The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

espola said:
T's lawyers are so inept that they can't even pound the table effectively. One of them introduced himself as one of the prosecutors, it appears that they lied about being provided copies of the Capitol security camera videos, and they left this out of their "fight" montage --

Click to expand...
3-0 bro. Did you see the match?
 
www.mtvlaw.com

Philadelphia Trial Lawyers | van der Veen, Hartshorn & Levin

At van der Veen, Hartshorn & Levin, we provide insightful counsel in personal injury law, criminal defense law, business litigation, and more. Call now to begin.
www.mtvlaw.com

“Whether you’re walking down Chestnut or Market, Frankurt or Aramingo, be careful and watch your step. But if the walkway isn’t clear, and you fall and get hurt due to snow and ice, call 215-546-1000 for van der Veen, O’Neill, Hartshorn, and Levin—trial lawyers excelling in the area of the law most critical to your family. The ‘V’ is for ‘Victory."
 
espola said:
www.mtvlaw.com

Philadelphia Trial Lawyers | van der Veen, Hartshorn & Levin

At van der Veen, Hartshorn & Levin, we provide insightful counsel in personal injury law, criminal defense law, business litigation, and more. Call now to begin.
www.mtvlaw.com

“Whether you’re walking down Chestnut or Market, Frankurt or Aramingo, be careful and watch your step. But if the walkway isn’t clear, and you fall and get hurt due to snow and ice, call 215-546-1000 for van der Veen, O’Neill, Hartshorn, and Levin—trial lawyers excelling in the area of the law most critical to your family. The ‘V’ is for ‘Victory."
Click to expand...
The funny thing about attempting to make fun of the guy T hired is....they ran circles around the Ds who came from the Ivy League schools. So I guess you are actually making fun of the Ivy Leaguers. They couldn't even handle the guys T hired.
 
Desert Hound said:
The funny thing about attempting to make fun of the guy T hired is....they ran circles around the Ds who came from the Ivy League schools. So I guess you are actually making fun of the Ivy Leaguers. They couldn't even handle the guys T hired.
Click to expand...

Is praise for his legal skill some sort of wingnut tenet now? In an objective sense, the guy was given a case where he only needed 34 votes out of 100, started with 45 pledged to his side, and he only lost 2.
 
espola said:
Is praise for his legal skill some sort of wingnut tenet now? In an objective sense, the guy was given a case where he only needed 34 votes out of 100, started with 45 pledged to his side, and he only lost 2.
Click to expand...
Mr Espola Magoo is going off the cliff. Good bye sir. Eat some crow with some humble pie and then come back. I told you a few years ago about all this. Get with it sir and stop being a fool!!! Seriously, you got caught, sic!!!

1613407020110.png
 
espola said:
Is praise for his legal skill some sort of wingnut tenet now? In an objective sense, the guy was given a case where he only needed 34 votes out of 100, started with 45 pledged to his side, and he only lost 2.
Click to expand...
There was nothing in Ts speech that could be called incitement. The House was trying to impeach him on that.

There were enough sane Senators to see that. They were sane enough to realize that if that becomes the standard, ie you can go after someone for a political speech where no violence was called for, then many politicians in the future can be pulled up in front of a kangaroo court for the same things. As the defense pointed out with video, the Ds have been saying inflammatory things for quite some time. By the standard they were trying to set, their actions also would be illegal.

Use some common sense sometimes amigo. Stop being partisan and look at what was actually attempted.
 
Desert Hound said:
There was nothing in Ts speech that could be called incitement. The House was trying to impeach him on that.

There were enough sane Senators to see that. They were sane enough to realize that if that becomes the standard, ie you can go after someone for a political speech where no violence was called for, then many politicians in the future can be pulled up in front of a kangaroo court for the same things. As the defense pointed out with video, the Ds have been saying inflammatory things for quite some time. By the standard they were trying to set, their actions also would be illegal.

Use some common sense sometimes amigo. Stop being partisan and look at what was actually attempted.
Click to expand...

Partisan? Me? What party?
 
Desert Hound said:
There was nothing in Ts speech that could be called incitement. The House was trying to impeach him on that.

There were enough sane Senators to see that. They were sane enough to realize that if that becomes the standard, ie you can go after someone for a political speech where no violence was called for, then many politicians in the future can be pulled up in front of a kangaroo court for the same things. As the defense pointed out with video, the Ds have been saying inflammatory things for quite some time. By the standard they were trying to set, their actions also would be illegal.

Use some common sense sometimes amigo. Stop being partisan and look at what was actually attempted.
Click to expand...
I thought the GOP Senate line was that the case was unconstitutional and therefore they wouldn't vote to convict.

It was a political decision, just as the D's bringing the case was political. McConnell's speech the next day tells you what (most of) the GOP senate thinks of T and his actions.
 
Desert Hound said:
There was nothing in Ts speech that could be called incitement. The House was trying to impeach him on that.

There were enough sane Senators to see that. They were sane enough to realize that if that becomes the standard, ie you can go after someone for a political speech where no violence was called for, then many politicians in the future can be pulled up in front of a kangaroo court for the same things. As the defense pointed out with video, the Ds have been saying inflammatory things for quite some time. By the standard they were trying to set, their actions also would be illegal.

Use some common sense sometimes amigo. Stop being partisan and look at what was actually attempted.
Click to expand...
To add - it will be interesting as various people go to court and use T as their excuse, i.e. he told us to do it. Here's a Proud Boy literally doing that, and including McConnell's speech, while claiming Supreme Court precedence and including a list of quotes from T's speech as part of his defense.

Raley v. Ohio :: 360 U.S. 423 (1959) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

gov.uscourts.ksd.134926.7.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
 
whatithink said:
I thought the GOP Senate line was that the case was unconstitutional and therefore they wouldn't vote to convict.

It was a political decision, just as the D's bringing the case was political. McConnell's speech the next day tells you what (most of) the GOP senate thinks of T and his actions.
Click to expand...

With so many big donors pulling out from supporting anything t touched.McConnell is giving them a safe place to land.
 
I, for one, find it unkind to be accusing t of wearing his pants backward. It is more likely that he is wearing elastic-top pants with no fly, since the diaper within removes his last remaining reason for hauling his pecker out (Melania lost interest in the other reason years ago).

1622997332919.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top