The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

espola said:
I'm guessing from t's outbursts lately that he has been told the identity of the whistleblower and he has also been told that if he discloses it in public he will be breaking another law. I wonder how long he can hold out.
Click to expand...
Guessing and wondering is how Trump was elected.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
So far no whistler has been found to attach the report to.
Click to expand...
Have you even bothered to read the report, let alone the self-serving edited call summary? The report was an accurate road map that has led to a dozen or more first hand witnesses to Trump’s violations of federal law. The report is all but irrelevant now, as to its author’s credibility and background.
Yet feel free to dwell on it as the impeachment investigation concludes in the weeks ahead.
You’d be better served working on technicalities criminal defendants always raise when the facts and the law are against them, as is the case now for your boy Trump.
 
espola said:
I'm guessing from t's outbursts lately that he has been told the identity of the whistleblower and he has also been told that if he discloses it in public he will be breaking another law. I wonder how long he can hold out.
Click to expand...
The whistleblower will soon answer GOP committee member questions.
I wonder why T won’t let anybody testify?
GOP senate leadership already acknowledged that Trump is lying about “no quid pro quo” but they don’t care.
 
messy said:
The whistleblower will soon answer GOP committee member questions.
I wonder why T won’t let anybody testify?
GOP senate leadership already acknowledged that Trump is lying about “no quid pro quo” but they don’t care.
Click to expand...
t is counting on his ever loyal base (they don't care what he says or does), hopes that having his narrative repeated over and over by his surrogates sways those that don't pay attention and that sensory overload takes care of enough of those that try to stay informed so that he can survive . . . that strategy might work in a society that is as disconnected as we are.
 
Nonononono said:
Have you even bothered to read the report, let alone the self-serving edited call summary? The report was an accurate road map that has led to a dozen or more first hand witnesses to Trump’s violations of federal law. The report is all but irrelevant now, as to its author’s credibility and background.
Yet feel free to dwell on it as the impeachment investigation concludes in the weeks ahead.
You’d be better served working on technicalities criminal defendants always raise when the facts and the law are against them, as is the case now for your boy Trump.
Click to expand...
Okay. So whoʻs the whistler again? I just wonder why the identity is being hidden if it doesnʻt matter.
 
messy said:
The whistleblower will soon answer GOP committee member questions.
I wonder why T won’t let anybody testify?
GOP senate leadership already acknowledged that Trump is lying about “no quid pro quo” but they don’t care.
Click to expand...
Whereʻs the meddler.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
t is counting on his ever loyal base (they don't care what he says or does), hopes that having his narrative repeated over and over by his surrogates sways those that don't pay attention and that sensory overload takes care of enough of those that try to stay informed so that he can survive . . . that strategy might work in a society that is as disconnected as we are.
Click to expand...
Whereʻs that whistleer again?
 
It’s really funny that after lying and stonewalling for weeks, now all the Trumpies say “sure, he held up aid to Ukraine while he urged they investigate Biden. So?”
 
messy said:
It’s really funny that after lying and stonewalling for weeks, now all the Trumpies say “sure, he held up aid to Ukraine while he urged they investigate Biden. So?”
Click to expand...

"We do it all the time" - Mulvaney (who seems to have dropped out of sight since saying this)
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Itʻs pretty naive to think we donʻt “do it all the time”.
Click to expand...
Pretty naive, indeed. Lest we forget that time ... Actually you tell us Brother, what was that other time a US President held up foreign military defense aid as quid pro quo for dirt on a political rival? You tell that story so well. Go ahead. We all await your retelling.
 
Nonononono said:
Pretty naive, indeed. Lest we forget that time ... Actually you tell us Brother, what was that other time a US President held up foreign military defense aid as quid pro quo for dirt on a political rival? You tell that story so well. Go ahead. We all await your retelling.
Click to expand...
He doesn’t have that many words in him. He either says 10 words or less (he can’t carry a thought process or substantiate his claims) or he cuts and pastes from his online “education” sources.
 
Nonononono said:
Pretty naive, indeed. Lest we forget that time ... Actually you tell us Brother, what was that other time a US President held up foreign military defense aid as quid pro quo for dirt on a political rival? You tell that story so well. Go ahead. We all await your retelling.
Click to expand...

On a slightly different version of breaking the law "all the time", there was Iran/Contra, but the President was pretty well insulated from that, even though Colonel North didn't understand his role as the cutout man which led to legal problems for his boss, who acted honorably (in a sense) and protected HIS boss.
 
messy said:
He doesn’t have that many words in him. He either says 10 words or less (he can’t carry a thought process or substantiate his claims) or he cuts and pastes from his online “education” sources.
Click to expand...

I have learned a lot from those sources, such as what kind of garbage people will believe enough to repeat as if they made sense.
 
espola said:
I have learned a lot from those sources, such as what kind of garbage people will believe enough to repeat as if they made sense.
Click to expand...
I wonder why these rock solid conservative diplomats and military like Vindman, Taylor and Bolton has such major problems with Trump’s behavior? Curious, isn’t it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top