The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Check out the new benefits available to illegal aliens in New York
Jazz ShawPosted at 12:31 pm on January 28, 2019


cuomo-point.jpg

Out in the Empire State, there’s more good news for illegal aliens. If you’re interested in going to college, not only will state leaders refuse to assist immigration enforcement efforts to deport you, but you can apply for state financial aid and grant programs to fund your tuition. This is part of the recent “justice agenda” announced by Governor Andrew Cuomo. The new legislation was named the “DREAM Act,” but it applies to far more people than would normally be included in the common usage of the word “dreamers.” (Newsweek)

Despite your misleading "(Newsweek)" ending, the only part of that that was from Newsweek was the factual, neutral article found by following the link.
 
Despite your misleading "(Newsweek)" ending, the only part of that that was from Newsweek was the factual, neutral article found by following the link.
It is and has been a given since lil' Joe came in that his links are pure BS, right-wing fever swamp fiction.
 
This blog is fun because we get to see the American remnants on here. They are so angry that they can’t keep up and, whereas in other geographic areas they have diners and such to congregate in, here in so cal they can only do it here.

You poor poor " Messy " Financial, your loneliness is getting the best of you.....
Try a Farmers site for hookups....one of them will loan out a Piglosi for the night.

 

Boycotting Starbucks is strangely reminiscent of the great Hannity Krupts Smash-up Publicity Stunt of 2017. Although I don't think Schultz still runs Starbucks, so how the boycott hurts him is a mystery to me?

Nor is Schultz running as a Dem. Which is the more interesting part of this story to me. I read in the NY Post today that he felt the Dem party had gone too left for him to have a chance. Food for thought... someone like Schultz might be a nice protest vote for moderates if the party swings too far left and also Republican voters who object to Trump's lurch to the far right. Heck, a viable middle of the road self-funded candidate could keep anyone from winning the election outright if they don't get the requisite number of Electoral College votes; and then it would be up to the House of Reps to vote for the President. Isn't that how it works?

If the Dem controlled House ends up picking the president- between Trump, Schultz and a "far left" Dem candidate... you know it won't be Trump that get's elected. Nor do I see Republican in the House sitting on the sideline when it come to deciding between Schultz and someone like Elizabeth Warren.
 
Last edited:
Boycotting Starbucks is strangely reminiscent of the great Hannity Krupts Smash-up Publicity Stunt of 2017. Although I don't think Schultz still runs Starbucks, so how the boycott hurts him is a mystery to me?

Nor is Schultz running as a Dem. Which is the more interesting part of this story to me. I read in the NY Post today that he felt the Dem party had gone too left for him to have a chance. Food for thought... someone like Schultz might be a nice protest vote for moderates if the party swings too far left and also Republican voters who object to Trump lurch to the far right. Heck, a viable middle of the road self-funded candidate could keep anyone from winning the election outright if they don't get the requisite number of Electoral College votes; and then it would be up to the House of Reps to vote for the President. Isn't that how it works?

If the Dem controlled House ends up picking the president- between Trump, Schultz and a "far left" Dem candidate... you know it won't be Trump that get's elected. Nor do I see Republican in the House sitting on the sideline when it come to deciding Schultz and an Elizabeth Warren.
Did you hear the protester yelling at him? If you run you will reelect trump.
 
Back
Top