In all the leagues theres a couple, maybe 3-4 teams at the top that tend to win most of the time. Everyone else sometimes wins also doesnt win.Is DPL and ECRL leagues about equal in level at the 2010 age?
Followed by NPL and E 64 below?
And at the top GA and ECNL ?
All about the winning record? I give the scouts a little more credit than that. A winning record in a weak league isn’t going to fool anyone. The real test is what you can do against strong opponents.In all the leagues theres a couple, maybe 3-4 teams at the top that tend to win most of the time. Everyone else sometimes wins also doesnt win.
No matter the league being on a team that usually wins is important because most of the leagues you mentioned are national in some form or another. If you win most of the time your team will get invited to a higher level of play against other really good teams across the nation. This is how leagues provide high level competition to winning teams if it's not available locally.
For youth the end goal of being on a winning team is to get noticed by a higher level. For girls this would be college. For boys it would be pro or college.
The reason that theres multiple league options is because clubs need to show wins to keep parents paying and players engaged. If there was only one league for eveyone in Socal that would mean there is only one top team. Clubs have figured out anyone can be a winner if you can choose the teams you play against. Overall having more leagues creates more top players which is a good thing. General FYI college coaches know which clubs independent of league produce better players + will keep an eye on them.
Reguarding which league is better/worse than the others. We have to wait for events like Surf Cup where they all play to find out.
Nice job trying to diminish players achievements.All about the winning record? I give the scouts a little more credit than that. A winning record in a weak league isn’t going to fool anyone. The real test is what you can do against strong opponents.
National events are a ridiculously expensive way to get high level competition. $500 to $1000 per kid per game. There‘s got to be a better way than that.
So many leagues now. 5 years ago, within one week, I was sold GDA but no HS soccer allowed. We said no because. Then I was sold ECNL as #2 league in SoCal. Then we were sold this new league called DPL. Word on the street was that ECNL was going OB in Socal. We talked as a family and decided to go #2 league in ECNL OC. I was told DPL was the new #2 league in Socal and I was making a big mistake. Here's the truth. Forget the leagues and find out what your dd wants. Today you guys have AYSO, ECNL, ECRL, ECRL 2, GA, E64, NPL, DPL and someone just told me DPL 2 is in the works. Level of play is all over the place for sure. I see soccer players like this: The best of the best (Alyssa Thompson and Trinity Rodman). I saw with my eyes what makes these players special and one thing comes to mind, speed!!! The next best are the players like Shaw, Aikey, Turner, Jackson and the like. After that, you have great soccer players that are everywhere in every league and then you have the good players. Nothing wrong with good/great either. My dd is good and can be great when she wants to be and can battle the best and even the best of the best players and likes to play with her friends and have fun. Not about a college deal or making $$$$. Good luck to your players.Is DPL and ECRL leagues about equal in level at the 2010 age?
Followed by NPL and E 64 below?
And at the top GA and ECNL ?
Is DPL and ECRL leagues about equal in level at the 2010 age?
Followed by NPL and E 64 below?
And at the top GA and ECNL ?
Wow, rankings for leagues now? Futbol dad knows his stuff and the lay of the land. I would go with his rankings
How did he do that by pointing out two honest things?Nice job trying to diminish players achievements.
I assume the majority of ECNL Discovery Players are coming from GA teams? You can make the same argument for RL players...how often are ECNL teams bringing up RL players during the middle of a season? Why not bring in a Discovery Player from a GA team instead of building a player from within and bringing up a RL player? I guess these clubs decided that their RL players are not capable of being developed into NL players.
Different age groups can vary. As an example Surf g2010 ECNL has mostly played together for a long time + consistantly wins. However Surf g2011 ECNL is being rebuilt from scratch + likely wont be as dominate (initially).I would imagine that rating is for league In general within every age group I would think there is difference in levels. ECNL will still rank on top at every age. 2008s. RL and GA and top NPL teams seem stronger then the DPL teams. Based on state rankings of teams.
Maybe I am a little biased to GA but my kid has played both ECNL and GA so I've seen both sides of the coin.How did he do that by pointing out two honest things?
It's becoming quite obvious that you're continuously being dishonest in order to promote GA. I don't think you need to do that. We're all here to help each other. Scouts are not looking for winning teams. They want to see how players play, especially against tough competition.
Maybe you should have your kids play AYSO rec and win everything 100 to 1. that'll get the scouts noticing to recruit your player and you won't have to spend so much on traveling fees and club fees.
Maybe I am a little biased to GA but my kid has played both ECNL and GA so I've seen both sides of the coin.
My experience has been that being on a top team with a good coach that practices and plays games close to your house is more important than playing in a specific league.
You tend to get a lot of "ECNL is the best" comments on this site and I can say without a doubt that it's only true in Socal if your kid is playing on the top 3-4 teams.
Not really my point.Nice job trying to diminish players achievements.
Believe it or not but 10 years ago ECNL was on the ropes + accepting whoever would join (Sharks).
Maybe I am a little biased to GA but my kid has played both ECNL and GA so I've seen both sides of the coin.
My experience has been that being on a top team with a good coach that practices and plays games close to your house is more important than playing in a specific league.
You tend to get a lot of "ECNL is the best" comments on this site and I can say without a doubt that it's only true in Socal if your kid is playing on the top 3-4 teams.
Maybe I am a little biased to GA but my kid has played both ECNL and GA so I've seen both sides of the coin.
My experience has been that being on a top team with a good coach that practices and plays games close to your house is more important than playing in a specific league.
You tend to get a lot of "ECNL is the best" comments on this site and I can say without a doubt that it's only true in Socal if your kid is playing on the top 3-4 teams.