@Wez - It's the point that you've been making elsewhere: There are Flt 2 teams who should have been in Flt 1. The rankings support that. I follow Boys 2005 so I have a better sense of that group's numbers.
Don't get to wrapped up in the actual rankings. There are limited number of data points and YSR is nation wide so there are not going to be adjustments for strength of schedule. Over time as more teams play each other and those data points are introduced into the system, outliers will fall back to the mean. Over the years YSR has been a much more accurate predictor of team strength than GS. If I'm scouting future opponents I always look at YSR to get a sense of their strength. GS is rarely helpful.
Are you saying some GS tournaments are awarded insane amounts of points even if it has bad teams competing? Or are you saying that some bad teams are ranked so high, the tournaments that include these bad teams are unfairly awarded more points?GS only ranks based on its own tournaments and some of those are worth insane amounts (no matter the actual competition.)
Some tournaments are worth a ton of points whether they have a great group of teams competing or a so-so group. Other tournaments are worth a ton and have commensurate competition.Are you saying some GS tournaments are awarded insane amounts of points even if it has bad teams competing? Or are you saying that some bad teams are ranked so high, the tournaments that include these bad teams are unfairly awarded more points?
WEZ, as Apmull said, the YS rankings will get better as time passes and more data points become available...the great thing about YSR being back online is that you will then have an objective third party ranking of the teams to support or your contentions about the proper placement of teams across the tiers in your age group...I get that. It's the fact that most of the B04 flt 1 teams finished below 3 flt 2 teams. I'm guessing many of the top ranked B04 flt 1 teams would be more than a match for the 3 flt 2 teams that outrank them.
This sounds reasonable, thank you.
WEZ, as Apmull said, the YS rankings will get better as time passes and more data points become available...the great thing about YSR being back online is that you will then have an objective third party ranking of the teams to support or your contentions about the proper placement of teams across the tiers in your age group...
The point value is based on the ranking of the teams registered. GS uses the 5 highest ranked teams in each flight. Each team in the top 1% of the age group is worth 10,000 points. So, most GS tournaments will accept at least 5 from the top 1%. That gives their flight a value of 10,000 points. You have enough age groups worth 10,000 points and your tournament becomes an elite tournament (for whatever that is worth). Tournaments like Surf cup who in the past only accepted a certain # of teams, could have the top flight worth 10K and the 2nd flight worth 8,500 (or something like that).Some tournaments are worth a ton of points whether they have a great group of teams competing or a so-so group. Other tournaments are worth a ton and have commensurate competition.
I find it very useful because it shows league games and most tournaments and I can see who played who ,the date and the score and do my own comparisons based on what I might personally know about the teams . And by clicking on an opponent of any team I'm looking at I can see their record . There is no other site that gives so much information and so many teams .Thanks for the breakdown of GS scoring. I've still always found YSR to be a better overall gauge of actual level. (When a team has enough data points.) Like any statistical model it breaks down when a team hasn't played enough opponents. So it maybe wildly out of whack for a while.
Depends on the tournaments they have played in.That would explain the difference between Beach and Strikers (both flt 2), but not why 17 of the 19 B04 flt 1 teams in SCDSL all ranked below two flt 2 teams.
How do these rankings differ from Got Soccer rankings? Which one is more accurate/reliable?
So how long do the scores from each game stay on the team's ranking site? GS deletes after a year or the next tournament - does YSR do the same?
1217, over time I noticed that the YSR is much smoother and not as volatile as GS. Teams are on a treadmill with GS. They have to constantly play GS tournaments and win(!) to replace what is falling off of the 12 month moving window.So how long do the scores from each game stay on the team's ranking site? GS deletes after a year or the next tournament - does YSR do the same?
Why not just email the admin of the site and ask?So how long do the scores from each game stay on the team's ranking site? GS deletes after a year or the next tournament - does YSR do the same?
Why not just email the admin of the site and ask?
Come watch us play this weekendThere is a U11 Flight 2 team ranked very very high that obliterates every team they've played. I haven't seen them play yet, but I just have a hard time believing that at this point in the year they're better than the above-average flight 1 teams I've seen play twice.
If my memory serves me correctly, it is 18 months. While that seems like a long time, it isn't when you consider the statistical methodology used for YS. With GS, you can play in a flight 2 tournament against low ranked teams, get awarded an insane amount of points and coast for an entire year. It is a reward only system. That team can literally lose every game after that for an entire year and maintain their ranking. YS adjusts up and down every single game while GS ignores losses. GS is deeply flawed but until tournaments quit letting them hold them hostage, their monopoly will continue.So how long do the scores from each game stay on the team's ranking site? GS deletes after a year or the next tournament - does YSR do the same?