Bruddah IZ
DA
Why do you want it in a nutshell?
The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
Nonononono
PREMIER
Nonononono
PREMIER
Another nut allergist! Just eat it.
Several Republicans grew more receptive this week to the House impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump after acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney on Thursday said in a televised briefing that seeking help to investigate Democrats was part of the reason military aid to Ukraine was temporarily withheld.
This is what is upsetting about my Republican party, their silence! Don't make me vote Democrat again.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Would you have preferred HRC?
What bothers you the most about Trump, the jobs numbers? Stock market? Letting criminals out of jail?
Putting The USA first?
Sheriff Joe
DA
No shit.
Bruddah IZ
DA
You people need an epi-pen.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Yes.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Ron Vera says it's perfectly fitting that the American tax payer pay for massive renovations to t's failing Doral resort so the G7 can profit the t family . . . because trade wars are easy, tariffs work and the campaign to make the t family business actual solvent is now underway.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Trump’s Policies are Making Black Women Obese, ‘Kill Our People,’ Says Angry (Obese) Rutgers Gender Studies Professor
Posted at 8:16 am on October 20, 2019 by Elizabeth Vaughn
Photo Credit: https://twitter.com/BlackWomenOWN/status/1173695998989721601
Last month, Rutgers University gender studies professor Brittany Cooper appeared on an episode of the Oprah network’s show “Black Women OWN the Conversation.” She participated in a panel discussion about why so many black women are obese.
In case any of you missed it, she made the connection between President Trump’s policies and obesity rates among black women. Speaking to an audience of 100 black women, Cooper said, “I hate when people talk about black women being obese. I hate it, because it becomes a way to blame us for a set of conditions that we didn’t create. We are living in the Trump era. And look, those policies kill our people. You can’t get access to good health care, good insurance.”
She told the group that when black women follow the same diet as white women, “we lose less weight and we lose it slower.” According to Cooper, “public health practitioners think that our stress responses in the body change our metabolism.”
Drumroll, please. Wait for it.
“It’s literally that the racism you are experiencing and the struggle to make ends meet actually means the diet don’t work for you the same.”
The women in the audience all nod in agreement.
Leading the panel was a very fit young black woman. My heart rose for a moment when she said, “It’s also important for us to note that we have the power,” but fell when she completed her sentence with “to choose how we see ourselves.” What?
She continued “We will be fortified to fight all of these external issues when we pour into ourselves enough to say, ‘I love me. I’m not the conditions that surround me. I am not my experience. I am more than the circumstances I have gone through.”
To say that Trump’s policies are responsible for the obesity of black women is, obviously, ridiculous. I searched the internet for any year-over-year comparisons to see if obesity has increased over the last three years among this demographic, but was unable to find any up-to-date studies.
Studies do show that obesity is disproportionately higher for black women than any other group. Four out of five are considered to be obese. And obesity rates have increased in the U.S. overall in the past two decades.
But these women are preaching a victim mentality. It is self-defeating and it is dangerous. How about instead of telling these women “It’s also important for us to note that we have the power to choose how we see ourselves,” you tell them ‘it’s also important for us to note that we have the power to choose what we put into our mouths, to go out for a walk once a day or to go to the gym.’
Sheriff Joe
DA
Poor Adam Schiff, What a Difference a Report in the New York Times Can Make
Posted at 12:30 pm on October 19, 2019 by Elizabeth Vaughn
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
Poor little Adam Schiff. He thought he had all of his ducks in a row. Then the New York Times had to go and report that a member of his staff had been in contact with the whistleblower before he filed his complaint.
Prior to this revelation, Schiff had insisted that the whistleblower testify under oath before the House Intelligence Committee which he chairs. Ever since news broke that the whistleblower had prior communications with his committee, he’s been trying to avoid it.
Having observed Schiff in action, we can only conclude that he doesn’t want Republican members of Congress to be able to question the whistleblower about his contacts with Schiff’s staff or the media. Also, knowing Schiff, I wouldn’t be surprised if he himself met with the whistleblower before the complaint was submitted.
On September 24th, he tweeted that they’d been “informed by the whistleblower’s counsel that their client would like to speak to our committee and has requested guidance from the Acting DNI as to how to do so. We‘re in touch with counsel and look forward to the whistleblower’s testimony as soon as this week.”
11% Latinx in TEXAS?! You would have trouble getting less than 11% at a Klan rally... What a joke. Don the Con got over 25% of the Latinx vote in 2016 nationally...
Meanwhile, I'm sure Huli Huli Boi will come on here to rail about Don the Con moving the Syrian troops to Iraq instead of "bringing them home." I'm sure his very honest and heartfelt concern about military suicide will erupt in outrage now that the Syrian based military is just moving next door and an additional ~2000 troops are headed to another "endless war" in the Kingdom of Saudi.
Meanwhile, I'm sure Huli Huli Boi will come on here to rail about Don the Con moving the Syrian troops to Iraq instead of "bringing them home." I'm sure his very honest and heartfelt concern about military suicide will erupt in outrage now that the Syrian based military is just moving next door and an additional ~2000 troops are headed to another "endless war" in the Kingdom of Saudi.
Bruddah IZ
DA
We move nearly 10k troops in and out of the middle east every 6 months. I am glad I have raised your awareness of 22 service member suicides a day.
Sheriff Joe
DA
You are no Republican.REDSTATE nevermind
Sheriff Joe
DA
Durham to Interview James Clapper and John Brennan as he Expands Investigation; Brennan Wonders Why
Posted at 10:30 am on October 20, 2019 by Elizabeth Vaughn
CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 16, 2016, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on the Islamic State. Brennan said that the Islamic State remains “formidable” and “resilient,” is training and attempting to deploy operatives for further attacks on the West and will rely more on guerrilla-style tactics to compensate for its territorial losses in the Middle East. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
NBC News reported that Attorney General William Barr and Prosecutor John Durham have expanded their examination of the origins of the Trump/Russia investigation. Durham has increased the size of his staff and has pushed out his timeframe.
Durham will be interviewing former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper along with other current and former intelligence community officials. According to NBC:
Durham has also requested to talk to CIA analysts involved in the intelligence assessment of Russia’s activities, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, according to three former CIA officials familiar with the matter. And there is tension between the CIA and the Justice Department over what classified documents Durham can examine, two people familiar with the matter said.
With Barr’s approval, Durham has expanded his staff and the timeframe under scrutiny, according to a law enforcement official directly familiar with the matter. And he is now looking into conduct past Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, a Trump administration official said.
Although the probe did not begin as a criminal investigation, Justice Department officials won’t comment on whether it has morphed into one.
John Brennan told NBC that Durham’s investigation is “bizarre” and said, “I don’t know what the legal basis for this is.” He doesn’t? Let me refresh his memory.
Brennan’s obsessive fear that Donald Trump might win the presidency may have instigated the whole collusion narrative. He didn’t have to twist many arms to bring others on board, but his exhaustive search for “dirt” on Trump and his insistence that the FBI open a counterintelligence investigation was key.