Liberals don't understand words like "antithetical" or "hypocrisy". If you could please drop a "fascism" or "Hitler" in there, it could resonate.No kings, but yes on 50? Those are completely antithetical. That takes a special kind of stupid.
Liberals don't understand words like "antithetical" or "hypocrisy". If you could please drop a "fascism" or "Hitler" in there, it could resonate.No kings, but yes on 50? Those are completely antithetical. That takes a special kind of stupid.
They should be thanking the Orange President. He's gotten more fat, pasty white people outside and upright than anything Arnold's Presidential Fitness Challenge accomplished.I think you're looking at this the wrong way. The more people, the more it reaffirms that Liberals have nothing substantive to offer American citizens. That's why I'm such a supporter of absolute free speech, you can't hide stupidity.
Absolute Free Speech has consequences (death) and with these lunatics running around, it's a very concerning. USSS found a hunting stand in direct connections to T's plane in Palm Beach.I think you're looking at this the wrong way. The more people, the more it reaffirms that Liberals have nothing substantive to offer American citizens. That's why I'm such a supporter of absolute free speech, you can't hide stupidity.
What did wikipedia get wrong? Here is a hint for you -- the numbers in brackets refer to footnotes. Usually, those footnotes include a reference to somewhere outside of wikipedia, and usually those are accessible by any keyboard (except maybe yours, based on your posting here). You can look up the sources and see how much is quoted from them or influenced by their contents.You know anybody can post anything on wikipedia right? I've already educated you about that and you continue to use it as some kind of source.
Second, lots of people "assert" things, don't they? You republican haters really choose to hang your hats on some dumb shit.
Poor Charlie Kirk can't even be happy today on his keyboard. Listen up traitor, nothing happy about coming on here every day to combat your cheating, lying, stealing, support for masks and jabs and get fired if you say no and your support for assassinations has all of us very concerned. Dom allows you to post on here and you support the murder of your opponent without due process.Happy keyboarding!
+++ your due process support for drug smugglers, human smugglers, Kilmar and Pedos is also super fucking concerning to the rest of us. Good luck espola & Du Du, you're going to need it.Poor Charlie Kirk can't even be happy today on his keyboard. Listen up traitor, nothing happy about coming on here every day to combat your cheating, lying, stealing, support for masks and jabs and get fired if you say no and your support for assassinations has all of us very concerned. Dom allows you to post on here and you support the murder of your opponent without due process.
No kings day.
Someone else posted this observation."Funny how the party of “diversity is our strength” just had a No Kings protest that was 95% old white boomers." Catturd
I'm not interested in what "usually" references anything from Wiki. Nor do I concern myself with what others THINK Jordan should have known. Those aren't facts. The fact that you have to use sources like Wikipedia and unhinged libtards on facebook to substantiate your positions says everything.What did wikipedia get wrong? Here is a hint for you -- the numbers in brackets refer to footnotes. Usually, those footnotes include a reference to somewhere outside of wikipedia, and usually those are accessible by any keyboard (except maybe yours, based on your posting here). You can look up the sources and see how much is quoted from them or influenced by their contents.
Happy keyboarding!
You are almost there. Please continue.I'm not interested in what "usually" references anything from Wiki. Nor do I concern myself with what others THINK Jordan should have known. Those aren't facts. The fact that you have to use sources like Wikipedia and unhinged libtards on facebook to substantiate your positions says everything.
In other words, what someone THINKS Jim Jordan SHOULD have known, more than 25-years ago, isn't relevant today... OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT a butthurt, Trump trashing George Clooney drove the project. "There's not going to be a President Donald Trump... um... that's not gonna happen."
Good call, George.
Since you refuse to take your nose out of your shot glass, I did some of your research for you.You know anybody can post anything on wikipedia right? I've already educated you about that and you continue to use it as some kind of source.
Second, lots of people "assert" things, don't they? You republican haters really choose to hang your hats on some dumb shit.
Your schtick gets really boring.You are almost there. Please continue.
Anybody can accuse anybody of anything. There was no credibility to the "accusations" because they don't know what he did or didn't know. They said he SHOULD have known. That's their opinion and it's not the same as being accused of knowing and remaining silent... which is what I said. Or at the very least, what their lawyers told them to say so they could get some settlement money from the university. How else were they going to get their checks for $250k?Since you refuse to take your nose out of your shot glass, I did some of your research for you.
You posted "but you do realize Jim Jordan was never charged for anything let alone be accused of knowing and keeping silent".
Rebuttal (from footnote [49] in the wikipedia article I posted) --
Rep. Jim Jordan, the powerful Republican congressman from Ohio, is being accused by former wrestlers he coached more than two decades ago at Ohio State University of failing to stop the team doctor from molesting them and other students.
![]()
Powerful GOP politician accused of turning blind eye to sexual abuse at Ohio State
"It's sad for me to hear that he's denying," said one former wrestler. "I don’t know why he would, unless it’s a cover-up."www.nbcnews.com
Cindy McCain, No Name's wife, said everyone in her circle knew Epstein was running a blackmail operation on those Islands, using kids as part of the blackmail props with full on abuse and no one turned him in. By law she and No Name "should" have reported but did not. If Jim knew of abuse and turned his cheek, we need to know why. These are grown adults at Big U. Epstein used children for his blackmail.Anybody can accuse anybody of anything. There was no credibility to the "accusations" because they don't know what he did or didn't know. They said he SHOULD have known. That's their opinion and it's not the same as being accused of knowing and remaining silent... which is what I said. Or at the very least, what their lawyers told them to say so they could get some settlement money from the university. How else were they going to get their checks for $250k?