Today in Fascism

"Your cellmate's name is Puffy. Nice guy. Seems to like baby oil for some reason..."

1768312229844.png
 

I was on a plane last weekend, and the young lady next to me was wearing a mask - she was very pleasant. She politely told me that she wasn't wearing it because she was sick, but was trying to avoid what was going around. I politely responded, "No worries". Of course, she took it off to eat and drink :rolleyes:.

The Leftist authoritarians have succeeded in striking irrational fear into people. Those people become their "weapons" - subtly, such as those who enforce/encourage meaningless masking, and not so subtly with those who impede law enforcement and harass and assassinate those they disagree with. The Left will do everything possible to erode an individual's sense of independence and pit the fearful ones against those who do not fear. It's also why the Left hates traditional Christian religion so much. The Leftists can't survive among people who believe in traditional Judeo-Christian values. The Left is fine with lying to achieve whatever ends they deem necessary. Remember when CNN obviously posted misinformation and I pointed it out to @dad4? He responded that it was OK since they were trying to get people to wear masks. Leftists share this approach with Muslim teachings. This shared belief is why they partner so well now. Bearing "false witness" is a sin for Christians, and a way of life for Leftists and Islamists.

Internationally, there is some room for optimism among those who believe in the values that made our country great. The past few years have given me a deep appreciation for the raw courage of the Iranian women standing up to their evil leaders. If only we had more people like that here in the US to stand up to the vile, authoritarian Leftists. It is also encouraging to see many Venzuelans standing up and speaking out against the fools on the Left here in the US and abroad who support Maduro. Of course, you'd see little of this on the captured MSM. Praise God for X and Musk.
 
Leftists share this approach with Muslim teachings. This shared belief is why they partner so well now. Bearing "false witness" is a sin for Christians, and a way of life for Leftists and Islamists.
"You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor" Ninth Commandment

"A false witness who speaks lies" among things God hates- Proverbs 6:19

Jesus includes "You shall not bear false witness" Matt 19:18

Paul urges believers to "speak truth with his neighbor" Eph 4:25

False testimony was used to convict Jesus, Matt 26:59-60

False witnesses accused Stephen of blasphemy, leading to his martyrdom (Stoned to death) Acts 6

"Like a club or a sword or a sharp arrow is one who gives false testimony against a neighbor." Pro 25:18

Basically bro, a snitch is real loser but a snitch WHO lies like espola is an asshole and pure evil. It's the worst kind of human. espola said, "crush is the forums #1 liar." That's called projection because he just confessed WHO he truly is, the forums #1 liar. He's in big trouble with God. God loves everyone but God also hates liars. The father of lies on earth is Satan, hello.

Jesus told us WHO the liar truly is; "You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies." John 8:44

I was lied to as was my dd by liars in youth soccer. I called them out and we got squashed and kicked out of the Liars Club. They only care about making money off the girl's hard work and ACLs. Mandating them to play back-to-back-to-back games so the Liars Club can make money on parking and concessions. What a bunch of losers, that lie to a little girl.

1768317501633.png
 
Scott Adams has passed away - Rest In Peace - 🙏 Prayers to his friends and family.

1768318192587.png


Cancer SUCKS!!! He found the real truth before he died.

He spent his last breath doing everything he could to help the American people. This man was a patriot
 
ORAL ARGUMENTS: Supreme Court Hears Landmark Cases That Could Shape Future of Women's Sports:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::mad::rolleyes::oops::oops::rolleyes:

The fact this insane argument is brought before SCOTUS tells us all WHO was running the world. The biggest lie is that a man can be woman, just as long as the man considers himself to be a lady. I mean, come on man, this is nuts!!!
 
"There is no Satan." watty

Scott Adams passes away from cancer at 68, accepts Christ in final statement​

"I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior and look forward to spending an eternity with Him (and Charlie)."

I look forward to hanging out with you Scott. My pal Scott at Starbucks is next:cool: The thief on the cross found his faith at his last hour. Whatever it takes.
 
"We will not show up and share what we know about Epstein and our relationship with him!!!"
1768319166573.png


Losers WHO lie will lose at the end, TRUST ME!!!
 
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
 
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
Have you noticed the Left has stopped placing effort on pushing the “Climate Crisis”?
 
Back
Top