Youth soccer murder case

Anyone see this story...a youth soccer player in Sylmar was allegedly murdered by his coach? Parents are now suing the city under the grounds that the city vets permits and failed to run a background check. It doesn't say which club he played at but according to grok it seems to be a low level club that either has played or did play in coast and otherwise has rec for the youngers. A few implications for all of us:

1. If the precedent is set that cities need to check background of all coaches of clubs permitting costs are going to go up and the city will stop doing it at a lot of locations
2. That in turn will drive the remaining smaller/ethnic clubs out of the market entirely or (like some Latino leagues such as during COVID) underground. Training space is already at a premium which means basically only the letter leaguers and AYSO will be able to afford it.
3. Coach was allegedly undocumented. Raises the question about whether the background checks are catching citizenship. If not, insurance is going to be going up on everyone in Socal. If so, hard to see how clubs will be able to get insurance on any coach without verifying work status.
4. In the end I don't think it goes anywhere (sovereign immunity is too hard) against the city but still scratching my head how soccer officialdom didn't catch it. Isn't this the point of all the requirements and the training?
5. Very much of a two tier system has begun to develop. The higher letter leagues with mega clubs get fully checked out employees and refs filling out 1099s while the lower you go on the chain the more of a die roll it becomes. In economics it becomes the airline ticket problem....my guess is the trend is the highest letter leagues (MLSN for the boys, ECNL for the girls) pull away due to the college recruiting opportunities and everything else in the middle just dies esp. once you hit the olders.

 
This was spoken about on insta and Facebook. I forgot the club but I thought it was somewhere near Lancaster. Here is the AI overview:

Southern California youth soccer coach, MEGA, was charged with the murder of 13-year-old OOH in April 2025
. The boy was allegedly killed on March 28, 2025, after going to the coach's home in Lancaster to help make team jerseys.
Key details of the case:
  • Victim: OOH, a 13-year-old boy who played for the Huracan Valley Boys Soccer Club in the Sylmar area.
  • Accused: MEGA, 43, was arrested in early April on an unrelated sexual assault charge before being charged with Hernandez's murder.
  • Timeline:
    • March 28, 2025: OOH goes to MEGA’s home and is allegedly murdered.
    • March 30, 2025: OOM is reported missing by his family.
    • April 2, 2025: OOM’s body is found in a ditch in Oxnard, about 60 miles from the coach's home.
    • April 7, 2025: MEGA is charged with murder with special circumstances, making him eligible for the death penalty.
    • June 29, 2025: The victim's cause of death is revealed as acute alcohol poisoning.
    • September 15, 2025: The victim's family files a legal claim against the city and county of Los Angeles, alleging negligence in not performing a proper background check on the coach.
  • Related accusations:
    • MEGA was reportedly investigated for sexual abuse in 2022, but a criminal case was not filed.
    • He was also accused of sexual abuse by another teen in February 2024, and a warrant for his arrest was issued shortly before OOM’s death.
  • Legal status: MEGA has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
 
Some level of background check is already required (Live Scan at least, and I think basic background as well, iirc), for US Soccer certification. I'm not sure that's required for all clubs, but it certainly is for any team official for my son's club (along with a number of other checks and certifications).

I don't think the various certifications and background checks really do anything, in my opinion at least. They would identify people who are convicted predators, but the chances that someone who is convicted of such is going to be applying for official certification to work with kids (with real identification information) is basically zero anyway. The safest approach as parents is to simply not allow kids to be alone with anyone you don't already know and trust, and that includes people who "seem nice", have certifications, etc. I wouldn't send my kid over to his coach's house alone, for example, even though I'm 99%+ certain it would be fine; it's just unnecessary risk, I don't know him personally, and no amount of certifications ever ensure that people are "safe".

When they are 12+, I'm personally okay leaving my kids alone with a group of other kids and a coach, at a training facility. That's about where I draw the line for my kids, personally.

I'm sure this will result in some other checkbox worthless certification requirement in California, though, and probably another form to sign when signing kids up to play sports. That seems to be the only thing the state is capable of doing.
 
Back
Top