Today in Fascism

This current wave of white rage didn’t come out out of nowhere. And it certainly didn’t begin as some kind of disagreement over tax policy. Or cultural identity.

It was a reaction to a black man becoming president. A man who held the highest office in the country with dignity. Who commanded global respect. And that single event ruptured the psychological contract white supremacy has relied on for centuries. An unspoken guarantee that the ultimate authority would always remain in white hands.

History told us exactly what was coming next. 

After the Civil War ended, reconstruction brought black voting. And with black voting came black lawmakers. Black congressmen. And black influence. The white answer was terror campaigns and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan.

The early 20th century brought black economic independence. The white answer was the red summer. The Tulsa Massacre. Rosewood. Entire communities wiped from the map.

This is a pattern America refuses to acknowledge. Whenever Black people gain stability and power. The white response is not debate.

It’s destruction. 

Black progress has never been halted through policy alone. Every time black Americans make social or economic headway. White Americans come to burn that progress down. 

The civil rights movement brought legal equality. And the white response was assassinations, church bombings, and state sanctioned violence. 

The current movement fits neatly into this pattern. It is the modern, sanitized, algorithm fed version of the same exact response. Rage at Black empowerment. Repackaged as grievance, conspiracy, and a movement to “take our country back”.

And the absolutely vitriolic response to the word WOKE gives the whole game away.

The term WOKE originated in the early 1900s. A warning for black communities to stay awake to racial injustice. To remain aware of systems explicitly designed to harm them. The open hostility towards it today is not accidental. 

The chants have been cleaned up. The symbols are mass marketed. The white robes were traded in for a suit and tie. And violence is often outsourced to bad actors.

But the hate remains unchanged. 

A black president dared to break the illusion of permanent white dominance. Now we have a movement that intends to restore it. It’s not subtle. It’s not coincidental. It’s historical. It’s predictable. It’s the latest in a long line of white on black violence.

Just like every movement rooted in the fear of losing (white)supremacy.

-Kalen Dion- 01/28/2026
 
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

1773295650768.png
 
Hüsker Dü said:
This current wave of white rage didn’t come out out of nowhere. And it certainly didn’t begin as some kind of disagreement over tax policy. Or cultural identity.

It was a reaction to a black man becoming president. A man who held the highest office in the country with dignity. Who commanded global respect. And that single event ruptured the psychological contract white supremacy has relied on for centuries. An unspoken guarantee that the ultimate authority would always remain in white hands.

History told us exactly what was coming next. 

After the Civil War ended, reconstruction brought black voting. And with black voting came black lawmakers. Black congressmen. And black influence. The white answer was terror campaigns and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan.

The early 20th century brought black economic independence. The white answer was the red summer. The Tulsa Massacre. Rosewood. Entire communities wiped from the map.

This is a pattern America refuses to acknowledge. Whenever Black people gain stability and power. The white response is not debate.

It’s destruction. 

Black progress has never been halted through policy alone. Every time black Americans make social or economic headway. White Americans come to burn that progress down. 

The civil rights movement brought legal equality. And the white response was assassinations, church bombings, and state sanctioned violence. 

The current movement fits neatly into this pattern. It is the modern, sanitized, algorithm fed version of the same exact response. Rage at Black empowerment. Repackaged as grievance, conspiracy, and a movement to “take our country back”.

And the absolutely vitriolic response to the word WOKE gives the whole game away.

The term WOKE originated in the early 1900s. A warning for black communities to stay awake to racial injustice. To remain aware of systems explicitly designed to harm them. The open hostility towards it today is not accidental. 

The chants have been cleaned up. The symbols are mass marketed. The white robes were traded in for a suit and tie. And violence is often outsourced to bad actors.

But the hate remains unchanged. 

A black president dared to break the illusion of permanent white dominance. Now we have a movement that intends to restore it. It’s not subtle. It’s not coincidental. It’s historical. It’s predictable. It’s the latest in a long line of white on black violence.

Just like every movement rooted in the fear of losing (white)supremacy.

-Kalen Dion- 01/28/2026
Click to expand...
You know Obama was a white president, too, right?
 
Many years ago I was visiting Jerusalem with a group of American Christians. As we approached the Dome of the Rock, a Muslim cleric unexpectedly invited us inside.

I was thrilled. Not only does the building contain the rock where Jews and Christians believe Abraham offered Isaac, it is also one of the most beautiful structures in the world.

Two couples in our group, however, were horrified.

“How can you enter a heathen place of worship?” they asked.

I was equally surprised by their reaction.

“Have you never entered a bank?” I asked, thinking of Christ’s remarks about Mammon.

Human beings are irrepressibly communal. Even hermits carry their communities with them into solitude. They read the books of their people, pray their prayers, and continue the conversation of the community from which they came. However solitary a life may appear, it is always lived in relation to some real or imagined social world.

Communities tend to organize themselves in one of two ways.

Some are centered-set communities. They are defined by a center—a shared story, set of convictions, or vision of life toward which people orient themselves as they move through the world.

Others are boundary-set communities. They are defined by their lines. Much of their energy is spent determining who is inside those lines and who must remain outside them.

The same community can contain people who experience it in both ways. Those who are centered-set see their loyalty as a continuing relationship to the center. Because of that confidence, they may explore other communities, ideas, and cultures without feeling that their identity is threatened.

Those who are boundary-set often interpret such curiosity very differently. If the primary task of a community is to defend its borders, then engagement with the outside world easily looks like compromise—or even betrayal.

This tension shows up everywhere.

America’s two major political parties were once largely centered-set communities. They organized themselves around competing visions of how best to pursue the nation’s shared ideals.

Today they increasingly function as boundary-set communities. Loyalty is often measured less by devotion to common principles than by hostility toward the other side.

The only thing the two parties reliably agree on is that everyone must choose between them. That leaves many citizens uneasy—especially those who may generally agree with the principles of one party but resist being confined entirely within its boundaries.

That is why a politician like James Talarico excites many people. He appears to operate more from a centered-set instinct than a boundary-set one. I do not agree with him on every issue. But watching a serious candidate treat those who disagree with him with kindness and respect is deeply refreshing. It reminds me of a time when such behavior was more common.

If he can survive his own party’s boundary-set culture, perhaps we may yet see similar responses from others. It might even become possible again to act like a Christian in public life without professing one’s faith through growls and insults.

A centered-set community requires a different kind of loyalty. It is not fear-based. It assumes that the center is strong enough to hold people even when they disagree about secondary matters.

Christians, for example, need not break fellowship with one another because their views about prophecy, politics, or the causes and cures of poverty differ. If the center—love of God and neighbor— remains secure, such disagreements do not threaten the community’s existence.

Boundary-set communities, however, tend to become preoccupied with controlling the narrative. Their discomfort with people who remain loyal to the community yet engage the wider world with curiosity leads them to call for purges and expulsions. In their view, the community is purified by making dissenting voices disappear.

In reality, boundary-set thinking often leads a community into an increasingly narrow and uncreative cycle. Over time the drive to purify the group becomes stronger than the desire to preserve its central ideas and practices.

Righteous crusades frequently devour the crusaders themselves, leaving their descendants little more than shameful memories—and the loss of a beauty and grace that might otherwise have been their inheritance.

The ends never justify the means, because the means employed shape the end achieved.

When the center is strong, the boundary can remain gentle. When the center is weak, the boundary—no matter how fiercely defended—cannot save the community because the energy and trust required to preserve it have already drained.

The Roman Empire discovered this. So did the Soviet Union. Empires rarely collapse because they are militarily weak. They collapse when large numbers of their people can no longer remember why the empire exists.

The same danger faces churches, denominations, and nations alike.
 
"Circa late 1981, when violence was creeping into punk shows across California and young men with shaved heads and swastika armbands began showing up at Dead Kennedys concerts not to enjoy the music but to hurt people, Jello Biafra wrote a sixty-three second song that would become one of the most important anti-fascist statements in the entire history of popular music. What makes the origin of 'Nazi Punks F*** Off' so extraordinary is that Biafra did not initially write it as a grand political anthem at all. He wrote it because he was furious that violent meatheads were ruining the experience for everyone at their shows. 'The initial premise of the song was, you violent people at shows are acting like a bunch of Nazis,' Biafra said years later. 'That was as far as it went. Then the real ideological Nazis began coming out of the closet.' The entire track, all eight songs on the In God We Trust, Inc. EP, was recorded live in a single session on August 22, 1981, a raw, furious burst captured in one room in one day. When Alternative Tentacles released 'Nazi Punks F*** Off' as a standalone seven-inch single in November 1981, they included something extraordinary with every copy, a free anti-swastika armband, a physical symbol of resistance that thousands of young people wore to shows across the country. That crossed-out swastika became one of the defining visual icons of the anti-racist movement that grew out of the punk scene through the entire decade and beyond. A sixty-three second song recorded in a single session, given away with a piece of cloth, changed the visual language of protest for a generation. The Dead Kennedys never set out to be spokespeople for anything except their own furious conscience, and that is precisely why the world listened. #DeadKennedys #NaziPunksFOff #PunkHistory #AntiRacism #fblifestyle"
 
Up is down and down is up.
Good is evil and evil is good.
Man is a woman and woman is a man.
The Party of Lies!!!

Tim McBride was born a man and is man, end of story. The fact I have to even debate this with my lefty pals is insane!!

Tim McBride, a MAN pretending to be a woman, for Women's History Month.

1773330129052.png
 
The same folks who blindly believe that Barack Obama was a secret Muslim who faked two forms of his birth certificate while being married to Michelle Obama, who was really born a man and was using the Ebola virus to kill white people — while Bill and Hillary Clinton were masterminds of a child trafficking ring being run in the basement of a pizza parlor at the same time Joe Biden was orchestrating and leading a massive, organized international crime syndicate while also somehow suffering from dementia and not knowing where he is — are also the same people who...

Blindly worship Trump and don't believe he's leading any cover-up of the Epstein files despite the indisputable facts that Donald Trump:

Is mentioned in Epstein files more than only one other person — Jeffrey Epstein.

Is on video bragging about sexually assaulting women.

Boasted about walking into the female dressing rooms at teen pageants, with multiple women confirming he did this.

Has cheated on every single one of his wives.

Once spoke about his infant daughter's breast size, agreed with Howard Stern that she's a "nice piece of ass," and said that "perhaps if she weren't his daughter, he would be dating her."

Had a well-documented friendship with Epstein for over 15 years.

Invited Epstein to his wedding.

Flew on Epstein's plane at least eight times.

Once encountered a girl who was no older than 10–12 at the time and said he would be "dating her in 10 years."

Has been accused by well over 20 women of sexual assault, with one ruling that found him liable for sexual abuse.

Is married to a woman who's young enough to be his daughter.

Has called the Epstein files a "hoax" and said that people needed to "move on" from it.

Has been accused by one woman of sexual assault who told the FBI she was 13 when the assault occurred.

Had an affair while married to his current wife, had the adult actress sign an NDA where he paid her $130,000 for her silence, then denied all of it despite indisputable evidence that she was under an NDA and was paid that sum of money.

They refuse to believe Trump has done anything wrong or is involved in any kind of cover-up despite everything I just listed being 100% indisputably true.

And I didn't even mention other aspects tied to the Epstein scandal, such as the FBI having its workers spend thousands of combined hours combing through these files for any mention of his name, the fact Pam Bondi told him weeks before they announced they were ending their investigation that he was mentioned in the files, the fact that when they decided to release the files they picked a holiday weekend when most Americans were distracted, and the fact that Trump has attacked two nations and done just about everything he can to distract from all of this since the Department of Justice hit the deadline during the holidays to release these files — which they still haven't fully complied with as of yet.

So, the people who blindly believe all those insane conspiracies about the Obamas, Clintons, and Bidens — with almost no credible evidence to support any of it — are the same folks who ignore all the indisputable facts I've just listed about Trump that paint him as a textbook example of a sexual predator, possibly of underage children. Yet they refuse to believe he has anything to do with any of that or that he's ordered his Department of Justice to do whatever they can to cover up these files.

And this is why I've said we need different levels of "insanity."

Because there's legitimate insanity — someone hears voices and cannot function within society without being a danger to themselves and others.

Then there are people who function within our society, work jobs, have families, and socialize with friends — yet will flat-out deny any facts or reality that don't support what they want to be true.

Which, in my opinion, is another form of insanity.
 
They know they cheated, they know they mandated mask and jabs and they know we know they did it to replace MAGA and those caught in the middle class. They & Them hate us and will do whatever it takes to destroy life. Du Du is doing what the left does for a living, cheat and lie.

Screenshot_20260312_112951_Truth Social.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top