Today in Fascism

BREAKING: We The People demand ACCOUNTABILITY!

Dear Mr. POTUS,

I know you are listening to We the People. This message is sent on behalf of a very frustrated 79 million Americans who voted for you and millions more who refuse to be ignored.

Therefore, we are designating

2026 as

THE YEAR OF
ACCOUNTABILITY!

Why now?

Because the country is at a breaking point.

Our freedoms are being chipped away in plain sight.

Our government has grown bloated, arrogant, and unaccountable.

Public trust has not merely declined; it has been obliterated.

Power has been stripped from citizens and hoarded by bureaucrats, agencies, and unelected elites.

Those who call themselves leaders protect each other while the American people pay the price.

Civic duty has vanished from classrooms, replaced by obedience and ideology.

The family, once the backbone of this nation, has been systematically weakened and devalued.

Enough is Enough!

At its core, this is not partisan.

All Americans are demanding ACCOUNTABILITY.

We the People reject the lies, the gaslighting, the censorship, and the deliberate erosion of our lived reality over the past decade.

We remember what was done.

We know who did it.

We are no longer willing to move on without consequences.

The message is unmistakable and unstoppable.

Americans demand ACCOUNTABILITY.

So, Mr. POTUS, the question for you to answer is simple.

Will you stand with We The People or will you protect the system that failed us?

Make 2026 the year of ACCOUNTABILITY.

We will stand with you through thick and thin like we always have, but you must respect our wishes.

If you don’t, as our founders warned, the deep state concentration of power in government will lead to greater corruption and eventual tyranny.

And your legacy in history will be tarnished beyond repair.

Respectfully,

1 of the 79 million voters" The People's General, Michael Flynn

cc:
@JDVance1
@SusieWiles
@StephenM
@SecRubio
@DNITulsiGabbard
@SecWar
@AGPamBondi
 
1767409744914.png
 
Hüsker Dü said:
You’re Not Watching the Same Country on These Three Channels

Earlier today, I copied and pasted the last three days of video titles straight from the YouTube pages of CNN, CBS News, and Fox News. That’s it. No cherry-picking, no deep archive dive, no weeks of research. Just what each network chose to push over the last three days. Then I posed a simple question to chatgpt: what do you see in this and what type of government does each network support through their programing choices? ? What follows is the answer I got — and it says a lot more about power and why we are so divided in our own neighborhoods than you might expect.

CNN: Power Is Dangerous — Watch It Closely

Owned by: Warner Bros. Discovery
CEO: David Zaslav

CNN’s feed leans hard into international conflict, investigations, and institutional stress. Ukraine. Russia. Nigeria. Epstein documents. Shadow fleets. Consequences. The throughline is risk — not drama, not comfort, but instability.

CNN still operates under a liberal-democratic watchdog assumption: power corrodes, institutions fail, and sunlight is supposed to matter. Leaders are framed as potential liabilities, not saviors. Even when Trump appears, it’s usually in the context of what this means for global stability, not personal greatness.

Warner Bros. Discovery is a massive corporate conglomerate, but it is not structurally dependent on Trump’s political survival. That distance shows. CNN’s government preference isn’t radical — it’s uneasy. A democracy that only survives if someone keeps the doors unlocked and the lights on.

CBS News: The System Will Hold — Try Not to Panic

Owned by: Paramount Global
Controlling shareholder: Shari Redstone
CEO: Bob Bakish

CBS tells a calmer story. Weather disasters. Consumer habits. Polls. Seasonal spending. Even when covering war, Trump, or Epstein, the tone is measured and detached — almost therapeutic.

CBS treats politics as background noise and crises as episodic. The assumption is continuity: the system bends, absorbs shocks, and keeps moving. Authority is legitimate by default. Structural failure is rarely the headline.

Paramount’s leadership is deeply invested in long-term regulatory relationships and legacy stability. Their incentive isn’t confrontation — it’s order. CBS’s preferred government model is managerial: steady hands, calm tone, no rocking the boat. Even when the boat is clearly taking on water.

Fox News: Power Is Good — As Long As Our Guy Holds It

Owned by: Fox Corporation
Chairman: Rupert Murdoch
CEO: Lachlan Murdoch
Fox News CEO: Suzanne Scott

Fox isn’t subtle. Their feed is saturated with Trump praise, border panic, ICE hero narratives, Christianity as political identity, judges as enemies, critics as traitors, and military force as virtue.

Fox does not scrutinize power. It sanctifies it.

This isn’t accidental. Rupert Murdoch’s long-documented relationship with Trump, the revolving door between Fox personalities and the administration, and the network’s function as a messaging arm all show up in plain sight. Law is legitimate when it obeys the leader. Force is moral when aimed downward. Loyalty matters more than truth.

Fox’s preferred government model is unmistakable: a strongman state, wrapped in flags and faith, where dissent is disloyalty and obedience is patriotism.

Here’s the Part That Actually Matters

CNN asks, “What happens if this goes wrong?”
CBS asks, “How do we keep this from feeling scary?”
Fox asks, “How do we protect the man in charge?”

CNN treats democracy as fragile.
CBS treats democracy as durable.
Fox treats democracy as negotiable.

That difference isn’t about tone or bias. It’s about ownership, access, and proximity to power.

When media owners benefit from stability, you get normalization.
When they benefit from access, you get obedience.
When they benefit from chaos, you get propaganda.

So the next time someone says, “It’s just the news,” ask a better question:

Who owns the microphone — and what is their objective?

—from The Broken Republic
Click to expand...
At least you finally gave some credit where credit is due.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
This is corruption. Not subtle. Not debatable. Corruption. And if it were any other president, it would be a defining scandal. The Wall Street Journal just reported that Donald Trump’s pardon operation has effectively become a cash-for-clemency system.

People tied to Trump are charging around $1 million just to advocate for a pardon, with totals climbing far higher if the pardon actually comes through. No neutral DOJ review. No meaningful safeguards. Just money, access, and favors.

That’s not mercy.
That’s selling justice.

A presidential pardon exists for one reason: to correct injustice when the system fails. It is supposed to be careful, rare, and grounded in fairness. What’s happening now flips that idea on its head.

If you’re rich, connected, or politically useful, your conviction can disappear. If you’re not, the system comes down on you at full force.

And that’s where the moral rot really shows.

Because while pardons are quietly being shopped to wealthy insiders, the same administration is running one of the most aggressive deportation campaigns in modern U.S. history. ICE is conducting mass community arrests.

People with no criminal records are being taken from their homes and workplaces. Families are being torn apart to meet raw numerical targets.

Justice for sale at the top. Punishment without mercy at the bottom.

House Judiciary Democrats estimate that Trump’s pardon spree has already wiped out over $1.3 billion in fines and restitution owed to victims — money that was supposed to go to people harmed by crime, not vanish because someone knew the right fixer.

That’s not abstract corruption. That’s real harm, transferred upward.

This is the oligarch playbook in plain sight.The rich buy forgiveness.The vulnerable get the boot.

If a Democratic president were caught running a pardon marketplace it would dominate the news for months. There would be hearings. There would be investigations. There would be resignations.

But with Trump, the outrage barely registers. Corruption has been normalized. Abuse of power has been priced in.

And that normalization is the real danger.

A system cannot call itself just when freedom depends on wealth and cruelty is reserved for those without it. Equal justice under law means nothing if mercy is auctioned off and punishment is automated.

And the fact that this barely makes the front page should terrify all of us.
Click to expand...
Maybe I spoke too soon.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Why JD Vance is the real 2028 threat — and why his billionaire backing should scare you more than Trump ever did.

Donald Trump was loud. He was corrupt in public. You could see the danger coming a mile away. JD Vance is different — and that’s exactly the problem.

Vance is being groomed, quietly and deliberately, as the next leader of the Republican Party.

While Trump absorbs the chaos and attention, Vance is building something far more durable: a billionaire-funded political machine designed to lock in power and deepen wealth inequality long after Trump is gone.

This isn’t speculation. According to reporting from Axios, Vance is already laying the groundwork for a 2028 presidential run — traveling the country, campaigning for GOP candidates, consolidating donor relationships, and positioning himself as Trump’s loyal successor without ever challenging him directly .

But the real story isn’t Vance’s ambition. It’s who is financing it.

Unlike Trump, whose support came from a mix of small donors, media hype, and old-school Republican money, Vance is backed by venture capitalists and tech billionaires — most notably Peter Thiel.

Thiel poured millions into Vance’s Senate run and helped turn him from a fringe candidate into a national figure. Reuters has reported on how donor networks tied to Vance and Thiel are actively working to push U.S. politics further right using money, media, and tech infrastructure .

These are not populists. These are people who benefit directly from extreme wealth concentration — and who want a government that protects capital, weakens regulation, and keeps taxes low for the ultra-rich.

That’s the core contradiction of JD Vance. He talks about working-class pain. He rails against elites. But his entire political rise has been powered by elites who see democracy as something to manage, not honor.

Peter Thiel himself has openly questioned whether democracy and freedom are even compatible — a worldview that should alarm anyone who believes political power should belong to voters, not investors.

And when it comes to actual policy, Vance offers nothing that would meaningfully reduce inequality.

No serious push to tax billionaires. No challenge to private equity or venture capital excess. No plan to break up monopolies or rein in corporate power. Instead, we get culture wars, nationalism, and “anti-woke” rhetoric — distractions that keep voters angry while wealth keeps flowing upward.

This is the danger of JD Vance in 2028.

Trump’s chaos damaged institutions. Vance could capture them.

With disciplined messaging, massive donor backing, and tech-savvy political infrastructure, Vance represents a cleaner, more efficient form of oligarchic rule. Less spectacle. More control. Less scandal. More inequality.

And if we only prepare to fight the loud version of authoritarianism, we may miss the quieter one — the one funded by billionaires, optimized by venture capital, and sold to voters as “populism” while the richest Americans tighten their grip on power.

This is not just about 2028.
It’s a warning about where American politics is headed — unless we confront the money behind it now.
Click to expand...
And once again..another copy-and-paste. Maybe make a New Year's resolution to pull your head out of your..well..you know.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
🇺🇸 Who Karoline Leavitt Really Is

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt often presents herself as a defender of “family values,” “traditional America,” and moral order. From the podium, she speaks as if she represents discipline, seriousness, and ethical clarity — not just policy, but character.

But when you look past the talking points and examine the record, the image falls apart.

Leavitt had her child in July 2024. She did not marry the child’s father, wealthy real estate developer Nicholas Riccio, until January 2025 — just days before Donald Trump’s inauguration. Leavitt is 28 years old. Riccio is around 60. That is an age gap of more than three decades.

Those are not opinions. They are facts.

This isn’t about judging anyone’s personal life. It’s about credibility. If you are going to publicly lecture the country about “traditional values,” you don’t get to exempt yourself from the standards you demand of others.

Before this relationship, there is no record of independent wealth, business success, or notable achievement outside of partisan political work. Leavitt lost a congressional race, left her campaign more than $300,000 in debt, and held a series of low-level political staff positions. Despite this, she now stands at the White House podium positioning herself as a moral authority for the nation.

Then there’s professionalism.

When asked a serious, informed question by a reporter about Ukraine and the 1994 Budapest Memorandum — an agreement in which Russia pledged not to invade Ukraine in exchange for nuclear disarmament — Leavitt did not offer an answer.

Instead, she responded with a juvenile insult.

That response didn’t just reflect on her personally. The Press Secretary speaks for the President of the United States. For the administration. For the country. Dismissing legitimate foreign policy questions with sarcasm signals contempt for the press, for expertise, and for the public’s right to understand how power is being exercised.

This isn’t confidence.
It isn’t strength.
And it certainly isn’t leadership.

It’s branding without substance.
Moral posturing without moral authority.
Immaturity occupying a role that demands seriousness.

The White House podium is not a comment section. It is not a stage for snark or deflection. It is one of the most consequential communications roles in American government.

A role model raises standards.
A role model respects the office they hold.
A role model understands the weight of their words.

Karoline Leavitt has shown the public who she is — not through attacks, but through her own conduct. And it’s fair to say she is not someone anyone should be looking to for guidance, values, or leadership.

Cosplay administration, appealing to the underdeveloped minds of today’s conservatives
Click to expand...
Three letters...K-J-P.

But please continue. Don't let me get in the way of you continuing to make yourself look like a total idiot.
OOPS!! Too late!!
 
Hüsker Dü said:
www.japantimes.co.jp

Trump says Maduro 'captured and flown out' of Venezuela

The Venezuelan leader and his wife were captured by elite U.S. special forces troops and flown out of the country following larges-scale strikes on the Latin American nation.
www.japantimes.co.jp www.japantimes.co.jp
Click to expand...
That was a big piece on the evil chess board. He will sing and give up WHO is funding him. Listen up loser, my nephew Dave and million more Americans over the years were murdered by these drug lords sponsored by the _ _ _! Your time is up pal. You chose to hate Americans and instead chose to be a traitor. Now comes the pain!!!
 
"The United States of America has successfully carried out a large scale strike against Venezuela and its leader, President Nicolas Maduro, who has been, along with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country. This operation was done in conjunction with U.S. Law Enforcement. Details to follow. There will be a News Conference today at 11 A.M., at Mar-a-Lago. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" President DONALD J. TRUMP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top