What makes the A team of clubs so much better?

[TheMountie]

The bad news is because of the academies mls next and the now expanded mls 2 are unlikely to go grade year. So this might benefit the girls where ecnl dominates but not the boys (at least in SoCal where mls dominates)

My son was in the same boat. More good news bad news. Size and age is pretty much everything in the earlier ages and for boys it last until about 16 when it finally levels out (give or take a year). The problem is by then your kid will probably be ground down with frustration if they want to play at the highest level and will have to nose to grindstone it to stay competitive. It’s why so many kids who aren’t close to the birth line or early bloomers drop out by high school: the effort to get there isn’t worth it to them and there’s not a whole lot they can do to rebalance things in the early years.

We’re thinking of putting him in MLS Next as a bio band player for next season, and I’ve already spoken to a few coaches about this. Alternatively, we might spend a season in F1 Socal while playing on a second team in the CSL until ECNL makes the grade-year changes for 2026.

He’s turning 13 in September, and his appetite has increased significantly over the last 6 months, so we’re hoping for a growth spurt this year. If that doesn’t happen, we’re perfectly fine playing down until he physically develops more. He’s still putting in work with a personal trainer, and some backyard training. He understands now that coaches tend to value taller, faster, and stronger players early on, so he’s fully aware that this is a marathon, not a sprint.

 

[Socal-Soccer-Dad]

He understands now that coaches tend to value taller, faster, and stronger players early on, so he’s fully aware that this is a marathon, not a sprint.

Wise kid! Best wishes!

 

[Derek1800]

At our club, when there are - for whatever reason - limited number of available fields for that week, the A teams still train on whatever field is still available while B team trainings get cancelled..

And A team plays in better more prestigious tournaments.

And A team usually gets the "better" coaches although this is very subjective as you can imagine.

YMMV club to club and if all that's even worth it. I'd imagine if you can more or less be in the starting lineup on the A team more than 50% of the time, it's probably worth it...

There are not even enough great coaches to cover all the A teams for all the age groups. B teams with a great coach is extremely rare. This is a huge headwind unfortunately and I think a reason why US is behind in soccer. A players with access to the scarce resource burnout or do not have the genetics when older. The kids who might have a chance never got access to the top level coaching.

 

[Grace T.]

There are not even enough great coaches to cover all the A teams for all the age groups. B teams with a great coach is extremely rare. This is a huge headwind unfortunately and I think a reason why US is behind in soccer. A players with access to the scarce resource burnout or do not have the genetics when older. The kids who might have a chance never got access to the top level coaching.

I agree top level players burn out: the burnout is more in the form that you see in this thread and the mls one, heavier on the boys than girls side (perhaps due to scholarship numbers or gridiron football), that when they get to late middle school or high school they decide mls next is not for them (because it makes sense for college admissions only if you are going the college recruitment route and need the scholarship or are applying to a handful of institutions you need the admissions bump for). The pros on the boy side also all go through academies and a handful of other institutions and that’s decided for the most part by middle school on the boys side. The bigger issue on the non mls next side is the number of hours. You simply aren’t going to match European academies if you aren’t doing it non stop every day and the reality is few non academy players are working on things on their own every day for hours (to be fair neither are Europeans except for the academy players who are structured for those hours)

 

[JeterwastheBEST]

Stay on topic. I don't want this thread to be sent to The Kitchen

Oh, you mean "Slobodan"'s basement torture chamber?

 

[JeterwastheBEST]

So, in other words, Sean is following the rules like everyone else. How heroic he is.

It's "Slobodan's" sliced and diced "rights" world, were all just living in it....

 

[Slobodan]

It's "Slobodan's" sliced and diced "rights" world, were all just living in it....

Here's a friendly tip: When you've gone over your data minutes and grandma let's you back online 3 days later, fast forward to the most recent page. That way it's not as obvious you're a clown.

 

[watfly]

I agree top level players burn out: the burnout is more in the form that you see in this thread and the mls one, heavier on the boys than girls side (perhaps due to scholarship numbers or gridiron football), that when they get to late middle school or high school they decide mls next is not for them (because it makes sense for college admissions only if you are going the college recruitment route and need the scholarship or are applying to a handful of institutions you need the admissions bump for). The pros on the boy side also all go through academies and a handful of other institutions and that’s decided for the most part by middle school on the boys side. The bigger issue on the non mls next side is the number of hours. You simply aren’t going to match European academies if you aren’t doing it non stop every day and the reality is few non academy players are working on things on their own every day for hours (to be fair neither are Europeans except for the academy players who are structured for those hours)

Burnout certainly plays a role, but I think in a lot of cases there are just more, and arguably better, athletic options for kids when they get to HS.