Today in Fascism

espola said:
I have already done that several times. Why do you choose to ignore it?
Click to expand...
Telling us Biden was too old to run again doesn't make you an independent.

Fact is, anytime you get corned on a topic you ignore the post. Just like you did on this one.
 
Desert Hound said:
OK I will open this up to the rest...

@Slobodan @crush @kickingandscreaming @watfly

Can any of you remember a position on a T or R policy that @espola has supported? Does anyone recall him criticizing a D politician? (occasionally he might admit Biden was too old...but then passes over the fact that he doesn't criticize the other Ds that knew and hid it from the US)?
Click to expand...
Already responded. Yes, his scathing criticism of Biden probably being too old is the most horrific slander of a democrat I've ever heard.
 
espola said:
So now your proof is to point out things I didn't do? That's a real winning tactic there.
Click to expand...
It is a winning tactic... because what you "didn't do" is support your assertion of being an independent. You spend 95% of your time here bashing Trump. Even when Trump wasn't the one in office. The other thing you "didn't do" is criticize democrats. And if your life depended on it, you couldn't go through your 10,000 posts and find 3 times when you did.

Your most predictable move is being challenged and disappearing for a day. Henry Hill thinks you're made of egg noodles and katsup.
 
Desert Hound said:
Well instead of evading the answer...off the top of your head name a few recent T or R policies or proposals you like.

As a supposed independent it should be easy to name policies you support from either side of the spectrum.

If I claimed to be independent...I could quickly rattle off a few items.

I suspect you will avoid doing so.
Click to expand...
"... you're doing so well... please continue." - Fudd
 
Desert Hound said:
The report is in recently released court documents. One would assume those are correct. You then have a file released from the FBI.

So it is pretty safe bet he called the police.

Now the part that confuses you and the left is...your logic.

I can for instance hear sketchy things about you. In my circles I have heard you might be a predator. So when it comes out your are in trouble I call the police and say glad your are going after this guy. Check out his sidekick she might be the one helping out. That does not mean I know for a fact you are a pedo husker.

Yet in the case of T you are trying to make that jump. Which of course is partisan wish casting. The people associated with Epstein have overwhelmingly been Dems here or leftist abroad.
Click to expand...
“A conversation that may or may not have happened” but of course you latch on to it as written in stone. Do you believe everything in the files?
 
Its made me scratch my head many times. Plus, Joe and his crew of bandits didnt mandate the jabs to those WHO were replacing, only us. When my friend died of a heart attack, I had to show proof of being jabbed. Insane!!!

Screenshot_20260210_173248_Truth Social.jpg
 
Desert Hound said:
Well instead of evading the answer...off the top of your head name a few recent T or R policies or proposals you like.

As a supposed independent it should be easy to name policies you support from either side of the spectrum.

If I claimed to be independent...I could quickly rattle off a few items.

I suspect you will avoid doing so.
Click to expand...
I like the idea of voter ID, within limits.

I like the idea of balanced budgets.

I like the idea of the government performing within the limits set by the Constitution.

I have posted all of these and many more in the past when I had been challenged similarly. If you say now that you don't know that, then you are either being ignorant or dishonest -- pick one.
 
Slobodan said:
It is a winning tactic... because what you "didn't do" is support your assertion of being an independent. You spend 95% of your time here bashing Trump. Even when Trump wasn't the one in office. The other thing you "didn't do" is criticize democrats. And if your life depended on it, you couldn't go through your 10,000 posts and find 3 times when you did.

Your most predictable move is being challenged and disappearing for a day. Henry Hill thinks you're made of egg noodles and katsup.
Click to expand...
Epstein's dead already, so who deserves being bashed more than t?

One of my doctors recently asked me what I thought of my health condition. I told him I had an ambition to live long enough to piss on t's grave.
 
Last edited:
espola said:
Epstein's did already, so who could I bash more than t?

One of my doctors recently asked me what I thought of my health condition. I told him I had an ambition to live long enough to piss on t's grave.
Click to expand...
Based on your posts here, you are far more likely to die holding your semi-flaccid penis while fantasizing about T's assassination. But, I understand a man like you needs to be able to dream. If you were able to procreate, your progeny will have the opportunity to piss on T's statue - if they can raise themselves from their drug-induced stupor. Remind them to aim for the "middle" statue.
 
espola said:
One of my doctors recently asked me what I thought of my health condition. I told him I had an ambition to live long enough to piss on t's grave.
Click to expand...
How many Doctors do you have? I asked Google AI why someone would want to piss on someone's grave. You need help is all I can say and you should look into better doctors. Jesus can heal that hate bro, just saying.

Someone would want to urinate on a person's grave as an extreme act of disrespect, hatred, or contempt toward the deceased. It is a deliberate and provocative form of grave desecration, often stemming from a long-standing personal vendetta or intense malice.
The motivations typically center on:
  • Expressing intense hatred: The act is intended to demonstrate profound animosity toward the person who has died, especially if that person caused significant harm or abuse during their life.
  • Seeking closure or "taking back power": For some who were victims of abuse by the deceased (such as a narcissistic parent or abuser), the act can be a symbolic way to assert control and show that the person's influence and control end with death.
  • Vandalism and provocation: In some cases, the act is a general form of vandalism, often religiously or racially motivated, designed to provoke and cause distress to the deceased's family and community.
  • Fulfilling a promise (often a dark joke): Some instances, though rare, might involve someone making an extreme or darkly humorous "promise" to a despised individual that they would perform such an act after the person's death.
It is important to note that performing such an act is widely considered a crime, specifically grave desecration and public urination, and individuals have been arrested and charged for it. Death rituals and grave sites are generally considered sacred spaces for the living to mourn and remember their loved ones, and such acts are seen as highly offensive.
 
Since were all talking about "T" as in a Trillion dollars a year rip off to all of us, there is more fraud to uncover. Our tax dollars are funding Satanic Ritual Abuse and folks eating kids and drinking their blood. Seriously, let that sink in as you work tomorrow. This is insane!!!

New Scam Update!!!

1770778830729.png


"IRS SCANDAL EXPOSED You’re not going to believe this. Sen. Joni Ernst has revealed that IRS EMPLOYEES OWE ~$50,000,000 IN UNPAID TAXES. Yes. The people who enforce the tax laws… aren’t paying them. Let that sink in. Nearly 6,000 IRS employees, almost 10% of the agency, have significant unpaid tax balances. Average amount owed? About $8,000 per employee. These are not recent bills. Many are from prior years. Some didn’t even file. This isn’t a clerical issue. It’s a credibility crisis. These employees know exactly how the system works, what gets flagged, what doesn’t, and where enforcement is weak. That’s not just hypocrisy. That’s tax fraud risk inside the tax authority itself. So here’s the real question: Should Scott Bessent put IRS employees with unpaid taxes on probation, just like any other federal worker? Because, if the IRS won’t enforce the rules on itself, why should the public trust enforcement at all? Curious what you think." Melissa Redpill from X
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top