dk_b
GOLD
We did not discuss the BEAR implant. I have a close relationship with our surgeon so I will ask him.
My girls did the following: Thing 1 - patellar for right, patellar for left; Thing 2 - quad for right, patellar for left. Despite being identical, Thing 2's growth plates were a bit more open (long story as to likely why and not relevant here) and he felt that quad made more sense. This time, they are physiologically identical and their procedures are.
My understanding is that this surgeon does NOT do hamstring grafts for young athletes (perhaps non-athletes) and that the failure is higher and the impact on the athlete is greater. I have a family member who tore her ACL twice and the 2d time had to use hamstring (rather than cadaver (the highest failure rate among young athletes) or quad) b/c of the prior surgery (not the same surgeon for the 2d one for this person).
In looking at the BEAR implant just now, I am confident that while this injury will not go away, treatment will be very different in 5 or 10 years than it is today (just like it is so different compared to what it was when we were kids)
Rehab with the BEAR implant follows a pretty similar timeline as an graft-based ACL repair for an injury with no meniscus involvement (and despite what an MRI might say, one does not know whether there is meniscus until the wound is open - bruising is hard to detect on MRI and some bruising will be treated similarly to a tear (that is, no weight bearing for a longer stretch)). I can't see in the BEAR materials any reference to what happens if there is meniscus involvement (I am sure that info is there) but that may be why some surgeons are still not using it.
12914 - MMAN - Miach RevH BEAR Rehab Protocol Packet_V4 JD (miachortho.com)