Today in Fascism

"
Jonathan Turley
Opinion columnist
"

Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the GW Law faculty in 1990, and in 1998, became the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history.

He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Older Prisoners (POPS). He has written more than three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals including those of Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, and Northwestern Universities, among others. He most recently completed a three-part study of the historical and constitutional evolution of the military system.

Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades, including his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four former U.S. Attorney Generals during the Clinton impeachment litigation. Professor Turley also has served as counsel in a variety of national security and terrorism cases, and has been ranked as one of the top 10 lawyers handling military cases.

He has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues, and is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. He also is a nationally recognized legal commentator; he ranked 38th in the top 100 most cited ‘public intellectuals’ in a recent study by Judge Richard Posner and was found to be the second most cited law professor in the country.

He is a member of the USA Today board of contributors and the recipient of the “2005 Single Issue Advocate of the Year” – the annual opinion award for the Aspen Institute and The Week magazine. More than 400 of his articles on legal and policy issues regularly appear in national newspapers. He also has worked as the CBS and NBC legal analyst, respectively, during national controversies.

 
Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the GW Law faculty in 1990, and in 1998, became the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history.

He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Older Prisoners (POPS). He has written more than three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals including those of Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, and Northwestern Universities, among others. He most recently completed a three-part study of the historical and constitutional evolution of the military system.

Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades, including his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four former U.S. Attorney Generals during the Clinton impeachment litigation. Professor Turley also has served as counsel in a variety of national security and terrorism cases, and has been ranked as one of the top 10 lawyers handling military cases.

He has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues, and is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. He also is a nationally recognized legal commentator; he ranked 38th in the top 100 most cited ‘public intellectuals’ in a recent study by Judge Richard Posner and was found to be the second most cited law professor in the country.

He is a member of the USA Today board of contributors and the recipient of the “2005 Single Issue Advocate of the Year” – the annual opinion award for the Aspen Institute and The Week magazine. More than 400 of his articles on legal and policy issues regularly appear in national newspapers. He also has worked as the CBS and NBC legal analyst, respectively, during national controversies.


It appears that you agree that that article you linked was his opinion.
 
Haven't all of t's followers switched to TRUTH by now?
I have android and right now only Apple allowed to use TS. I did sign up on my computer and just waiting for the truth to go live for all to see. Once Elon has Twitter 100% under his control and TruthSocial is under t's control, then the truth will be dripped. The a big red wave and then trials and tribulation for all eyes to see.
 
.
From the article linked:
Jonathan Turley Opinion columnist

Good job Clouseau...

Here are some more opinions. I formulated a concept that I call the Texas Poker Pot after I witnessed a poker game among my Navy roommates when I was in aviation electronics school at NAS Memphis. Twitter has value only because of its traffic. If a significant proportion of users rebel and move somewhere else or to a newly-created phenomenon (such as t's highly successful move to TRUTH), Musk will be left with a very expensive, but empty, pot.

 
Last edited:
So is this a king play by Musk? Maybe he has unresolved control issues.
Musk is a risk taker, and paying 46B for a company that makes very little money / loses money seems a large risk to me. Who knows what his intent is or why. I would expect him to reinstate T though, that will generate some more traffic / revenue.
 
Here are some more opinions. I formulated a concept that I call the Texas Poker Pot after I witnessed a poker game among my Navy roommates when I was in Aviation electronics school at NAS Memphis. Twitter has value only because of its traffic. If a significant proportion of users rebel and move somewhere else or to a newly-created phenomenon (such as t's highly successful move to TRUTH), Musk will be left with s very expensive, but empty, pot.

I'm sure your concept is fascinating, thanks Magoo...
Twitter has been losing money for a while...
Wondering, how many of Musk's investments have turned into empty pots?
 
Musk is a risk taker, and paying 46B for a company that makes very little money / loses money seems a large risk to me. Who knows what his intent is or why. I would expect him to reinstate T though, that will generate some more traffic / revenue.
t said he don’t want none.
 
Answer the question, truly ignore or just dont respond? @Hüsker Dü, ask him to be more clear of the truth. I understand I am a waste of his time.
When Tweedledum and Tweedledee ignore you it's not because they don't like you or understand you it's because they can't handle people who speak up against their leftist agenda. Take it as a badge of honor..
 
Fake news surely. If T can get back on twitter with tens of millions of followers, I don't see any principle he pretends to have standing in his way.
Complete lack of principle. Maybe that’s the attraction, the cult were tired of all the accountability and morals they were surrounded with growing up. That and he gave them someone to blame.
 
I have android and right now only Apple allowed to use TS. I did sign up on my computer and just waiting for the truth to go live for all to see. Once Elon has Twitter 100% under his control and TruthSocial is under t's control, then the truth will be dripped. The a big red wave and then trials and tribulation for all eyes to see.
It's also interesting as the two appear to work in tandem.. Magoof and Sunshine. One ignores you and the other does as well. It's like they're BFFs messaging each other at night... " hey, let's ignore xyz today because I can't handle their truth"

Don't worry... be happy.
 
Complete lack of principle. Maybe that’s the attraction, the cult were tired of all the accountability and morals they were surrounded with growing up. That and he gave them someone to blame.
Who do you blame Daffy?
What principles come to mind regarding the withdrawal from Afghanistan?
What cult leaves behind their citizens and thousands of Afghan allies?
What grown up plan results in 13 US service personnel losing their lives? And attacks innocent people with drones killing 10?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top