name any countries less commie than us and they can’t.

Then I got this other idiot trying to say that Comey, who got fired for launching an investigation of Trump based largely on the findings of a former British intelligence officer who was a world-leading Russian expert, now hiring himself to private sources, doesn’t believe what’s in the dossier.

Wait, there’s more. There’s the guy who cuts-and-pastes from obscure academic polemics to prove his points.

None of them have any idea what’s going on. They just know they’re pissed off and trying to blame something or someone that they can admit to.
Click to expand...

QE?
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Yes and no. Depends on your committment or lack thereof in understanding and knowledge.
Click to expand...
So you can’t name any.
Here’s what’s great.

1. We are Commies but you people can’t name a country less communist. Or you’re embarrassed to do so.

2. Comey is corrupt.

3. Mueller is corrupt (or a lib).

4. Rosenstein is corrupt (or a lib).

5. Steele was paid, at the obvious risk of his entire career credibility, $168K to destroy his career with a fake dossier.

At some point, don’t you look around and see who really has the problem?

Or maybe you’re where you are for a reason...
 
xav10 said:
So you can’t name any.
Here’s what’s great.

1. We are Commies but you people can’t name a country less communist. Or you’re embarrassed to do so.

2. Comey is corrupt.

3. Mueller is corrupt (or a lib).

4. Rosenstein is corrupt (or a lib).

5. Steele was paid, at the obvious risk of his entire career credibility, $168K to destroy his career with a fake dossier.

At some point, don’t you look around and see who really has the problem?

Or maybe you’re where you are for a reason...
Click to expand...

Come on that would require two things that he wouldn't want to do.

1. Introspection
2. Admitting that he was wrong and voted for a self serving traitor.
 
MakeAPlay said:
Come on that would require two things that he wouldn't want to do.

1. Introspection
2. Admitting that he was wrong and voted for a self serving traitor.
Click to expand...

There is a psychological barrier to admitting one is wrong, especially for those who have been publicly adamant in their errors.

It is interesting to watch the hypocrites squirm.
 
espola said:
There is a psychological barrier to admitting one is wrong, especially for those who have been publicly adamant in their errors.

It is interesting to watch the hypocrites squirm.
Click to expand...
It is indeed.
You speak from experience, no need to cite sources.
 
espola said:
There is a psychological barrier to admitting one is wrong, especially for those who have been publicly adamant in their errors.

It is interesting to watch the hypocrites squirm.
Click to expand...
One thing we know we can't get is a rebuttal to my points. An admission, but not a rebuttal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top