That would be a deflection because the actual answer doesn't fit your preferred narrative. Grace is all over this. It is inconsistent and nonsensical, which is when people will no longer comply. The federal/state/local messaging and policy positions have been atrocious. Impossible to defend no youth sports outside but malls are open. Ticketing people for going to church and staying in their cars, but not ticketing people for standing next to each other in a mass group while breaking a curfew? Home Depot is OK, but not Best Buy? Looting is not an infection issue, but going alone to the beach is? The OC Park's department on its website this morning has a note providing that building a sandcastle is not permitted. Really? Care to explain that one? Doesn't say by more than one person, just not permitted. No umbrellas, either. Or sunbathing. I missed all the data out of Italy about how sitting alone under an umbrella at the beach was such a dangerous transmission risk. Target is OK, but people can't get married or have a funeral regardless of their mitigation activities? There is no data supporting that minor children engaged in sporting activity outside has proven to be any source of increased transmission risk to the kids, their families or the public at large. We now have several weeks of data from states where these activities are permitted. Where is the hospitalization spike connected to these activities in those states? There isn't one. Was government right to react aggressively in the face of an unknown risk? Sure. Has it been right to refuse to adapt to new information in a timely or consistent way? No, it hasn't. And why have those who refused to adapt tended to be Democrats? You remember that they are the science party, right? I guess only scary science, though. Gov. Whitmer threatened those protesting her shut in order with another month of restrictions based on the exposure risk the presented by protesting. I haven't heard any governor say that about these current protests, which are obviously dramatically larger. Have you? If COVID was such a risk that we needed to shut down the national economy and today keep it in largely a crippled state to protect the public against transmission of this virus, what difference would it make what the subject of the protest was? Exactly zero if we are talking science. But we aren't. We are talking politics in an election year.