The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Ricky Fandango said:
Probably because we dont have a "voter ID".
When the russians find out, they may take the money they funneled through the NRA into the Trump campaign, and re-route it into airline tickets.
They may be able to fly a hundred people over here to vote in the mid terms.

Think what they could do with a hunert bil in cash.
Click to expand...

Coocoo.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
The gift that keeps on giving.
Senate breaks record confirming judges for key court...
Click to expand...

So when it really comes down to it Joe... do you suppose the Republican leadership really wants to see Roe v Wade overturned? I know this is unPC to say, but you know they are thinking what a loss of revenue, not to mention their best wedge tool to drive religious voters to go out and vote- if RoevWade were over-turned.

My guess, the GOP leadership in the Senate lets this one die to after the midterm.
 
tenacious said:
So when it really comes down to it Joe... do you suppose the Republican leadership really wants to see Roe v Wade overturned? I know this is unPC to say, but you know they are thinking what a loss of revenue, not to mention their best wedge tool to drive religious voters to go out and vote- if RoevWade were over-turned.

My guess, the GOP leadership in the Senate lets this one die to after the midterm.
Click to expand...

If Roe v Wade were overturned, it would have no effect on most of the country. There would be a hodgepodge of state laws in effect, and women who wanted abortions in the more restrictive states would make a short trip. Unless they couldn't afford it, which would take us back to the ugly days of unwanted children being born into poverty.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Probably because we dont have a "voter ID".
When the russians find out, they may take the money they funneled through the NRA into the Trump campaign, and re-route it into airline tickets.
They may be able to fly a hundred people over here to vote in the mid terms.

Think what they could do with a hunert bil in cash.
Click to expand...
"Yes, and way more than three million illegals voted for Hillary, it's true, Trump said so and Hannity backed him up, so there." says a jerk with a MAGA hat, "The MSM and our intelligence agencies are all wrong and Trump is right!!!!!"
 
espola said:
If Roe v Wade were overturned, it would have no effect on most of the country. There would be a hodgepodge of state laws in effect, and women who wanted abortions in the more restrictive states would make a short trip. Unless they couldn't afford it, which would take us back to the ugly days of unwanted children being born into poverty.
Click to expand...

It would effect the Republican's ability to fund raise on the issue at the federal level. Not to mention there are massive numbers of American's who use the issue as litmus test for elections. Seems like a lot of them would be back in play. All for what you point out, isn't going to outlaw abortion at the state level.
 
tenacious said:
So when it really comes down to it Joe... do you suppose the Republican leadership really wants to see Roe v Wade overturned? I know this is unPC to say, but you know they are thinking what a loss of revenue, not to mention their best wedge tool to drive religious voters to go out and vote- if RoevWade were over-turned.

My guess, the GOP leadership in the Senate lets this one die to after the midterm.
Click to expand...
I doubt it also, even if they did it would be a state issue.
They are almost as bad as the fem Dems.
 
espola said:
If Roe v Wade were overturned, it would have no effect on most of the country. There would be a hodgepodge of state laws in effect, and women who wanted abortions in the more restrictive states would make a short trip. Unless they couldn't afford it, which would take us back to the ugly days of unwanted children being born into poverty.
Click to expand...
You were doing so well, then you drove the car right off the cliff Magoo.
The states that allow the abortion of children would continue to fund it, remember Planned Parenthood doesn't use federal funds for abortions.
 
Sad to say, I'm on my way (again) won't be back for many a day...

in the meantime, in case wifi fails me...

Goodnight Paulie MotiontosupressdeniedMotiontomovevenueDeniedMotiontothrowoutchargesDenied...
Goodnight Howdoyousolveaproblemlike Maria...
Goodnight Monty Negro...
Goodnight all my racist jacknuts...

While many of these trials are going to be very gratifying for me, I think Manaforte's might be #1. That is an evil scumbag of the highest order. He should have been locked up years ago...

Oh, and in case I can't get on-line when they indicte Killary (you know Obummer is in Namibia getting immunity!!! SWAPO!!! SWAPO!!) make sure to chant "Lock Her Up" for me. Extra loud!
 
Trump critic of the day -- John Weaver, campaign aide to John Huntsman, US Ambassador to Russia

If you don’t do the right thing and speak out against this man, then you’re complicit and you will have that stain for the rest of your life.​
 
Limbaugh: Remember When Obama Did This In Response To Russian Meddling?
by James BarrettJuly 18, 2018


Conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh was on a tear on Wednesday over the media's response to President Trump's widely criticized summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Limbaugh dedicated one segment of the three-hour show to providing some uncomfortable flashblacks for Trump's Democratic critics.

Limbaugh led into the discussion by quoting a June 2018 story by Yahoo's Michael Isikoff titled, "Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016":

The Obama White House's chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a 'back burner' after he was ordered to 'stand down' his efforts in the summer of 2016.

Here's the video of Obama's chief cyber official Michael Daniel revealing the "stand down" order in a Senate Intelligence Committee:

sddefault.jpg

"This is the Obama administration," said Limbaugh. "They knew the Russians were hacking. They knew Russians were engaging in cyber warfare, and the Obama White House chief cyber official testified that he was told to stand down. So Obama didn’t do anything about the Russians! Obama was telling everybody the Russians could not hack the presidential election. Obama was telling people that it was too massive and widespread and intricate, it couldn’t be done."

"The point is: Where was the media?" said Limbaugh. "Where was the media all hopped up about what Putin was doing in 2016, what the Russians were doing? Obama was telling everybody, 'Stand down. No big deal! Don’t worry about it.' What did Obama know that we didn’t know? Why did Obama want his own administration to stand down and not do anything? Could we maybe use the word 'treasonous,' that Obama was willing to stand down and stand aside and let the Russians continue meddling and tampering and whatever?"
 
Adam Schiff on CNN, talking about Natasha Redhead --

“During the course of time when they were actively in the investigation, the majority that is, we said let’s bring in Maria Butina, here are the reasons why we should hear from her, here are the reasons why we should hear from Paul Erickson who is alleged to have been involved in setting up this secret back channel. The Republicans were unwilling. They said no. We don’t want to have them come in, we don’t want to hear what they have to say. They wouldn’t explain why but it was very clear that anything that might tarnish the NRA, anything that might lead to discoverable evidence that might incriminate the White House or people around the president, they didn’t want to hear.”
 
espola said:
Adam Schiff on CNN, talking about Natasha Redhead --

“During the course of time when they were actively in the investigation, the majority that is, we said let’s bring in Maria Butina, here are the reasons why we should hear from her, here are the reasons why we should hear from Paul Erickson who is alleged to have been involved in setting up this secret back channel. The Republicans were unwilling. They said no. We don’t want to have them come in, we don’t want to hear what they have to say. They wouldn’t explain why but it was very clear that anything that might tarnish the NRA, anything that might lead to discoverable evidence that might incriminate the White House or people around the president, they didn’t want to hear.”
Click to expand...
Sucker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top