Wez
DA
Still need a G99 "Superliga" team.
Am I the only one confused by each tournament deciding to call the flights something different?
Still need a G99 "Superliga" team.
Superliga has been the name of our top flight for 9 years.Am I the only one confused by each tournament deciding to call the flights something different?
Superliga has been the name of our top flight for 9 years.
The efficient market model doesn't work here. For it to work, the market has to be of sufficient size, participants have to act rationally, there has to be equal access to information, resources, etc.Of course, this means that if the market is against Friday night check-ins, there are alternatives to avoid this and eventually they should disappear. As of now, though, enough still have the drawing power to demand it.
The efficient market model doesn't work here. For it to work, the market has to be of sufficient size, participants have to act rationally, there has to be equal access to information, resources, etc.
Why do you insist on using the market model which you don't seem to know much about? How's it relevant in any case? Did espola hijack your account?It's certainly true xxx.
Check in freezes the roster, if it is a purpose.Why do we even need to check in at all?
Ref has a roster and player cards on the field, right?
That's funny. Economics smak from an anonymous internet soccer forum participant. Not sure why you would insist on denying the existence of a market or the existence of market forces either, especially with unsupported categorical statements, but if it makes you feel better, go for it. I don't need this.Why do you insist on using the market model which you don't seem to know much about? How's it relevant in any case? Did espola hijack your account?
Let me just use one example to show the fallacies of your pseudo intellectual "analysis." For economies of large scale to apply, there has to be cost savings. Tournaments are staffed by volunteer parents, so there's no cost to speak of in the first place, much less cost savings between Friday and Saturday check ins. Really pretty elementary stuff. Large multi-field complexes have nothing to do with check ins, as check ins don't have to be at a central location. They can be done at various venues.That's funny. Economics smak from an anonymous internet soccer forum participant. Not sure why you would insist on denying the existence of a market or the existence of market forces either, especially with unsupported categorical statements, but if it makes you feel better, go for it. I don't need this.
For the original poster, bottom line is that there are growing alternatives to Friday night check-ins if you consider that a deal breaker.
Let me just use one example to show the fallacies of your pseudo intellectual "analysis." For economies of large scale to apply, there has to be cost savings. Tournaments are staffed by volunteer parents, so there's no cost to speak of in the first place, much less cost savings between Friday and Saturday check ins. Really pretty elementary stuff. Large multi-field complexes have nothing to do with check ins, as check ins don't have to be at a central location. They can be done at various venues.
Bottom line for us volunteer team managers is that we want more options for our teams. Most of us wouldn't mind spending a few extra hours for our teams, if there's a reason for Friday check ins. For this reason I asked Vin why it was mandatory. How your long-winded and flawed "analysis" is relevant is beyond me.
Your answer doesn't make sense to me.A Tournament can use less parent volunteers for a Friday check in, same apply's to one venue. It is easy to send match reports to one location versus dividing them out to various locations. Check in is a better smoother process for a tournament if done at one location, whether that is Friday or Saturday AM. You have more control to make sure everyone is checked in and has their tournament stuff.
Why is checkin required you ask? Insurance plain and simple. The player card gives the player supplemental insurance. Cal South requires per their sanctioning that all teams are checked in, to verify players cards for insurance and medical release forms. People think it is for cheating, nope mostly insurance. It is just a coincidence it helps with cheating.
Maybe the refs would actually check the cards- or maybe not-the volunteers didn't even check card against player-refs aware of older kids playing down and now big deal.......My statement of "Makes Sense" was toward the reason for having check in at all vs just letting refs check roster against player cards on the field.